Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "install perl with setuid emulation"
2007 Nov 16
1
Problem running a setuid Perl script on CentOS 4.5
I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the
security implications), but am getting this error:
% cat testsetuid.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -UT
print "My real user id is $< but my effective user id is $>\n";
exit(0);
% ./testsetuid.pl
Can't do setuid (cannot exec sperl)
I am using the stock Perl that came with CentOS 4.5. The problem I
2000 Jul 27
1
rh62 suid files
Hi,
I believe having less root setuid binaries on system is The Way ...
so:
Why does RH6.2 ships with /sbin/dump & /sbin/restore root setuid? These
are for sysadmins, not for regular users I hope.
Is /sbin/unix_chkpwd really used and what is it used for? I haven't find
anything about it in pam documentation.
Is it really necessary to ship /usr/bin/gpasswd and /usr/bin/newgrp? Does
2007 Aug 31
4
Virtual Hosting
Dear All,
Im sorry for posting this query here but was helpless.. as i am not able
to subscribe to sendmail mailing list
i have jus installed CentOS 5 and the following software
sendmail 8.13
bind 9.3
this machine is used as a primary DNS and out mail server
and is been workin perfect
we jus have a new domain and i want to have virtual mail hosting on the
smae machine for our new domain
2007 Jul 15
2
upgrade my open ssl
Dear All,
I have centos 4.5 final and when i installed it there is a openssl version
openssl-0.9.7a-43.16 ..
i need to upgrade it to openssl 0.9.8 ..
also when i try to uninstall it it gives me a failed dependency errror
actually i did a nodeps and uninstalled openssl ver 0.9.8 but when my
sendmail was restatered compalined saying libssl.so.4 missing or error
actually i found that thaere was
2007 Jul 12
2
query on sendmail issues
Dear All,
i have installed Centos 4.5 and is working perfectly fine me actually a
novice and is my first time with centos though have experince with redhat
i do have a few queries..
1) i dont see /usr/src/redhat/BUILD and the other 4 directories..
namely RPMS, SOURCES, SPECS, SRPMS
so basically how do i install /src.rpm files
i have installed sendmail ver 13 with mailscanner n spammassassin n
2009 Oct 27
1
SetUID check problem
Running dovecot 1.2.4 on FreeBSD using Postfix. Everything works fine
normally, but deliver is executable by world.
This is not normally a problem, as I don't run deliver SetUID root.
But for whatever reason, when deliver is called by something that IS
SetUID root I get the following error:
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver must not be both world-executable
and setuid-root. This
2016 Feb 04
1
libvirt.so is not safe to use from setuid programs
Hi,
When trying to connect the HyperVisor from a binary having setuid bit set , then I got following error:
Unable to perform virConnectOpenReadOnly function error(internal error: libvirt.so is not safe to use from setuid programs)
My test software config is the following :
-rwsr-xr-x. 1 root root 3374956 Feb 4 13:45 test
As this test software needs S bit to be able to access O.S.
2018 Jul 06
2
Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort=yes or setuid ssh(1) ?
Hi.
Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort or have ssh(1) setuid, and if so for
what use case?
ssh(1) has had code in it to support installing setuid root since
approximately forever, however OpenBSD has not shipped it in that
configuration since 2002 (and I suspect these days no vendor does).
As far as I can tell, all of the reasons for this no longer apply:
- setuid root was needed to bind to a
2010 Apr 07
3
how to mount shares as a user without mount.cifs setuid
I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have
recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set. Now it
appears that they have changed the internal settings to prevent it from
running setuid. This means that I can't define the share in fstab with
"user" and connect from my Linux user account. Mounting smb/cifs shares
seems to be blocked
2007 May 13
1
dovecot deliver tries to setuid but why?
Hi!
I've set up postfix(2.4.1) + dovecot(1.0-cvs) + dovecot-lda(1.0-cvs).
Dovecot's deliver is running as vmail:vmail (according to postfix's
master.cf).
Now the problem (when receiving mail):
deliver(leva): auth input: leva
deliver(leva): auth input: uid=8006
deliver(leva): auth input: gid=8000
deliver(leva): auth input: home=/var/mail/virtual/leva
deliver(leva): setuid(8006)
2006 Dec 03
1
Deliver Root Setuid
Hi,
I just configured my Postfix installation to deliver via Dovecot LDA. But
because I use separate uids for virtual domains I had to set deliver to be
setuid root. Altough I find this as frequent answer to this problem with
deliver LDA I am not a 100% sure - basically because I try to avoid root
setuids as much as I can.
What should be better solution - to have all mailboxes with one owner or
2007 Apr 24
2
chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit
Hi OpenSSH developers,
I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased
with the work you've done.
I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp
and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior:
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838
when using chmod sftp client command
it appears that setuid / setgid bits are
2011 Apr 21
7
[Bug 1893] New: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893
Summary: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.8p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2004 Feb 27
1
setuid rsync
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I trying to create an automated backup from one machine to the other via
SSH. I have setup ssh keys and so on, so everything is pretty much
working. The only thing is, I am trying to perserve file ownership. I
don't want to use ssh keys w/o a password (for obvious reasons), so I
what I did was this:
I setup a chrooted account called
2009 Mar 25
2
help on kerberos5
Dear All,
this i feel is a little out of topic but really apprecite if someone can help
i am tryin to authenicate my Centos 5.2 box to windows 2003 ADS server ..
but am not able to do so .
i get the following error when i run kinit
kinit(v5): Improper format of Kerberos configuration file while
initializing Kerberos 5 library
i have the following packages installed on my linux box
[root at
2002 Jun 11
4
ssh setuid changes.
Ok, I'm doing a heads up here.
I just applied:
- markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2002/06/11 04:14:26
[ssh.c sshconnect.c sshconnect.h]
no longer use uidswap.[ch] from the ssh client
run less code with euid==0 if ssh is installed setuid root
just switch the euid, don't switch the complete set of groups
(this is only needed by sshd). ok provos@
A few comments about
2019 May 24
2
imap userdb Fatal setuid errors
I?m trying to configure dovecot lmtp in multi-user mode. My error logs are filled with messages saying that an imap process cannot do a setuid to another user:
> May 21 22:28:46 imap(pid 17441 user myuser): Fatal: setuid(512(myuser) from userdb lookup) failed with euid=501(adminuser): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process user set to 512(myuser) instead of
2007 Aug 01
1
need help.. n do apolosize
Dear All,
cd any one plss let me know how to subscribe to sendmail mailing lists..
i am not able to do it
apprecite n thanks
regards
simon
--
Network Administrator
2007 Aug 03
1
where the problem
Dear All
I have jus migrated to centos 5 and jus wondering why n where this problem
could be
server A which is running for the past 2 years used as my primary dns and
mail server
redhat linux 8
sendmail ver-8.12.5-7
bind ver -9.2.1-9
since the server is old and is prone to all security problems i have a new
machine which i have installed the following and will replace my existing
2005 Jul 06
1
setuid/setgid bits
version: rsync v2.6.1 (+ a minor, unrelated patch).
I'm rsyncing files (not as root) and am happy (indeed, for what I
want, delighted) that the files at the target side end up owned by the
account doing the rsync.
However, I've found that if I have a setuid/setgid file on the source
side, the target file ends up setuid/setgid too (but under a different
id!). This happens whether