similar to: RE: Largish filesystems [was Re: XFS install issue]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range? (And yes, we do actually run a 70 TB at the moment, so I'm not asking just to annoy you; I'm genuinely

I am attempting to implement XFS on a new system. System: Supermicro SC846 TQ-R900B - rack-mountable SUPERMICRO X7DWN+ - motherboard 3ware 9650SE-24M8 - storage controller 10 Hitachi DeskStar 7K1000 - hard drive - 1 TB 8GB Ram 2 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420 / 2.5 GHz processor Installed Centos 5.1 X86 64 from DVD. System on /dev/sda1 ? 250GB ext3 (raid 5). /home will be on /dev/sdb1 ? over 7TB

Alain Terriault wrote: > Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage > under CentOS? > http://www.coraid.com > It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ? I have one of those installed on CentOS 4.6 with 1TB of storage. I'm sharing it between three servers. I can't say how well it works for multi-TB storage, but it works well enough for me

I have setup a new server centos 5.1 server as a storage server with over 7TB of storage. The server has been integrated into a large Active Directory network there are 5 primary AD servers and a large number of local AD server at each location (over 20). There are also over 15 trusted domains hundreds of groups and thousands of users. It has been quite a challenge to integrate the Linux

The inst/doc directory of the DAAG package has 6 files coral551.spot, ... that are around 0.85 MB each. It would be useful to be able to zip then, but that as matters stand interferes with the use of the Sweave file that uses them to demonstrate input of expression array data that is in the "spot" format. They do not automatically get unzipped when required. I have checked that

I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this? For example, I plan on doing rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs /targetfs is a NFS mounted filesystem. Any thoughts? TIA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We currently have a 3 node gluster setup each has a 100TB brick (total 300TB, usable 100TB due to replica factor 3) We would like to expand the existing volume by adding another 3 nodes, but each will only have a 50TB brick. I think this is possible, but will it affect gluster performance and if so, by how much. Assuming we run a rebalance with force option, will this distribute the existing data

Hi, Yes this is possible. Make sure you have cluster.weighted-rebalance enabled for the volume and run rebalance with the start force option. Which version of gluster are you running (we fixed a bug around this a while ago)? Regards, Nithya On 4 April 2018 at 11:36, Anh Vo <vtqanh at gmail.com> wrote: > We currently have a 3 node gluster setup each has a 100TB brick (total > 300TB,

We're looking at getting an HBR (that's a technical term, honkin' big RAID). What I'm considering is, rather than chopping it up into 14TB or 16TB filesystems, of using xfs for really big filesystems. The question that's come up is: what's the state of xfs on CentOS6? I've seen a number of older threads seeing problems with it - has that mostly been resolved? How does

? Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:16:54 +1100 Michael Milton <ttmigueltt at gmail.com> ?????: > Is this a bug in the `dyn.load` implementation for R? If not, why is > it behaving like this? What should I do about it? On Unix-like systems, dyn.load forwards its arguments to dlopen(). It should be possible to confirm with a debugger that R passes RTLD_NOW to dlopen() when calling dyn.load(now =

> Hi, > > Does anyone have glusterfs as vmware datastore working in production in a > real world case? How to serve the glusterfs cluster? As iscsi, NFS? > > Hi, I am using glusterfs 3.10.x for VMware ESXi 5.5 NFS DataStore. Our Environment is - 4 node supermicro server (each 50TB, NL SAS 4TB used, LSI 9260-8i) - Totally 100TB service volume - 10G Storage Network and Service

If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or home theater system. We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but I'm in the market for something new. The NetGear's aren't the cheapest ones around but they do what it says on the box. My only real gripe with them is the

On Linux, if I have a .so file that has a dependency on another .so, and I `dyn.load(now=FALSE)` the first one, R seems to try to resolve the symbols immediately, causing the load to fail. For example, I have `libtorch` installed on my HPC. Note that it links to various libs such as `libcudart.so` and `libmkl_intel_lp64.so.2` which aren't currently in my library path: ? ~ ldd

Hi there, we're facing some flapping traffic when rsyncing atm 70T from one server to an DELL Isilon. Both systems are connected with 10G Fiber (not Channel). So we started with one simple "rsync -a /src /dest" to the DELL by using NFS3. So it runs with around 3Gbit for some seconds, than it were 30Kbit for also some seconds and again "some" Gig were transferred and than

Morning All! Anyone ever tried exporting a StorNext CVFS filesystem from a Linux box??? I?ve got this Samba server (3.5.6) running on CentOS 5.4 and it?s working fine, exporting ext3, nfs and an IBM GPFS filesystem just fine. So I know Samba is good an my configuration is working. I tried to add the exportation of a StorNext CVFS volume and that doesn?t work. All the other volumes still work

I am migrating the main file servers at work onto a new storage platform based on GPFS. I am using RHEL 5.6 with the samba3x packages (aka 3.5.4) recompiled to get the vfs_gpfs and tsmsm modules, with a couple of extra patches to vfs_gpfs module to bring it 3.5.8 level. It is running with ctdb against Windows AD 2008 R2 domain controllers with all the idmapping been held in the AD. In order to

Nice to read this. Any particular reason to *not* run the OS image in glusterfs cluster? Thanks On 05/26/2018 02:56 PM, ??? wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone have glusterfs as vmware datastore working in > production in a real world case? How to serve the glusterfs > cluster? As iscsi, NFS? > > > Hi, > > I am using glusterfs 3.10.x for VMware ESXi

Hi, If the ext3 file system maximum size updated or it is still 4TB for 2.6.* kernel? The site at http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html says that it is 4TB yet, but I would like to know if it is possible to create and use stable & easy-to-fix (or at least as stable & easy-to-fix as ext3) file systems as big as 100TB for 32 bit Linux architecture? Any experience

Howdy, I am just starting to use rsync and now have an rsync server set up to back up our various machines. I recently started getting an error that is confusing and I can't find info documented on it. I searched the news group and found it mentioned but no solution yet. I get the error when sync'ing from a Solaris 8 machine to my Solaris 8 server. stat

Hi ! As some of you might know, Apple has discontinued it's xServes server as of january 31st 2011. We have a server rack with 12 xserves ranging from dual G5's to dual quand-core xeon lastest generation, 3 xserve-raid and one activeraid 16 TB disk enclosure. We also use xSan to access a shared file system among the servers. Services are run from this shared filesystem, spreaded