similar to: [Off Topic, kind of] eMachine model T5254

http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=8835Y11-R Use Promo Code: 8835DEAL to bring it down to $219 (plus shipping) I picked up two: 8835Y11-R -- IBM eServer 325 Dual Opteron 2.0GHz 1GB 12 2 $219.99 $439.98 (a little less than $500 for two) Thanks, Steve Totaro

Hello Leslie, The errors coming from the gnu assembler are due to the file being assembled in Arm state, to get rid of the errors you'll either need to put a .thumb directive in the file, or pass -mthumb to the assembler via arm-linux-gnu-gcc -Wa,-mthumb (I think). I'm not able to explain what you are seeing in your print out as it doesn't quite match the map file. Looking at your

Hi Andrew, Thanks for the background and context. "In your issue, just to clarify, is the ELF output from LLD also "large", or is it just the output from the llvm-objcopy operating on that ELF that is "large"? Do you have a simple sample to demonstrate this issue?" The ELF size is actually smaller, compared to what was generated from LLVM 7.x. (~900Kb vs

I have recently built a new server using CentOS4. I've found one major oddity: time resolution is completely whacked. I'm not using an external time source nor am I relying on NTP for time resolution. For some reason, time on this server moves forward at a far more rapid rate. Right now, all my other systems show Sunday May 8, 3:19 pm. The CentOS server thinks its Monday May 9, 3:54

Hello Leslie, I don't know quite what to say as I don't know precisely what your question is? If I am not being precise enough please can you put some explicit questions in? From what I can see in the output, here are some comments. >From your arc mapfiles it looks like that in the output both linker's have given the .text output section the correct base address given the

Does any one have any recommendations on an off-the-shelve PC for an Asterisk Server? This is for a proof of concept, so it needs to be inexpensive. I have tried 2 different PC's and had problems with the sound cards. I am thinking of PC's I can buy from local dealers like Best Buy, Office Depot. SO a cheap HP, Compaq or eMachine would work fine for me. --Steve

I've been working on ELF object support for the MicroBlaze backend and found that ELFObjectWriter assumes the x86/x86-64 architecture. Attached is a patch that makes the 16-bit e_machine value in the ELF header configurable by the target backend. Right now the target backend simply passes the 16-bit value that it would like to use in the ELF header. I have considered a second approach where

First off, I'm sorry for sending so many messages to the list-serv. Hopefully this will be my last for a while! I was going to use my WRT54G router as a small Asterisk box, but I forgot that I had a spare eMachines computer (Intel Celeron 633 MHz, 20GB HD, 64mb RAM). Will this machine work OK for a very simple dedicated home Asterisk box? Also, what is easiest linux distribution to use and

I have been working on getting ELF object file writing working for the MBlaze backend. Currently, each supported backend calls ELFObjectWriter::createELFObjectWriter from within the backend's TargetAsmBackend::createObjectWriter method. The createELFObjectWriter method then creates a new backend specific ELFObjectWriter class (either X86ELFObjectWriter or ARMELFObjectWriter) by decoding a

I'm trying to boot Fedora Core 5 Test 3 from either CD or DVD, (which uses ISOLINUX), and I get the error messages: Unknown keyword in config file Could not find kernel image: linux boot: There are at least two other people in the world with the same problem. Unfortunately, all of the rest of the Fedora test community doesn't seem to have a problem with it, so its not a high profile

I'm not aware of a written guide either. In 2016 I did a talk on that subject at the LLVM Cauldron (http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-09/#schedule) although quite a bit has changed since then so I'm hesitant to recommend it apart from general principles. I can't speak for the COFF side as I've only worked on the ELF side of LLD; my suggestions on where to start: - Properties of the

Jw, Thank you so much for your reply. The commandline: rsync -avH --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh /www/kunder/web/ MYHOST:/www/kunder/web Solved all of my problems, and I'm now much closer to completing a servermove. I however have one last question. When enetring the above command, I'm asked to type the SSH password to start the transferr. Is there any way to include this in the above mentioned

On 07/29/2016 02:52 AM, Peter wrote: > On 29/07/16 18:10, John R Pierce wrote: >> also, try and scrounge another DDR2 SODIMM for that thing, according to >> my google search, it supports up to 2 x 4GB == 8GB, and you said you >> only have the stock 2GB. > > They are dirt cheap on ebay, from Hong Kong with free shipping. I would > go all the way and max it out. >

On 7/28/2016 11:04 PM, Peter wrote: > On 29/07/16 17:13, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: >>> >>the Semperon SI-42 is, I believe, a 64 bit capable CPU, >> > >> >you are very correct. > In that case stop wasting your time with CentOS 7 i386 and install the > native x86_64 version of CentOS 7. This will give you access to all the > 3rd party repos you'll

Installing DevkitLite hardware (Very similar to John Lange's post on Tue Oct 08 2002) I cannot get anything to work on the phone connected to the s100u. I dont know what to do. Can someone please help me? I used the sample configuration files from digium documentaion that was supposed to be "sane" defaults for the kit. Very similar to John Lange's post on Tue Oct 08 2002 Here

So I just got ahold of an old e-Machine (Model EL1600) with 1GB of memory. I was going to install CEntOS on it and try to run VirtualBox for other OS'es. I am curious to know if I have to stick with the 2GB "max" the specs say the machine can take or if its possible to install a 4GB module that is designed the same? In other words I have seen 2GB DDR PC2700 memory that will fit

Hi LLVM devs,  I came across an LLD bug in v 10.x where ELF parser / processor is setting .PROGBITS attribute for .heap and .stack sections, which leads to large binaries when we do `llvm-objcopy -o binary` to generate the binary output for armv6m. (e.g. for a 57Kb elf would yield a ~400Mb binary). This in comparison with LLVM 7.x , would produce the correct binary size of 35Kb and the

Hi LLVM-Devs, I am considering switching to using 'llvm-lld' instead of Gnu 'ld' in a future revision of our out-of-tree target, and I am wondering is there a getting started guide for how to go about extending 'llvm-lld' to support an additional target. Thanks, MartinO -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development

>Hi folks, > >Our LLVM compiler creates a special debug section, which depends on a >certain >text section. This debug section is created with the SHF_LINK_ORDER >flag, and >sh_link field in the section header points to the correct section. > >When linking the program with the linker flag '-gc-sections', lld can >garbage- >collect unused sections. In my

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Patrick Meredith wrote: > How is this done? Everything logical I have tried has failed, here was > one attempt: Can you give a few more details about what you are doing? Are you running the verifier before writing out bytecode? Is your code operating as a pass? Can you send a dump of the generated LLVM code? > Constant *C = (Constant*)