similar to: Good news for virtual EL-4.x boxes

Hi, I'm building a test asterisk server and building the latest kernel I got to wonder if there are any specific recommendations about schedulers and so forth for optimum performance. There are a few areas that raise questions in my mind and I wonder if anyone has any opinions/comments on which settings are most suitable for use with asterisk: SLAB Allocator (SLAB or SLUB?) Tickless

Greetings- I'm running some USB DAHDI hardware on a system with a tickless kernel. The audio quality is quite poor. Could the tickless kernel be to blame? If so, when recompiling a kernel that is *not* tickless, is there a recommended KERNEL_HZ value? IIRC, older kernels used to be 1000, but newer ones are 250. Thoughts? --Tim

Hi all, If you are using the kernel divider= option in your vmware quest, you are probably aware of the bugs reported at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315471 Someone @redhat "confirmed" the fix is in the test kernel -92. I tried it but it seems to have the same problem as before - when used with clocksource=pit, it hangs on bootup. Wonder if some of you can test this

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0307 mailman security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0307.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.7.i386.rpm src: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.7.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0307 mailman security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0307.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.7.x86_64.rpm src: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.7.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses.

Hello to everyone on the list, I have upgraded my RHEL4 to RHEL5.1 yesterday (all updates have been applied to it as well). I used to have dovecot v0.99.11 on the old system. Everything was working fine. Now I have 5.1 and its respective dovecot v1.0.rc15. Upon upgrading to RHEL5.1, dovecot no longer works correctly. The first thing I did after rewriting the config file for the updated version,

Hi,all, Is there anyone which installed xen on ibm system x3650? I read a link from redhat: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_46_10304.shtm That is running xen guests on System x3950 is not recommended. I installed rhel5.1 x86_64 on a ibm system x3650 with xen kernel,but I can not install guest with paravirtualizing,the guest os include rhel5.1 32/64bit rhel4.5/32bit the guest crashed when the

Hi All! I''m using RHEL5.1 in a guest domain and with kernel 2.6.18-53.el5xen. Is need the source of this kernel to compile an application, someone knows how do I get this source? Thanks in advance, Daniel Aparecido Martins Rosa _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I am running CentOS 5.3 32bit as a VirtualBox 3.0.0 guest running on Windows XP. The Windows host CPU usage is constantly at 50% although the CentOS guest is completely idle (i.e. 0.00 load average). I know this is a common problem related to the 1000Hz frequency that the CentOS kernel runs at. With previous versions of CentOS, I used the kernel-vm package [1] and it solved my problem.

Hello, I am trying to build a custom kernel 2.6.24 from ubuntu with xen dom0 support. Does Xen support a tickless system (CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y) and the realtime features of this kernel (CONFIG_PREEMPT=Y instead of CONFIG_PREEMP_VOLUNTARY)? Everytime, I set these options while configuring the kernel, the two settings are not regarded during kernel compilation. I also tried to build the

Hello, We have installed RHEL 5.2 Server ( i386 image ) on a machine with 64GB of RAM. When booting the default PAE kernel ( 2.6.18-92.el5PAE ) that is shipped with RHEL 5.2 installation the OS detects 64GB of RAM. But when booting the Xen kernel ( 2.6.18-92.el5xen ) the OS detects only 14GB of the total amount of available RAM. Did anyone encounter this problem before ? Is it a normal

Hi, xen-3.0.3-41.el5 on RHEL5.1 I''m trying to use tap:aio thusly: disk = [ ''file:/var/lib/xen/images/webmail.golden.net.img,hda,w'' _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, Not sure if this is the right forum: I''m encountering difficulties with o2ib which prevents an LNET shutdown from proceeding: Unloading OpenIB kernel modules:NET: Unregistered protocal family 27 Failed to unload rdma_cm Failed to unload rdma_cm Failed to unload ib_cm Failed to unload ib_sa LustreError: 131-3: Received notification of device removal Please shutdown LNET

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Under 4.6, we recompiled the kernel with HZ=100 for improved time-keeping in VMware guests. I've read about the backporting of the divider patch into RHEL/CentOS 4.7, but it sounds like it also comes with some bugs. I have been unable to determine the current status of the divider option in the latest 4.7 kernel update. I have experimented with "divider=10" and it works with no major

I'm running VMware Server 1.0.6 on a CentOS 5.2 host and am having some clock difficulties. Host OS is x86_64 running on 1.9 GHz AMD Sempron, nVidia chipset. Guest OS's are 32-bit FreeBSD (clock works fine after disabling ACPI, setting the clock source to the PIT, and running the guest tools), WinXP (unknown clock status), and i686 CentOS 5.2 (here is the problem). I've tried pretty

hi all i am trying to boot from rhel5.1 x86_64 image. with the following configuration kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" builder=''hvm'' memory = 3048 name = "rhel51" vcpus=1 cpus = "" vif = [ ''type=ioemu, bridge=xenbr0'' ] disk = [ ''phy:/dev/cciss/c0d0p7,ioemu:hda,w'',

Hello everyone, I''ve always wondered - would dom0 be better off with a tickless kernel or not? In other words, can someone explain which choice to make with regards to CONFIG_NO_HZ? -- Stay in touch, Mark van Dijk. ,-------------------------------- ----------------------------'' Mon Aug 06 15:40 UTC 2012 Today is Pungenday, the 72nd day of Confusion in the

Hello, We use Asterisk extensively for conferencing - for the last 8 years or so this has been the 1.4/1.6/1.8 releases running chan_sip and meetme for up to around 350 concurrent users. Right around that number DAHDI hit's a hard coded memory limit and kicks allocation errors in the log. [Jun 22 10:04:13] WARNING[9095] app_meetme.c: Unable to open DAHDI pseudo channel: Cannot allocate