similar to: Install Adhearsion on Debian

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Install Adhearsion on Debian"

2007 Dec 03
0
Adhearsion Install Fails.
Not strictly an Asterisk question. I've tried to install adhearsion on TWO relatively fresh CentOS 5.x systems, and I get this... [root at localhost rubygems-0.9.5]# gem install adhearsion Bulk updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org ERROR: While executing gem ... (Errno::ENOENT) No such file or directory - /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/adhearsion-0.7.7/bin/ahn The
2011 Nov 25
0
Install Adhearsion on Debian [SOLVED]
2011/11/25 Olivier <oza_4h07 at yahoo.fr> > > > 2011/11/25 John Knight <john at classiccitytelco.com> > >> Was your PATH variable modified to add /var/lib/gems/1.8/bin perhaps? >> > > No I didn't. > I would have thought that rubygems installation should car of this (adding > installed gems into users paths). > As I'm new to Ruby, I
2011 Nov 28
1
Queue-Tip/Adhearsion installation tip
Hi, I'm giving Queue-Tip a try, following installation instructions in http://queue-tip.rubyforge.org/install.html. My setup is : ruby 1.8.7 rubygems 1.3.7 rails 3.1.3 Adhearsion 1.2.3 I'm struck in step 7 in the above installation procedure : # rake --trace db:create (in /usr/local/src/queue-tip) rake aborted! no such file to load -- initializer
2010 Oct 28
0
Adhearsion 1.0 - Now Showing
Thanks to the hard work of many people in the Adhearsion community, I am pleased to be able to announce the immediate availability of Adhearsion version 1.0. Since Jay Phillips first began work on the project in 2006 Adhearsion has changed the way developers think about telephony applications. Now with several years of operating experience and multitudes of applications deployed to production,
2011 Feb 23
0
Adhearsion 1.0.1 Released
The Adhearsion team announces the release of Adhearsion version 1.0.1. Adhearsion is an open source Ruby-language framework for creating telephony applications. This update primarily addresses compatibility with newer versions of other software but also adds native support for Bundler to newly created Adhearsion applications. Here are some highlights from the changelog: Handling of new Asterisk
2015 Apr 27
1
Asterisk proxying a REFER
Hello, we are using Asterisk with Adhearsion as our application server, with another Asterisk box acting as the office PBX, where all office phones are registered. A REFER to transfer calls within the office results in the Adhearsion application call being dropped, because the leg between the PBX and the app server is terminated by the PBX following the REFER. Is there a way to configure
2010 Jan 20
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is there any way to eliminate zero-extension instruction?
On 20 Jan 2010, at 07:55, minwook Ahn wrote: > Dear developers. > > We try to make our own backend of llvm for our target machine. > > Assume that we have the following code in our source code. > > int i = ( a < b ); > > The code is translated into > > r0 <- gt r1 r2 > r3 <- and r0 0x1 > > We think that r3 is not necessary. Is there any way
2015 May 15
1
Re-INVITE and bridge breakage
Hello, as a variation of our issues with Adhearsion calls dropping when an INVITE comes in for a bridged call, I now have a new issue to contend with. Our call is in an AsyncAGI application, and has been bridged to another channel. The provider that supplies the DID sends a polling reINVITE every 15 minutes (it's a documented Metaswitch behavior amongst others). The reINVITE is seen as a new
2010 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is there any way to eliminate zero-extension instruction?
Dear developers. We try to make our own backend of llvm for our target machine. Assume that we have the following code in our source code. int i = ( a < b ); The code is translated into r0 <- gt r1 r2 r3 <- and r0 0x1 We think that r3 is not necessary. Is there any way to eliminate it by just modifying our backend? Thank you in advance. Minwook Ahn -------------- next part
2012 Sep 05
6
Async AGI
Hi, Is there a way to execute next priority in the dialplan if you have called agi:async? I want to play warning message if adhearsion is down. Currently I wasn't able to make it work. The dialplan execution ends after the first priority. [incomming] exten => _X.,1,AGI(agi:async) exten => _X.,2,Answer exten => _X.,3,Playback(some-message) exten => _X.,4,Hangup Regards, Pavel
2010 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is it possible to implement target specific optimizations which can be applied after instruction selection or later?
