similar to: LDAP syncrepl incompatibility between CentOS 4.x and 5.x

Hi, I have a setup with two CentOS 5 machines running OpenLDAP 2.3.x, right now the primary uses slurpd to send the updates to the second server, and the second server is using "updatedn" to allow updates (from what I understand! I'm no OpenLDAP guru here.) Clients are using pam_ldap and nss_ldap to get the users and authenticate them in LDAP. Right now hosts query only the primary

Hi, I am using both syncrepl (for replication) and smbk5pwd (for password synchronisation between samba and ldap account) overlays. I have configured replication in the simplest way: a read-only producer that forwards updates to the provider thought updateref. If I change my password thought passwd command on a client with pam modules configured for gaining information from the provider

On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:55:16 +0100 basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > at the Moment we use and Samba 4 in NT4-style Domain with approx. 20 > Clients. > > With the Problem of Windows 10 to join to NT4-style >

Hello, at the Moment we use and Samba 4 in NT4-style Domain with approx. 20 Clients. With the Problem of Windows 10 to join to NT4-style (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Required_Settings_for_Samba_NT4_Domains#Windows_10:_There_Are_Currently_No_Logon_Servers_Available_to_Service_the_Logon_Request) we plan to migrate to Samba AD. At the Moment there is the following scheme: samba PDC

I've been noticing yum updates on several servers I manage over the last few weeks, which I know I didn't perform and could not explain until this morning. At first I suspect a break-in, but found no other evidence or reason an intruder would run the yum updates I was viewing. Yum updates are logged in /var/log/yum.log, which is what Logwatch scans. Seems that the format of the log

Ran into a strange issue with XEN on CentOS that I think is specific to CentOS, which is why I'm starting by posting to this list first, I'll post on the XEN list depending on responses. My sense is this issue has something to do with how CentOS handles network setup on first boot of the XEN kernel. - Installed a brand new CentOS 5.3 server with minimal packages. - Installed XEN,

I am using Centos 5.2 as both my XEN host and guests. Both the XEN host and each XEN guest are up-to-date with the latest CentOS 5.2 updates. I've noticed over time that sometimes using init 6 (or init 0) in the guest works flawlessly and other times the guest will reach "Restarting System"/"System Halted" and hang. When this hang occurs the only way to finish the

Just prior to the time change, I made sure that ntpd and my timezone files were properly setup. Since this time, I've noticed the following errors: audit(1173310084.404:5): avc: denied { read } for pid=8634 comm="ntpd" name="unexpected.tdb" dev=md1 ino=147662 scontext=root:system_r:ntpd_t tcontext=root:object_r:samba_var_t tclass=file I've not successfully (so

Hi, Now that we have a new Dovecot v2.3 release, I've created a new Xi builder that follows the git master branch to automatically produce Debian packages for the future Dovecot v2.4. The existing v2.3 repository now follows the master-2.3 branch, meaning that this will only follow developments/fixes ported to the v2.3 stable release series. This was already true for the v2.2 oldstable

I performed a test install of CentOS Beta 5 on a system with two ~60 GB drives. When installing CentOS 4 on this system, I normally work thru setting up Software RAID with identically sized partitions on each drive. For my test, the CentOS installer only presented a single drive. I took the default of letting it do what it wanted. After looking over the system I have verified that /boot is

Hi, From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls LDAP changes from central LDAP server to a secondary LDAP server. So in other words, you can have your second LDAP server pull the db based on either; type=refreshOnly which mean the pull interval will happen when ever you specify or; type=refreshAndPersist which mean after a pull, keep the pipe open for any changes made. Now in

Two items I forgot to mention in my initial post: (A) I am running the sync command on the new v2.3 server. (B) To get sync to work, I had to add the following to the old v2.2 server: auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master I think this relates to what I said in my initial post about AWS linux installing all of the sockets into a non-standard location. I say this because when I was

The git master branch starts tracking Dovecot v2.3 development from now on. There are soon going to be several API changes there that might break plugins. If you wish to keep tracking latest v2.2.x development instead, switch to master-2.2 branch. The nightly releases at http://dovecot.org/nightly/ will also track v2.3 tree.

The git master branch starts tracking Dovecot v2.3 development from now on. There are soon going to be several API changes there that might break plugins. If you wish to keep tracking latest v2.2.x development instead, switch to master-2.2 branch. The nightly releases at http://dovecot.org/nightly/ will also track v2.3 tree.

So, I'm still planning on getting v2.2.0 out Really Soon now. Unfortunately I've had to quickly develop some rather large features still at this stage. I was initially planning on leaving them for v2.3, but they were a requirement for one project and implementing them now to v2.2 was the least amount of trouble for me. (And yes, I'm aware I haven't replied to a lot of emails in

On Tuesday 08 of December 2015, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > On 07.12.2015 20:13, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.20.tar.gz > > http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.20.tar.gz.sig > > > > This could be (one of) the last v2.2.x release. We're starting v2.3 > > development soon. > > Great! > > What's on

I think I am encountering a download file size limit on centos 4 with httpd-2.0.52 The file in question is 5.2G in size, it does not show up in a browser directory listing, and I'm getting the error in the http error_log value too large for defined data type: access can someone confirm that there is a 4GB limit (or other) in the standard apache 2.0 on CentOS 4? Tony Schreiner

Dear all, A couple of months ago, it has been mentioned that multiple users experienced a problem regarding the synchronisation of Sieve scripts by means of "dsync" (whereas e-mails were replicated just fine between servers) [1][2] for Dovecot v2.3.x; the same problem apparently occurred with early versions from the v2.2 branch some three years ago but has been marked/confirmed as

On 03/11/2017 11:48, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, we're in a bit of a v2.3 merge frenzy. Much of the LMTP code will be > replaced in v2.3, but I'll give the? older code a look as well. > > This can take a while though. Thank you very much for getting back to me, I can appreciate it can get hectic, and I don't wish to appear ungrateful, I wholeheartedly

All, For a production environment, I'd like to setup CentOS XEN guests as lightweight as possible. I'd like the XEN guests to be able to send nightly email as all CentOS servers do, but there is no reason to run a mail server as the CentOS Dom0 already has an email server running that can act as an email smart host. The options that seem most appealing to me are either ssmtp or sendmail