similar to: rebuilding kernel modules issues

i'm attempting to rebuild centos51 kernel-xen. (fwiw, because pciback has NOT been compiled into the kernel, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2767) after, yum install kernel-devel kernel-xen-devel and usual, ln -s /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`-`uname -m` /usr/src/linux cd /usr/src/linux cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config make oldconfig make menuconfig ... next, make rpm

I am going into: /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-92.1.10.el5-x86_64 and doing a "make mrproper" attempting to rebuild the Modules.symvers file. As I added ALSA 1.0.17 to the current kernel. I am getting an error: make mrproper scripts/Makefile.clean:17: /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-92.1.10.el5-x86_64/drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/Makefile: No such file or directory make[3]: *** No rule to

A couple of months ago I reported some problems with a batch of Tyan K8SSA (S3870) based machines. We are continuing to have an odd problem with these boxes, and if anyone has seen something similar elsewhere, I'd appreciate hearing about it. These boxes are running Centos 4.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp. They are dual Opteron 265's (dual core) with 4x2GB DIMM's. The

Hello, I'm top-posting my own thread with some homework I've done, can somebody help? In short, the problem is that kernel 2.6.18-53 (as per 5.1 installation) works OK while any kernel update makes booting impossible in Enhanced SATA mode. For newer kernels, only Compatible mode works, but at a very heavy cost in performance. The motherboard is ASUS P5GC-MX and the disk is ATA WDC

Hi guys! i followed tutorial for building custom kernel for centos5 http://howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_centos with lastest kernel downloaded from kernel.org . in menuconfig i used /boot/config-(mycurrentcentoskernel) as a configuration. then i compiled with make rpm. Result was ok, but my kernel was about 400MB of size! :( Next problem was that alltought i we had ip_nat as a module selected

When I download a kernel from kernel.org I can compile it making config and make bzimage, but in some case I tried to make the kernel for a specific CPU in CentOS kernel source and I can not compile the CentOS kernel. Why CentOS kernel do not compile as kernel of kernel.org? I think that should worlk ease. -- Devel it, Precio http://www.pas-world.com

I have a plain vanilla Centos source (not 100% sure where we got it from), but I can't seem to get a build that installs correctly. I tried the method described at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel, but rpm doesn't like the output file, and even if I install it with -F, nothing seems to happen - no new kernel, now initrd, nothing. When I tried following the directions in the

Hi How can I configure ssh forwarding as putty in window Thank you --------------------------------- Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0275 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0275.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e16e0e18187d9d931228c6e11c2d89bf kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm 84a3d53a655a9abbaa1bbc9e2a74d007 kernel-debug-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0275 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0275.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e16e0e18187d9d931228c6e11c2d89bf kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm 84a3d53a655a9abbaa1bbc9e2a74d007 kernel-debug-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0275 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0275.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 78271de2d69838649627edabf22065a3 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm 867eea6bf5aad07eb555ebbdaf1ffbd4 kernel-debug-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I found I have the following kernels installed last night: kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus Evidently I have a wrong priority for centos plus? I have the priority in every item in

Hello, since upgrading to CentOS 5.2 my notebook hangs while booting with a "Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception" error. Here is a screenshot: http://www.istari.de/olaf/centos/r0013878.jpg # uname -a Linux beutelsend.istari.de 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 20 09:34:18 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # grep kernel /etc/grub.conf kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5

Have a look at these pages: http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one posted in the bug report (kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.bz321111.x86_64) and I don't quite see any significant difference in write performance for this command: dd if=/dev/zero

Hi, I've got a fileserver that runs Centos 5.2. It's been stable otherwise stable for maybe a year or more, and now it's crashed three times since Saturday. The first two times the computer was completely unresponsive, and there was nothing on the console, and nothing in the logs. I was beginning to suspect hardware, (esp. RAM, PSU, or maybe a failed fan) Last night it

I am curious what should be the benchmark for making the choice of switching from 32bit to 64bit Linux? I have a few assumptions below. Is my logic sound? (This is a follow up to the "Adding RAM" thread) Assumptions: 1. 4GB Memory. The main benefit of 64bit mode is the ability to address more than 4GB of RAM. I assume that you use 64bit mode if you want to *efficiently* have

Hi list, I just finished building a custom kernel from 2.6.18-53.1.21 source rpm - this time with ISA bus and ISAPNP support which I accidentally left out of my previous attempt. Unfortunately, this time I forgot to change my identifier in kernel-2.6.spec file. Thus I now have one *installed* kernel version *without* ISA support, and another one *with* ISA support but as rpm, not yet installed.

Hi, I am using xen-3.0.3-41.el5 on Centos 5 with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5xen kernel. I'd like to: 1) When Dom0 shutdown, DomU's do the same. 2) When Dom0 boots. DomU's do the same. Is that possible? Thanks in advance! -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin -

Hi all I have a CentOS 5.1 x64 server, running Xen version 3.1.0-53.1.21.el5 & Windows 2003 VM. After doing a software update in Windows (via Remote Desktop), I rebooted windows, but it never came back up. So, I logged into the server via SSH, and destoyed the VM, and recrated it. Yet it doesn''t boot up ( I can''t connect to it via RDP). So, how do I debug it to see