similar to: read only root file system

Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To: 'centos-devel at centos.org' > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil > sites with New DoDCAC > > I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved > DADEMS recently? DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would

Where did I go wrong? [root at mail busdev]# stat . File: `.' Size: 4096 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 32768 Directory Device: ah/10d Inode: 147591 Links: 5 Access: (0750/drwxr-x---) Uid: (56755/ busdev) Gid: (56755/ busdev) Access: 2008-01-06 15:49:53.000000000 -0500 Modify: 2008-01-06 15:49:15.000000000 -0500 Change: 2008-01-06 15:59:59.000000000 -0500 [root at

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >

In the bang head and repeat mode here. The live usb partition is /dev/sda1 Reboot / power on It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2 $ umount /mnt/disc/sda2 $ mkdir /root/foo $ mke2fs /dev/sda2 $ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo Kernel panic Snip from the kernel panic: ?????? list_del+0xb/0x71 cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186 ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37 .... system_call+0x7e/0x83 --

We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected hosts. Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This has always been a fine way to handle it as the zone files are for that specific host, and there have never been subdomains before. Now we want to just override the MX records for pdinc.us without having to merge or manage all the records for

let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it

Where should we start on preventing this type of problem? [root at server34 mqueue]# find | wc -l 185259 -jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555

> -----Original Message----- > From: Akemi Yagi > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:05 > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with > Centos and leap > > seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? > Should we be worried?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101 Bug ID: 11101 Summary: support writing to devices Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: jpyeron at

This completes the read only rootfs, all needed writable directories are in the tmpfs. Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- common-post.ks | 12 ++++++++++++ ovirt-node-image.ks | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-post.ks b/common-post.ks index 0c0a3f4..44a0270 100644 --- a/common-post.ks +++ b/common-post.ks @@ -146,3

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Murphy > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:58 > > I think the panic is the consequence of drive write failure. > So the actual > problem is before the panic call trace. Most of the time it panics without any warning, but once there was: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Sunday,

Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

So I was googling around about this over the last week and here is what I found: nis/yp is for some reason bad. Kerbos is holy, but no how-to's that don't involve windows and active directory. What is the recommended sso approach for centos? Where are there examples / docs to follow? Jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

I was in a hurry to forward email to our internal exchange server before my vaction, the best way I found after too much googling was to use http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/mail/smtpsend-1.02.tgz and :0 |smtpsend -to=user at pdinc.us -server=exchange Was there a way to do this without smtpsend? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

I am running a server inside of VMWare, and the clock gains ~30 seconds every 1000 seconds or 1.03X. I need to keep the drift under the magic 1000 limit that ntpd kills its self, but despite setting maxpoll really low I get: Dec 11 23:58:14 host ntpd[4909]: kernel time discipline status change 41 Dec 11 23:59:17 host ntpd[4909]: kernel time discipline status change 1 Dec 11 23:59:17 host

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.

Steps tried: Install from centos 5.5 x86_64 disc, locks up after reboot at GRUB (FAILS) Boot centos 5.5 x86_64 install drop to shell and chroot (WORKS) Boot fedora 13 isolinux disc, choose boot hard disk, launches centos 5.5 grub (WORKS) Compiled and installed grub package from fedora 13 on centos 5.5 x86_64 same problem. (FAILS) Boot fedora 13 isolinux disc, choose boot hard disk, launches

An hour of my life disapeared and my beautiful uptime was rebooted and it was fixed by reading http://serverfault.com/questions/98900/is-a-reboot-required-to-refresh-permissio ns-after-adding-a-user-to-a-new-group #/home is mounted from a NFS export [jpyeron at node000 ~]$ cat /tmp/jobs/foo.txt ~jobs/test.txt ~jobs/userstest.txt afasdasd cat: /home/jobs/test.txt: Permission denied Sun May 5