Yes. There are lots of examples of this. For example ARM target has a number of specific optimization passes. See ARMTargetMachine.cpp addPreEmitPass() etc. for examples of how they are added to codegen pass manager. Evan On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:34 PM, minwook Ahn wrote: > Dear developers. > > My question is the same as the title. > Is there any way to implement target specific
2010 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is it possible to implement target specific optimizations which can be applied after instruction selection or later?
Dear developers. My question is the same as the title. Is there any way to implement target specific optimizations after instruction selection or later? I cannot find any related document. Please let me know. Thanks in advance. Minwook Ahn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2010 Jan 12
1
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Does our own developed module and functions can go along with the future improved version of LLVM?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Minwook Ahn, > >> We want to build our compiler based on LLVM by adding our own modules >> and functions >> >> which are specific to the features of our processor hardware. > > do you mean that you have files containing bitcode which contain useful > routines for your
2010 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Does our own developed module and functions can go along with the future improved version of LLVM?
Hello. I am a compiler developer of our team. We try to build our own compiler for our own processor. We want to build our compiler based on LLVM by adding our own modules and functions which are specific to the features of our processor hardware. In case of our developed modules, is it guaranteed that the modules can work in the future version of LLVM? In order to do so, what guideline is
2006 Jul 07
1
Rpad Server Installation on Windows XP
Hello, I have a question about Rpad Server Installation on Windows XP. Here is a guide http://www.rpad.org/Rpad/ServerNotes.html and I have been reading this more than ten times to figure this out, but still having trouble executing a Rpad website properly. Problem: for example, if I go to http://loclhost/Rpad/example1.rpad, I can see the whole website with the page loading sign staying on
2011 Mar 10
1
Dialplan: funcionality testing
Hello, I've tried to use adhearsion, but i think it's used for stress testing, not for funcionality testing. Somebody knows somehow that i can test my dialplan? Best Regards, Luiz Gustavo Chiaretto -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2008 Oct 29
1
app_swift installation problems
Hi, I have tried installing app_swift on both mac os x and ubuntu now and am getting the same error. I must be missing something, as I have tried multiple versions and everytime do sudo make install i get: if ! [ -f /etc/asterisk/swift.conf ]; then \ install -m 644 swift.conf.sample /etc/asterisk/swift.conf ; \ fi if [ -f app_swift.so ]; then \ install -m 755 app_swift.so
2010 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Does our own developed module and functions can go along with the future improved version of LLVM?
Hi Minwook Ahn, > We want to build our compiler based on LLVM by adding our own modules > and functions > > which are specific to the features of our processor hardware. do you mean that you have files containing bitcode which contain useful routines for your processor, and that you use like a library? > In case of our developed modules, is it guaranteed that the modules can
2017 May 24
1
precision of do_arith() in arithmetic.c
To the R development team: First of all, thank you so much for maintaining wonderful R software. Perhaps, Dr. Ahn has just reported an error on the wilcox.test() function, and suggesting that an error may arise from abs() and rank(). I just had a quick check that the problem may come from the precision of the results of arithmetic functions. 87.7-89.1+1.4 # > 87.7-89.1+1.4 # [1]
2007 Jul 04
1
Asterisk TV will go live this Friday
In conjunction with Mark Spencer's visit to our Paris office, we'll be kicking off Asterisk TV (http://asterisktv.com) live during the weekls Asterisk Users Conference. I believe someone from Lumenvox will be back with us on the conference, now that I've had a chance to play with their speech recognition product. I think we're starting to get some great info from the user