similar to: Markdown-Discuss Digest, Vol 98, Issue 21

from : benoit at transmekong.com to : markdown-discuss at six.pairlist.net Subj.: Use of Markdown Extra in a forum Date : Apr 19th 2007, 15:24:25 (GMT+7) Dear all, I have tried to implement PHP Markdown Extra in a forum (PunBB) and found that however well each message is translated, there are collisions when different messages in the same page have the same inside link names (footnotes, title

i am considering writing converters between my "zen markup language' and "markdown", but i don't know which version of markdown to target. i'd think it'd be the "pandoc" version, and i understand that to be closest to "multimarkdown", but gruber has said he "disagrees" with "almost every part" of multimarkdown's syntax

It was a very useful feature for e-mail parsing and I miss it. I use PHP Markdown extra to send multipart alternative e-mail, and the short syntax [link] instead of [link][] is very clean and lean. Do you plan to implement it anymore? Or is there a tweak to get the present PHP Markdown Extra to parse [links] as [links][]? BTW I did not find mention of this in

John, you've hit the nail on the head here. I finally know I can manually change my files to the .txt extension (thanks to helpful suggestions here), but it would be excellent if MMD Composer: a) had an option in the drop-down to save with the .txt extension, and b) had a preference the user could set to choose the default file extension for all files. It would increase ease of

While I empathize with your predicament, I generally prefer not to have expletives in my inbox. Also, what has this to do with markdown? On Jul 5, 2013 7:20 PM, "bowerbird" <bowerbird at aol.com> wrote: > fan_fucking_tastic. > > somebody hit another one of the dead skunks on this road. > > -bowerbird > > _______________________________________________ >

2009/10/20 Lou Quillio <public at quillio.com> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, AJG Baeumel > <ajgb at st-maurices.n-lanark.sch.uk> wrote: > > Why is Marksmarty no longersupported in Drupal 6.14? > > It's been a while since I've worked with Drupal, but I remember that > MarkSmarty was really just a hybrid convenience filter. It's better to > apply

Imagine my surprise when checking the news on my Windows Phone this morning and encountered this article <http://lifehacker.com/markdown-here-adds-markdown-support-to-email-and-web-fo-785865889>. Markdown makes the big time? It's about time, eh? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Markdown Here is a Chrome, Firefox, and Thunderbird (and, to a lesser extent, Postbox) extension that allows you to write email* in Markdown**, and then render it before sending. The project page has links to the browser extensions, screenshots, etc.: https://github.com/adam-p/markdown-here I started it last year after I finally got sick of how fiddly it is to write good looking, complex, often

Hi there! (1.) It may sound awkward, but I would like to use comments in Markdown texts. According to the rule that proper HTML works as HTML, I should be able to use <!-- blablabla --> But the converters I use do strange things with comments. Is there an official rule about that? (2.) I wonder if there is a recommended standard file extension for Markdown source files. For my

i should probably just let this listserve die, but... *** anyway, it's that brett terpstra fellow again... > http://brettterpstra.com/my-ultimate-markdown-editor-wishlist/ -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20120508/8915e1cf/attachment.htm>

anybody know of a converter between markdown and textile? i tried aaron's html-2-text on the .html i got out of textile, but it dropped some stuff, like the id's for internal links... the footnote references and links also got messed up... just wondering... -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

It appears that "double angles" are not properly converted when they are not in code blocks, if there is not a space following the second `<`. For example: This is not handled <<properly>>. But this <<is>>. As is << this>>/. becomes: <p>This is not handled &lt;<properly>>.</p> <pre><code>But

ok, how do we get markdown put into the browsers?, so people can start serving documents in plain-text, spared from the drudgery of converting to .html first. -bowerbird ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

I was interested in going back to research past discussions on the list about possibilities for a syntax to add a class="foo" to div's and/or span's to Markdown text, but didn't have much luck. IIRC, the list never had a searchable web interface, but older posts were available on a Google search. This seems not to be the case any more. Can anyone recommend a good

Hello, I'm trying to render the following page in markdown: http://lua-users.org/wiki/RiciLake This page was converted into markdown using Aaron Swartz's html2text [1]. And then rendered to HTML using Niklas Frykholm's markdown.lua [2]. Everything works quite nicely... except that under 'Lua Enhancements'... the very first header is not rendered as a header, but as

I'm building a website that has a common header across lots of pages and I want to source in that header. How do I do this with markdown? Matt -- I'm starting a blog. http://blog.tplus1.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20070810/9c4d5745/attachment.html>

Hello! On the markdown site it is written: "Markdown?s syntax is intended for one purpose: to be used as a format for writing for the web.", although recently I moved from Emacs Muse to Markdown markup for writing my study notes and plan to use it for writing technical documentation as well. However, in order to be able to use the features I had in Muse, I write using

Why is Marksmarty no longersupported in Drupal 6.14? AJG B?umel mailto:ajgB at st-maurices.n-lanark.sch.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify

Hi folks, I've just registered markdown.io. I'm not sure exactly what I'll do with it, but I'd like to create a resource for developers seeking to add Markdown support to their applications. I expect it'll be a single-page site with plenty of links to documentation for the many implementations that exist. Let me know if you have any ideas as to what you'd like to see from

where are the worthwhile markdown dingi? (dinguses?) i'm interested in any dingus that can take a "reasonable" amount of text -- let's say anything up to a megabyte -- and return the results in real-time, without a long wait... ideally it'd handle something more than gruber-minimum, and an a.p.i. (that'd take a u.r.i. as input) would be dandy... bonus points for