similar to: Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 41, Issue 14, Network FS w/o user setup

I am still trying to resolve an issue where I need the ad user's home directory to have a specific uid so that when I nfs its home somewhere the user can access his files. I found wbuser.pl out there at http://www.occam.com/tools/: Mapping Active Directory Users to Existing UNIX UIDsUse this procedure on systems where AD user accounts should correspond to UNIX user accounts on other

> From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > Date: 28 Sep 2000 13:58:22 +0200 > > Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> writes: > > > I think Occam/Ockham himself wrote in Latin. By my failing memory, the > > quote is > > > > "Entia non runt multiplicanda praeter necessitam" > > > > give or take

Table articles has column: author,body,etc Table users has column: login_name,email,etc articles belongs_to user users has many articles foreign_key author references users(login_name) Therefore in Article.rb: belongs_to:article_user, :class_name=>"User", :foreign_key=>"author" and what''s going on? how the rails find the reference

This is really strange - hopefully someone out there may have seen behavior like this before. I have a user successfully created in the Users table of my application. When I try to update a single column using: @user = User.find(:first, :conditions => ["login_name = ?", @login_user.login_name]) @user.new_cookie_key @user.save I get the error:

Hi, being relativly new to RoR, I''m having a problem which I found described in this forum and somewhere else - but with no solution. I know, that it may be bad to mix table and form tags, but the first solution of an in place editing within a table looked nice: Version using form_for: <tr> <%form_for :time_record, :url => { :action => "add_time_record" } do

I have an action that needs to update two models/two tables in one shot, and it works great, but ignores one column. Here is the action code: (verify_id is irrelevant in this case) [CODE] def edit @page_title = "Edit User" @page_active_3 = "active" if request.post? @user = User.find(params[:id]) @profile = @user.profile verify_id(@user.id,

Hi, tmux author refuses to add -h, --help option, because OpenSSH does not have it [1]. I don't see why convenience features of tmux should depend on OpenSSH, but because I have no other choice (and got curious) I ask here - why OpenSSH doesn't provide -h or --help option? I use PuTTY as my client, which processes --help option, and for `ssh` binary I usually use Google + StackOverflow.

A few days ago I upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9, and since the upgrade, the winbindd_idmap.tdb has not ever been modified, even after several restarts of samba, and reboots of the system in question. It appears that the UID mapping is still correct on the samba server, but I am just concerned that new user additions etc are not being stored to the tdb files. winbind_cache.tdb is being updated with

Testing 3.6.0 on a member server of a 3.5.8 domain shows some strange problems. With the standard: idmap config * : backend = tdb no results are returned by getent, and wbinfo does not always work, also no winbind_idmap.tdb file is ever created. by changing to: idmap config * : backend = rid or idmap config * : backend = hash results are obtained but are the same regardless of

Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same files from the client? Clients will be Centos5, Win2K, WinXP. Server is Centos5. To put it another way, all users have accounts on the server. I don't want to have to set up ANY user

OpenSSH supports the -b bind_address argument for binding to a local IP address when connecting to a remote host. It's however currently not possible to specify a local port to bind to, something I've found useful at several occasions. Below is an unified diff that introduces the [-B bind_port] option to ssh(1) and a ssh_config(5) style option "BindPort bind_port". This allows

Right - I know you've had a discussion about the argv[0] stuff already, but I've written this simple script to simulate the (now missing) support for Debian, and was asked to send it to you... --- ssh-argv0 --- #! /bin/sh -e if [ "${0##*/}" == "ssh-argv0" ] then echo 'ssh-argv0: This script should not be run like this, see ssh-argv0(1) for details'

I have follow an example in "samba-3 by example book", where it explain how to relocate a samba server as ADS member domain, in a sentence it said to delete all /var/lib/samba/*tdb files, so "winbindd_cache.tdb" and "winbind_idmap.tdb" files but when I start the samba server again in ADS new domain something's wrong. Because it is not able to map the same UID and

Hi All and my sincere thanks to Jakob and Joseph for your responses. I got around the nightmare for this site but it is far from satisfactory and given both Thunderbird, Roundcube and the Android e-mail client work perfectly as expected, this following links comments enforce what I experienced over the weekend: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/79231 I have not struck this

Hi, With "wbinfo -c user", a entry is created in winbind_idmap.tdb. But if I retype the same command with same username a second entry (with a different uid) is created in tdb file. Is behavior normal ? See you, -- Rapha?l Berghmans <rberghmans@arafox.com>

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Achim Gottinger wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> You can try to use tdbtool to delete the offending key with uid 2020. >> https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/tdbtool.8.html >> I'd stop samba make an backup of winbind_idmap.tdb and give it a try. >> In my case deleting the mappings from idamp.tdb fixed the issue of changing >>

Hi, Today I'm trying to debug a problem on samba 3.5.4 where a domain member server is having trouble mapping UIDs to SIDs. I must admit I never really looked at this before as everything seemed to "just work". Today I discovered that idmap backend on the PDC and the member server were both defaulted to tdb. This means they have independent views of UID to SID mappings I guess.

Hello Did anybody get any result for search in "Red Hat Hardware Catalog" http://bugzilla.redhat.com/hwcert/list.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Hardware%20Certification&quicksearch=3com&order=bugs.internal_whiteboard,bugs.bug_status%2Cbugs.priority%2Cmap_assigned_to.login_name%2Cbugs.bug_id&offset= On question for "3Com" I get only answer "15 certifications

Can someone clear something up for me? [[[ # For apache to read user files, the ruleadd must give # it permissions by default. #### ${CMD} add subject uid 80 object not uid 80 mode rxws; ${CMD} add subject gid 80 object not gid 80 mode rxws; ]]] Doesn't the above mean that an apache user (eg, user-supplied CGI process, PHP script, etc) has the ability to read (and write!) anything in the

On 21:52:01 wrote Ryan Ashley: > Alright, I already gave every group a gIDNumber using the "advanced > features" option via the "Attribute Editor". Each group has a unique > ID. There are 16 built-in groups (domain admins, domain users, etc) > and five I have. My last group ended with 10021. The first group was > 10001. I then stopped S4 on my print-server,