similar to: SELinux, postfix and milters

Gordon, Thank you for your help on this. Still not working... On 04/26/2017 06:27 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, >> it seems > > > A bug report would probably be helpful. > > I'm looking back at the message you wrote describing errors in >

Hi: I have been using Dovecot for well over a year now and it has always worked with few problems. The mail setup is not simple... Postfix+MailScanner+ClamAV+Docvecot+MySql+postfix.admin... just to mention the major things. The system is CentOS 5.3 on VMware. The maildir is on an NFS share, index and control is local. About a month ago I thought I upgraded from 1.1.x to 1.2.x. by doing an

Hello, Does anyone have a sample SELinux policy for dkim-milter? I'm using the configuration from this page: http://www.howtoforge.com/set-up-dkim-for-multiple-domains-on-postfix-with-dkim-milter-2.8.x-centos-5.3 Along with the latest RPM from the link on that page. Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT

Hello CentOS Docs People! I recently used the Amavisd howto to setup a couple of mailservers, which saved me from hours of searching online and reading novels of documentation. Since Ned is taking a little break from the Amavisd page, I would like to help contribute. There were a few things I'd like to add, like GTUBE/EICAR testing and SELinux config lines. My wiki username is WilliamFong.

Am 09.02.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Leander Sch?fer: > I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm > currently using > > * Clam-SMTP and > * SpamAssassin > > to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with > SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd > directly. But I more and more wonder wether

Hi folks, I want to run Postfix with external milter application on a CentOS 5.3 mailgateway. At the moment SELinux is preventing postfix' cleanup daemon from accessing sockets. Before I to through the process of audit2allow trial and error - has anybody out there successfully gone though this and can send me a policy I can work with? Any hint or help is appreciated. Dirk

I recently setup my Puppetmaster server to run through Passenger via Apache instead of on the default webrick web server. SELinux made that not work and I've found some documentation on making rules to allow it however mine won't load. This is the policy I found via this website, http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/2012/01/20/selinux-passenger-and-puppet-oh-my/comment-page-1/ . module

POTS line already did. It's like a zombie channel. When this happens we issue "hangup request DAHDI/x-x". Anyone faced similar issue? Current configuration: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits, Asterisk 1.6.2.7, DAHDI 2.3.0. Thank you, Alex Saavedra --0016364d1dc91459020496ed0bbe Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div

Dear Mr. Baddeley   I just graduated from a Masters in Applied Mathematics on Jun19th. My thesis was about spatial distribution /a nalysis of some trees in a part of  the Congo Basic Forest. In my thesis I used your spatial package in R, and today I'm doing a more deeper study about how we choise the r distance in Function F(). I would like to be able to understand about value of rmaxdefault

Dear listers, I'm facing a puzzling situation with Digium TDM2400 card (12 FXO / 12 FXS). Once a day or so we detect 1 or 2 zombie FXO channels. These can be either outbound or inbound calls. I thought this could be related to obsolete DAHDI or Asterisk versions, so I upgraded to 2.4.0 and 1.6.2.15 respectively (OS: Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits). To no avail; the zombie channels keep showing up.

Dear R users,, I'm having difficulties when i use the gstat extensions in R especially with the graphical interface, as the variograms plots are depicted with gray background and cyan points for the number of pairs, Consequently the fitted variogram is drawn in cyan, How can i change that so i could have, white background and black lines for the fitted variogram, for the complete plot.

On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, > it seems A bug report would probably be helpful. I'm looking back at the message you wrote describing errors in ld-2.17.so. I think what's happening is that the policy on your system includes a silent rule that somehow breaks your system. You'll need

On 04/28/2017 12:06 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Here are the messages I got: > > type=AVC msg=audit(1493361695.041:49205): avc: denied { rlimitinh } > for pid=3047 comm="cleanup" > scontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_master_t:s0 > tcontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_cleanup_t:s0 tclass=process > permissive=1 My advice would be to slow down, and solve

Hello everyone, We are using an Asterisk server (Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits, Asterisk 1.6.2.7, TDM2400 - 12 FXS/12 FXO), but I noticed the following dmesg alert: asterisk[4687]: segfault at 60 ip ****** sp ****** error 4 in asterisk[400000+187000] The server is running without troubles. I know I should worry, just don't know where to start. Any advices? Alex Saavedra -------------- next part

Hello everyone, I have noticed thar our dahdi-channels.conf has some repeating directives, for instance for channel 2 (FXO) we have these settings: ;;; line="2 WCTDM/0/1 FXSKS" signalling=fxs_ks callerid=asreceived group=0 context=from-pstn channel => 2 callerid= group= context=default As you can see, a few directives are repeated (callerid, group, context). This was generated by

Hello Everyone We are upgrading to Samba4 from Samba 3.x, we got a fully functional domain over the last 4 years and we are trying to do our migration as smooth as possible. I have migrated, users, machines and everything to the new samba4 domain (not in production yet), however when i log and old machine from the samba 3.x domain to the samba 4 domains, the local policy still applies, i suppose

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/28/2017 12:06 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> Here are the messages I got: >> >> type=AVC msg=audit(1493361695.041:49205): avc: denied { rlimitinh } for >> pid=3047 comm="cleanup" scontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_master_t:s0 >> tcontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_cleanup_t:s0

Hola, estoy tratando de hacer un boxplot para compara diferentes comportamientos. Tengo un set de datos con 17 columnas, quiero crear un boxplot considerando 3 de ellas. He buscado en foros y siempre responden esta pregunta con subconjuntos de datos dentro de una misma columna, y no he logrado realizarlo. Este es un ejemplo de mis datos: ID: id animal EP: episodio AA: acostado y alerta AD:

On 21/09/19 9:07 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: >> Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have >> are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I >> looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just >> fine. > > Milters work a little different

I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2 (sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter). I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge (spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf). I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my previous mailserver on Centos4, and I can't remember if I did anything special, but on that machine it runs as user "sa-milt". Is