similar to: Building xen-qemu-dm-4.0 (2nd attempt, please reply)

Hi, When I first built my Debian package, I needed to depend on qemu-system | qemu, since there was no other ways to pull needed BIOS files. It seems the situation changed, and that I could depend on less stuff from the qemu package. Maybe only the package named "etherboot" and "vgabios". To do that, my plan is to simply package a folder named: /usr/share/xen/qemu with in

Hi, When I first built my Debian package, I needed to depend on qemu-system | qemu, since there was no other ways to pull needed BIOS files. It seems the situation changed, and that I could depend on less stuff from the qemu package. Maybe only the package named "etherboot" and "vgabios". To do that, my plan is to simply package a folder named: /usr/share/xen/qemu with in

On 08 ??? 2014, at 22:31, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote: > On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >> On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>>> dget -x >>>> >>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blktap/blktap_2.0.90-3.dsc >>>

On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: > On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>> dget -x >>> >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blktap/blktap_2.0.90-3.dsc >> >> Uploaded! Thanks for your contribution to Debian. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Thomas

On 09/09/2014 05:15 AM, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On 08 ??? 2014, at 22:31, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote: > >> On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>> On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>>> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>>>> dget -x >>>>> >>>>>

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: squeeze Hi there! Upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze left my box with xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 installed, and I had to "apt-get install xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64" manually to have it installed after a dist-upgrade. This for sure, isn't the expected behavior. Also, after the dist-upgrade, I did: apt-get

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --

Package: xcp-networkd Version: 1.3.2-13 Severity: serious If apt-get was used to install xcp-networkd instead of dpkg -i, then the debconf value selected for network-type wasn't respected. In other words, the users does: apt-get install xcp-networkd then selects "bridge" in debconf, then it's "openvswitch" which appears in /etc/xcp/network.conf instead of bridge.

Dear release team, I would like update the Wheezy package of xen-api with numerous small fixes. These aren't RC bugs, but I believe they are all worth fixing. I believe that the most important one to fix is #682202. Here's the changelog: * Fixes bashism in install-debian-pv.sh (Closes: #690612). * Fixes bashism in interface-visualise (Closes: #690710). * The /etc/init.d/xcp-squeezed

Hi, This email is mainly addressed at Waldi (Bastian Blank). I'm resending it since the previous one is waiting for approval due to its size being bigger than 40k (I compressed the .diff this time, so it should be ok). I have worked on enhancing the current packaging of Xen 4.1.1 over the last weeks. The main goal was to package the OCaml libraries of Xen as separated binary packages, and

Your message dated Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:00:07 +0000 with message-id <E1UOSj1-0002As-63 at franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#693137: fixed in swift-plugin-s3 1.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #693137, regarding ITP: swift-plugin-s3 -- swift3 (S3 compatibility) middleware plugin for swift to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new >> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. >> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are >> different, and just using upstream 1.6

Hi, I just upgraded to the latest SID after reinstalling my test server. Then, after a while, during the boot process, Xen seems to hang, then my server reboots. It's difficult for me to see anything, since I'm using a KVM over IP, using a quite slow link (from China to UK, using a FreeNX box that connects through a Java KVM over IP to the server), and I don't think it'd be easy

Hi, I've been trying to fix several bugs in XCP, before the Debian 7 release. It's not bug free yet, but it's going into that direction. I would need some help to fix the remaining! 1/ The new 1.3.2-12 release The Debian release team has already accepted an unblock for this new version that I uploaded in Debian SID. Here's the debian/changelog: * Fixes bashism in

Hi, Can you please let me be a project member, and if possible, project admin too, since I'm working on the XAPI and Xen packaging with Ian Campbell (who is also a DD) and other people at Citrix? I guess it would make sense to also have Ian Campbell and Bastian Blank as project admins, since they are also active DDs for the Xen packaging. I haven't seen you active in this project. Are

Dear Debian kernel team, I have backported (well, in fact, manually applied) Dan Williams patch (who is the maintainer of IOAT upstream) for the Debian 3.2 kernel. Please apply this patch. Note that I have tested it, and that I can confirm (as others did) that the issue is fixed after applying. This patch will be (or has already been?) applied upstream. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

On 04/19/2014 03:15 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:05 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Hi waldi, >> >> Are you planning to update the Xen package too 4.4 soon? Upstream have >> released 4.4-rc6 and AIUI are planning to release the final version next >> week (I've been out of the office for a bit, so I don't know the precise >> state,

Hi, We normally run Lenny dom0 with 384 MB of RAM in our production server. But as we did few trials with Squeeze, I had the very bad finding that a Squeeze dom0 requires at least 1024 MB of RAM. As soon as I do something like "xm mem-set Domain-0 800", my server crashes: OOM starts killing processes, starting with sshd, then mdadm and so on, then the server reboots by itself. This

Hi, We normally run Lenny dom0 with 384 MB of RAM in our production server. But as we did few trials with Squeeze, I had the very bad finding that a Squeeze dom0 requires at least 1024 MB of RAM. As soon as I do something like "xm mem-set Domain-0 800", my server crashes: OOM starts killing processes, starting with sshd, then mdadm and so on, then the server reboots by itself. This

On 11/14/2011 07:43 AM, Jon Ludlam wrote: > On 12 Nov 2011, at 09:17, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 11/12/2011 12:16 AM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote: >>> Secondly, there are a few more things that need to be done to your >>> blktap >>> packaging prior to uploading: >>> >>> * The xen-org/blktap.git repository builds and works for amd64 >> >>