similar to: ltm: Simplified approach to bootstrapping 2PL-Models?

Hello All, I was wondering how I can get the overall Pearson chi^2 test of model fit with its df and p value in the LTM package for the 2PL models. Thanks, -- Davood Tofighi Department of Psychology Arizona State University [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I wonder why factor scores produced by factanal are correlated, and I'd appreciate any hints from people that may help me to get a deeper understanding why that's the case. By the way: I'm a psychologist used to SPSS, so that question my sound a little silly to your ears. Here's my minimal example: *********************************************** v1 <-

Hi, i need to test the equality of proportions in a paired case, like here: after before + - + 10 14 - 5 53 So usually i use the mcnemar.test(stats). Due to mortality, I now got the problem that my sample sizes in both factors are not equal any more -- there are less cases in the "after" condition. I already learned that Ekbohm (1982) and Marascuilo adressed the problem

The function factor.scores is used with package ltm and others to estimate IRT type scores for various models. It inherits objects of class grm, gpcm and a few others. What I would like to do is to use the factor.scores function, but feed it my own item parameters (from a bifactor model where the 2PL parameters are adjusted for the bifactor structure). Does anybody have an idea of how this might

hello R: we have a two-parameter IRT simulation code. The goal is to generate a response matrix.But the "for" part doesn't run. we don't know what is wrong with it. Thanks so much~~~ I <- 10 J <- 5 response <- matrix(0, 10, 5) pij <- function(a,b,theta) { a <- rnorm(J, 0.8, 0.04) a b <- rnorm(J, 0, 1) b theta <- rnorm(I, 0,1) theta for( i in 1:I ) { for(

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package 'ltm' (i.e., ltm_0.9-0 soon available from CRAN) for Item Response Theory analyses. This package provides a flexible framework for analyzing dichotomous and polytomous data under various IRT models. Furthermore, supporting functions for descriptive statistics, goodness-of-fit, ability estimation and

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package 'ltm' (i.e., ltm_0.9-0 soon available from CRAN) for Item Response Theory analyses. This package provides a flexible framework for analyzing dichotomous and polytomous data under various IRT models. Furthermore, supporting functions for descriptive statistics, goodness-of-fit, ability estimation and

Hello, II used the logLik() function to get the log-likelihood estimate of an object. The function also prints the degrees of freedom. How can I extract the degrees of freedom and assign it to a variable. Below is the output: > logLik(fit2pl) 'log Lik.' -4842.912 (df=36) Thanks, Davood Tofighi [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Everybody, I have just been introduced to R and have used the ltm package for calibrating items under IRT. I have been able to get the item parameters using the fit function under different models. I am using the 2PL model. I have got the parameters for some 300 items from 15 different tests using the function fit. Now I need to automatically generate tests such that they have atleast a

I have the following item response theory (IRT) likelihood that I want to maximize w.r.t. to theta (student ability). L(\theta) = \prod(p(x)) Where p(x) is the 3-parameter logistic model when items are scored dichotomously (x_{ij} = 0 or 1) and p(x) is Muraki's generalized partial credit model when items are scored polytomously (x_{ij} = 0 \ldots J). Now, I wrote the following two functions

Dear useRs, does any of you have suggestions on how to conduct a proper DIF analysis starting from a model of class gpcm (from the wonderful package ltm by prof. Rizopoulos)? difR will handle only dichotomous items, and I have a mix of dicho- and polytomous ones (that's why I chose the partial credit model). I also found the package lordif, but I'm not really sure if that's what I

In the near future I will release MiscPsycho, a package that contains various functions useful for applied psychometricians. I would like to include some data sets for distribution in the package, but have not created any of these on my own, but have used data distributed in other packages such as the LSAT data in the ltm package. Is it appropriate for me to distribute a data set in the package I

Hello, my question is; for a specific item, how can I create a plot with both the empirical probability of correct response and the predicted probability as a function of the mean of the ability intervals (similar to a BILOG plot). Thank you -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/IRT-ltm-function-plot-for-probabilities-tp2714881p2714881.html Sent from the R help mailing

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the new version of package 'ltm' for Item Response Theory analysis. The function grm() (along with supporting methods, i.e., anova, margins, factor.scores, etc.) has been added for fitting the Graded Response Model for ordinal polytomous manifest variables. An extra feature of the plot method for classes 'grm', 'ltm' and

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the new version of package 'ltm' for Item Response Theory analysis. The function grm() (along with supporting methods, i.e., anova, margins, factor.scores, etc.) has been added for fitting the Graded Response Model for ordinal polytomous manifest variables. An extra feature of the plot method for classes 'grm', 'ltm' and

I am using package LTM to estimate a Rasch model: irtestimates <- rasch(binRasch) I want to get a single vector containing theta estimates for all the rows (individuals) in my data matrix (hopefully in the same order as my data matrix) such that the length of the theta vector = the number of rows (participants) in my data matrix. I am using: theta.est <-

Dear R users, I'd like to announce the new version of the package "ltm" (available from CRAN), for fitting Latent Trait Models (including the Rasch and two-parameter logistic models) under the Item Response Theory approach. Three main extra features have been added: (i) now both ltm() and rasch() permit general fixed-value constraints (e.g., useful for scaling purposes), (ii)

Dear R users, I'd like to announce the new version of the package "ltm" (available from CRAN), for fitting Latent Trait Models (including the Rasch and two-parameter logistic models) under the Item Response Theory approach. Three main extra features have been added: (i) now both ltm() and rasch() permit general fixed-value constraints (e.g., useful for scaling purposes), (ii)

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package 'ltm' for analyzing multivariate dichotomous and polytomous data under the Item Response Theory approach. New features: * function tpm() (along with supporting methods, i.e., anova, plot, margins, factor.scores, etc.) has been added for fitting Birnbaum's Three Parameter Model. * grm() can now

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package 'ltm' for analyzing multivariate dichotomous and polytomous data under the Item Response Theory approach. New features: * function tpm() (along with supporting methods, i.e., anova, plot, margins, factor.scores, etc.) has been added for fitting Birnbaum's Three Parameter Model. * grm() can now