similar to: EXT3 error message on CENTOS 3.4

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "EXT3 error message on CENTOS 3.4"

2006 Aug 14
3
failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)"
Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version
2006 Apr 17
1
EXT3-fs unexpected failure msg ?
Hi - We have had a raid failure, we have some what recovered but we continue to see the following ext3 message... Apr 17 14:59:14 acnlin84 kernel: EXT3-fs unexpected failure: (((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0); Apr 17 14:59:14 acnlin84 kernel: Possible IO failure. Since we have experienced several instances of ext3 file system corruption when we lose
2002 Jan 21
2
Assertion Failure
I got this.. The system was usuable, but not very. If I tried to access the ext3 volume, it would hang. Reboot hung too, complaining about too many open files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in
2002 May 13
5
Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:609:
Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the
2001 Aug 23
2
EXT3 Trouble on 2.4.4
All, I know that there is no official port to Kernel 2.4.4, thus I may not get any help, however I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction for my problem. I am currently forced to use kernel 2.4.4 for reasons out of my control (embedded board). Here are the exact versions of everything I'm running: ExT3 Version: ext3-2.4-0.9.6-248 Util Version: util-linux-2.11f.tar.bz2 e2fs
2002 May 31
2
PATCH for filesys corruption in ext3 with data=journal
Hi, as I mentioned in earlier mail to ext3-users I have been getting some corruption on an ext3 filesystem that has been serving NFS. I am now confident that I fully understand the problem and have a patch. It only affects data=journal mode and I wonder if it might also be the cause of the corruption noted by a number of people on linux-kernel. First I will explain the problem. Then display
2002 Apr 14
1
hardware or software bug?
I had the following spat out by syslog on my (2.4.18-pre7-ac3) mailer / web server: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" One of its partitions froze hard--I've rebooted it, and I have an oops which the BUG() triggered which won't decode at the moment, but I'll sort that one out
2002 Jul 12
3
ext3 corruption
Hello, Over the last month or so, I've noticed the following error showing up repeatedly in my system logs under kernel 2.4.18-ac3 and more recently under 2.4.19-rc1: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,3)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 I've now been able to capture the following Oops before the system went down entirely: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611:
2001 Jul 13
0
0.0.7a + rh2.2.19: help solve rejects
I get 2 rejects applying 2.2.19-ext3 to latest errata rh 2.2.19 kernel. 1) fs/buffer.c Should I put "J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0);" before or after " *(int *)0 = 0;"? ===== ext3 0.0.7a patch --- 934,946 ---- if (buf->b_count) { buf->b_count--; + if (!buf->b_count && + (buf->b_jlist != BJ_None && buf->b_jlist
2003 May 27
1
Assertion failure in transaction.c
Hello All, I am running Redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7-10 on a Dual CPU, 2 GB RAM machine. I am running Sendmail , Cyrus IMAP and Ldap on the machine After few hours I get the following error in the syslog error file Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:606: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: kernel
2002 Jul 09
1
kernel: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() ...
I noticed in the archives that there were patches for this problem, but I've yet to find the patches. Has this been fixed in any of the released kernel RPMs from Redhat? Right now this system is running Redhat 7.2. When I can get a maintenance window I'm going to upgrade to 7.3 and I'm hoping there is a standard kernel available that fixes these problems. kernel: Assertion failure in
2006 May 22
3
Errors accessing smbfs share after upgrade to redhat ES4.0
I used to mount following share using samba client on RHEL 3.0 without any problems. Then I installed ES4.0 and I started seeing problems with these samba shares. I have following line in fstab to mount the share : //bizgroup/wli1 /wli1 smbfs uid=501,gid=501,credentials=/etc/samba/.smbpassword 0 0 and /etc/samba/.smbpassword contains following username=xxxxxxx
2001 Feb 01
1
one question
Hi Stephen, I'm one of developers of SnapFS, which based on Ext3. I got Assertion failure from SnapFS, at ext3_new_block() in fs/ext3/balloc.c: J_ASSERT (!test_and_set_bit(BH_Alloced, &bh->b_state)) If J_ASSERT is only use as debug, why it will modify data? I found the 'BH_Alloced' flag only occures at two place: one is balloc.c as above, the other is at journal_forget() in
2004 Mar 18
0
mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not uptodate in JBDroutine journal_create() in kernel 2.6.
Hi Stephen, I found a bug in JBD routine journal_create() in kernel 2.6, when I debug the OCFS v2 driver. mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not uptodate. See following bug description. ------------------------------------------------------- OS: Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Plarform: IA32 Steps: 1. Build the ocfs v2 driver under kernel 2.6. 2. insert ocfs2.ko into kernel 2.6. 3. mkfs.ocfs2 -F
2007 Jun 05
1
Help on ext3 file system corruption issue
Hi All, I m a novice developer of Linux applications. Recently I faced a file system corruption. (I guess) I have a Kernel 2.4.7-10 with ext3 file system in compact flash. The system was up for 3 months and was running with average load conditions. One fine day, it just started sending kernel messages on the serial console. The message was like this. EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)):
2002 Jun 11
1
another oops, this time with 2.4.18-4
Back again with another oops, which looks suspiciously similiar to the one i posted some days ago (https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2002-May/003587.html). Jun 11 12:11:30 castor kernel: Assertion failure in journal_write_metadata_buffer() at journal.c:406: "buffer_jdirty(jh2bh(jh_in))" ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.18-4custom. Options used -V (default) -k
2008 Jul 01
17
Memory leak scripts
Hola, I am trying to isolate the memory leak I suspect in a mailman installation ? I found: http://blogs.sun.com/sanjeevb/date/200506 It gives an error: god at irt-smtp-02:~ 9:21am 65 # ./memleak.d 10312 dtrace: failed to compile script ./memleak.d: line 3: probe description pid10312:libc.so.1:malloc:entry does not match any probes I am on SunOS 5.10 Generic_127112-07 i86pc i386 i86pc Are
2003 Jan 18
2
[patch 2.4] Fix ext3 scheduling storm and lockup
This patch fixes an inefficiency and potential system lockup in the 2.4 kernel's ext3 filesystem. The problem has been present since 2.4.20-pre5. This patch is applicable to 2.4.20. A copy is at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.20/ext3-scheduling-storm.patch Anyone who is using tasks which have realtime scheduling policy on ext3 systems should apply this change.
2003 Oct 04
0
chattr +j ==> Oops
[sent this to ext2-devel but haven't seen any other traffic there, so cc-ing it here] [Last week] while configuring a new box I came across a site suggesting: chattr -R -S +j +A /var/spool/postifx to improve postfix's speed on ext3, in lieu of mounting a separate fs there w/ data=journal. So I tried it. Both on the new box (2.4.21-7um) and on my laptop (about three csets shy of the
2005 Sep 09
7
[PATCH 0/6] jbd cleanup
The following 6 patches cleanup the jbd code and kill about 200 lines. First of 4 patches can apply to 2.6.13-git8 and 2.6.13-mm2. The rest of them can apply to 2.6.13-mm2. fs/jbd/checkpoint.c | 179 +++++++++++-------------------------------- fs/jbd/commit.c | 101 ++++++++++-------------- fs/jbd/journal.c | 11 +- fs/jbd/revoke.c | 158