similar to: centos 5 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel and ipsec

Hello everybody. I would like to do some kind of shaping inside an ipsec tunnel implemented by Openswan and linux 2.6.18.x with xfrm (no KLIPS): for example, to limit outbound smtp traffic inside the tunnel. Question: where should I attach the qdisc to? Eth0? I''m asking this, because tcpdump only see the ESP packet on the eth0 and not the ''clear'' packet. TIA This is my

after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays on automount points. nothing in the rpm changelog looks obviously related to autofs and the autofs module seems to be the same as the previous kernel. i'm starting to do some strace'ing and other debugging, but nothing has jumped out at me yet. i'm hoping someone else has seen it so i know i'm not alone

This is an update to the iproute2 command set. It can be downloaded from: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.18-061214.tar.gz Repository: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git For more info on iproute2 see: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Iproute2 The version number includes the kernel version to denote what features are

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can

I am attempting to create an ipsec tunnel between two CentOS 5.1 systems, network-to-network with two different 192.168.xxx.0/24 LAN segments. I have gone through the documentation on the centos web site, and have the machines to the point where the /var/log/messages show ``IPsec-SA established'' on both machines after runnig ``ifup ipsec0'' (same ipsec0 on each machine). IP

Hello Xen folks, I have independently verified that this patch indeed fixes the issue (I posted a message about the issue over the summer: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg00114.html). I used changeset 8911 of xen-unstable.hg. The patch as written expects kernel linux-2.6.16-rc2, but changeset 8911 uses kernel 2.6.16-rc4. I verified that the patch works with

Hi, Just seeking some clarification on the current state of play with masqing ipsec connections. I have a client who establishs many different outbound ipsec connections. So thats - many local clients, through linux firewall, to many different ipsec ''servers''. they currently assign a public ip for outbound nat to each user to connect out to the ipsec connection, so we have a one

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Panula [mailto:greg.panula@dolaninformation.com] > Sent: 12 May 2003 11:10 > To: Matthew Braithwaite > Cc: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: iHEADS UP: ipsec packet filtering change > > You don't really need the gif tunnels for ipsec. Gif is more geared > towards ipv4 <=> ipv6 type tunnels. A few of ipsec

Hi, I have FreeBSD box with network interface having y.y.y.y ip address. On same box i configure next ipsec ploicys to process trafic from hardware ipsec enabled device. spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 x.x.x.x/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/y.y.y.y-z.z.z.z/require; spdadd x.x.x.x/24 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/z.z.z.z-y.y.y.y/require; Is it possible to see decrypted incoming packets, and outgoing

I have the task to make an IPsec tunnel between a Cisco router and a Linux router. The people that have set the Cisco router have sent me this (Cisco) config file, but that doesn''t help me a lot since I don''t understand nor ipsec nor Cisco syntax that well. So, can anyone help me to make the ipsec configuration? Second, what''s better to use ipsec-tools or isakmpd on

Hi, This issue might be a slightly offtopic, but someone might have experience with it. Thanks for reading this post anyway. I have the following setup: Network 10.227.7.X is connected over a wlan (172.1.1.1 <-> 172.1.1.2) to network 128.1.1.X. This setup works, I have cross-subnet browsing going and I am able to login. When I enable IPSEC (raccoon (linux <-> freebsd)) I am still

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:47:05 -0800, "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> said: > >> Add a new config option IPSEC_FILTERGIF to control whether or not >> packets coming out of a GIF tunnel are re-processed by ipfw, >> et. al. By default they are not reprocessed. With the option they >> are. > > This may affect your ipfw/ipf rules. If you are happy with

Hi, I am trying to setup ipsec tunnel between Freebsd (host1) and Linux (host2) systems.And I also interested in executing some ipsec test cases( Like TAHI conformance test suite) on the same connection. Please, suggest me some details regarding this setup and Specify any materials which can be obtained from from any locations(site).. I have enabled IPSec support for FreeBSD (4.11 Release) and

Hello, After I''ve switched from 2.1.6 to 2.1.11 I could not run Xserver (TCP 6000) over ipsec anymore, so I''ve reinstalled 2.1.6. Is it a bug or configuration issue? The error is: Shorewall:net2all:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 MAC=00:50:da:2d:c1:6c:00:0c:31:f6:c4:8d:08:00 SRC=192.168.123.150 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=62 ID=36507 CE PROTO=TCP SPT=35069 DPT=6000

While I have concentrated on support for 2.6 native IPSEC in release 2.2.0, I am still of the opinion that unless you absolutely need IPSEC compatibility that OpenVPN is a much easier (and in the case of roadwarriors, a much better) solution. Having already generated all of the required X.509 certificates, it took me less than 1/2 hr to replace my IPSEC testbed with an OpenVPN one using the new

Hi, Does anyone have experience using IPSEC on CentOS in order to connect to vendor IPSEC-based VPN products (specifically Checkpoint FW1) ? Is the included IPSEC implementation sufficient, or do people have to rely on OpenSWAN or FreeSWAN ? I'd be testing tomorrow and I'm interested with experiences others have had and things to look out for. Thanks in advance, -- dag wieers, dag

Buf ... Solved. Problem was that /etc/pam.d/racoon doesn't exists (I found this tip on NetBSD ipsec pages). Simply I have copied /etc/pam.d/passwd to /etc/pam.d/racoon and now all works as expected. Many thanks for your help Ross. Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I think it might just use another one like /etc/pam.d/remote > cause I audited the package and it wasn't there.

Hello, it looks like the usual way to do ipsec on centos5 won't work anymore on centos6 I installed ipsec-tools but an interface type IPsec is not recognized by the kernel ifup ipsec0 Device does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. I am not planning to use the awful OpenSwan, I Want to sue the Kame implementation which was working fine on CentOS5 any hints ? thank you

# ipsec verify ... If you encounter network related SElinux errors, especially when using KLIPS, try disabling SElinux ... Well, it is not running KLIPS but netkey, anyways I feel not comfortable about disabling selinux on a ipsec router. I am not sure how to handle possible probems in this case, too. If I decide not to disable selinux, and I run into problems, should I a) report it to redhat