similar to: [patch] debian/copyright

Hi, I believe the package is ready: http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/debian/pool/lenny/main/x/xen-qemu-dm-3.4/xen-qemu-dm-3.4_3.4.2-1.dsc I asked Ian Jackson to sponsor it (he works for Citrix and is a DD), but it's been 2 weeks, and he seems busy with work. I'd be glad if someone was sponsoring the upload of this package in Debian SID, soon enough so that people will be able to test it

Hi, I believe the package is ready: http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/debian/pool/lenny/main/x/xen-qemu-dm-3.4/xen-qemu-dm-3.4_3.4.2-1.dsc I asked Ian Jackson to sponsor it (he works for Citrix and is a DD), but it's been 2 weeks, and he seems busy with work. I'd be glad if someone was sponsoring the upload of this package in Debian SID, soon enough so that people will be able to test it

I tried using http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/debian/pool/lenny/main/x/xen-qemu-dm-3.4/xen-qemu-dm-3.4_3.4.2-1_amd64.deb But my hvm instance wouldn't start. I got this in the qemu-dm log domid: 22 qemu: the number of cpus is 2 Watching /local/domain/0/device-model/22/logdirty/next-active Watching /local/domain/0/device-model/22/command char device redirected to /dev/pts/0

Surely you hear plenty about what''s not working, so I thought I''d shoot a quick message on something that did work. I got Windows Server 2008 RC2 installed. I have yet to even activate it and prove all internal features/devices work, but installation alone satisfied me! I had to fight a couple issues and I''ll mention them here, i think they''d be pretty

[message cross posted to the pkg-xen and xen-devel list] Dear everyone, Bastian Blank - which is the person (among others, but mainly him) that is packaging Xen in Debian -, has decided last summer that he doesn't want to deal with the qemu-dm of Xen, thus removing Xen Qemu and support for HVM in Debian. Here is what he wrote:

[message cross posted to the pkg-xen and xen-devel list] Dear everyone, Bastian Blank - which is the person (among others, but mainly him) that is packaging Xen in Debian -, has decided last summer that he doesn't want to deal with the qemu-dm of Xen, thus removing Xen Qemu and support for HVM in Debian. Here is what he wrote:

Hi, When I first built my Debian package, I needed to depend on qemu-system | qemu, since there was no other ways to pull needed BIOS files. It seems the situation changed, and that I could depend on less stuff from the qemu package. Maybe only the package named "etherboot" and "vgabios". To do that, my plan is to simply package a folder named: /usr/share/xen/qemu with in

Hi, When I first built my Debian package, I needed to depend on qemu-system | qemu, since there was no other ways to pull needed BIOS files. It seems the situation changed, and that I could depend on less stuff from the qemu package. Maybe only the package named "etherboot" and "vgabios". To do that, my plan is to simply package a folder named: /usr/share/xen/qemu with in

Hi, We normally run Lenny dom0 with 384 MB of RAM in our production server. But as we did few trials with Squeeze, I had the very bad finding that a Squeeze dom0 requires at least 1024 MB of RAM. As soon as I do something like "xm mem-set Domain-0 800", my server crashes: OOM starts killing processes, starting with sshd, then mdadm and so on, then the server reboots by itself. This

Hi, We normally run Lenny dom0 with 384 MB of RAM in our production server. But as we did few trials with Squeeze, I had the very bad finding that a Squeeze dom0 requires at least 1024 MB of RAM. As soon as I do something like "xm mem-set Domain-0 800", my server crashes: OOM starts killing processes, starting with sshd, then mdadm and so on, then the server reboots by itself. This

Hi everyone at the security team, I'd like to upload an update of xen-qemu-dm-4.0 in Squeeze. Below is the Xen Security Advisory as I received it, attached is the patch that they provided. Both the debdiff and the updated packages are available in here: http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/xen-qemu-dm-4.0/ Please allow me to upload this fix. If you wish, I can prepare a DSA as well (but

On 10/26/2011 05:29 AM, Mike McClurg wrote: > Perhaps you could send us a private deb file to test? I'm worried that > this might not be the right version that we need. Can you point us at > the upstream code you used? I used what was in the Git at: http://github.com/jonludlam/blktap.git The clone was made about a month ago, and it would be hard for me to tell when exactly. Adding

Hi, I've been trying to fix several bugs in XCP, before the Debian 7 release. It's not bug free yet, but it's going into that direction. I would need some help to fix the remaining! 1/ The new 1.3.2-12 release The Debian release team has already accepted an unblock for this new version that I uploaded in Debian SID. Here's the debian/changelog: * Fixes bashism in

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock package xen-api. The PAM fix which we did for version 1.3.2-10 wasn't correct, and thanks to the help of Steve Langasek, we have it in a good shape now. The details of the conversation is available in the Ubuntu BTS here:

Hi, anyone here is using HyperVM? As you probabily know, the owner of LxLabs has killed hitself (i want to make my condolences to his family): http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Bangalore/Techie-hangs-himself-in-HSR-Layout-/articleshow/4633101.cms HyperVM has some big vulnerabilities and we don''t know if they will be fixed. We don''t know if the licensing server will be kept

Hi Mike and Dave, Could you please produce a patch so that we can fix #674161? I believe I should be able to get a freeze exception, but please do not wait too long until fixing. Also, please pull the debian-sid branch from Alioth, which has all the fixes I could find in the BTS. Cheers, Thomas

Hallo, Peter. Cheers, developers! I'd like to join this effort, in case i'll useful with my crazy stuff. First of all, please consider subscribing this ML to Gmane interface. It would be great! Especially, if you will provide full-text archives for importing. (All that web archives suck, you know. Small and big archives are most easily handled with news server/reader.) Secondly. Did you

On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: > On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>> dget -x >>> >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blktap/blktap_2.0.90-3.dsc >> >> Uploaded! Thanks for your contribution to Debian. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Thomas

Hallo xenusers, I search a simple variant to generate CPU,Load for MRTG. Actually I use following configuration. But I see CPU-usage of xen0 only, not a summary of all VM. - net-snmp does not support xen [1]. - dtc-xen [2] show CPU-usage from each VM, but not summary. This view is confusing. [3] For monitorings from more than 3 physical machines unpractically. - enomalism [4] is too large

On 08 ??? 2014, at 22:31, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote: > On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >> On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>>> dget -x >>>> >>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blktap/blktap_2.0.90-3.dsc >>>