similar to: Bug#587090: The patch is not enough

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1~rc6-1 Severity: important Issue confirmed with xen-utils-4.0 (4.0.1~rc6-1) in Debian Squeeze AMD64. Trace of error while using xm-debian.cfg (attached): [2010-09-02 00:53:21 1407] ERROR (xmlrpclib2:178) Internal error handling xend.domain.create Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/xen-4.0/lib/python/xen/util/xmlrpclib2.py",

Hi, I have a problem that I can't solve it: the hvm-guest don't start (same image works under Xen 4.01 on another machines). Further I'm confust, because I had to use xm instad of xl. A PV-guest works fine. I start it with 'xm create jessie'. Some data you can see down. What further information do you need? vg. ------------------------------------------------- call with

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.2.1-2 Severity: important After run xm create -c win2008.hvm Using config file "./win2008.hvm". Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' /var/log/xen/xend.log: [2013-06-10 21:48:59 31935] ERROR (xmlrpclib2:181) Internal error handling xend.domain.create Traceback (most recent call last): File

Resent of mail sent on 28.04. xend: fix bug in option parsing If you enable legacy tcp xmlrpc in xend''s config but omit to enable ssl the following backtrace is generated when starting xend: [2010-04-28 16:09:04 15754] ERROR (SrvDaemon:349) Exception starting xend (''NoneType'' object has no attribute ''rfind'') Traceback (most recent call last): File

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1~rc6-1 Severity: important Tags: patch The patch is not necessary for HVM DomU guests. The Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' was fixed by installing xen-qemu-dm-4.0. [1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588888 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > close 587090 4.1.0~rc6-1 Bug #587090 [xen-utils-4.0] xen-utils-4.0: Exception starting xend ('NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind') There is no source info for the package 'xen-utils-4.0' at version '4.1.0~rc6-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 587090 588888 Bug #587090 {Done: Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk>} [xen-utils-4.0] xen-utils-4.0: Exception starting xend ('NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind') Unable to merge bugs because: package of #588888 is 'xen-utils-common' not 'xen-utils-4.0' Failed to forcibly merge

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: important xend does not start because of a bug in option parsing. Error described here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/172035 Patch: --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendOptions.py Mon Apr 26 12:13:23 2010 +0100 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendOptions.py Wed Apr 28 16:54:04 2010 +0200 @@ -207,18 +207,18 @@ def

Hi Damien, Thank you. I read the rationale. Just to summarize, a user writeable chroot target is considered dangerous if: 1) the user has another way of gaining non-chrooted access to the system 2) is able to create hardlinks to setuid-binaries outside of the chroot tree 3) there are bugs somewhere that allow privilige escalation or remote execution of other programs While all these

On Wed, July 22, 2020 21:47, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Are you using DLZ_BIND9? There is a bug where it doesn't know the locking rules for those files. No. I am using the internal dns service. > Otherwise, work out which commend it is waiting on (the child) and > what lock that is waiting on (lslocks on linux is what I used to > debug this stuff). There does not appear to be

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 711273 xen-utils-common Bug #711273 [xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64] xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64: Acn't re-create domains after migration from 4.1 to 4.2 Bug reassigned from package 'xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64' to 'xen-utils-common'. No longer marked as found in versions xen/4.2.1-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed

I did not find any clues when 'googling' and could not find any search options on the archives. So, your answer does really not help. If you can help me with some reference, then it is highly appreciated. I would like to understand the rationaly. Not why 'it is just like it is'. No, why. What is the reasoning behind it. I speak Dutch, English, some Japanese and C. So, I can

Changes since v1: - Include nic,net2,vkb,vfb init functions --- This allows libxl users to get some sane default values for this complex set of structures. This is purely code movement and there are no functional changes except for a trivial error handling change in nic device init. Signed-off-by: Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@citrix.com> diff -r efe2d3ea22ae tools/libxl/libxl.c ---

Hi Thomas, I don't know if you like top or bottom quoting. That seems to be a big-little endian thing ;-) So, I will top quote and inline quote. Please see my comments inline, below. Kind regards, Stephan On 02/19/2015 04:18 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/19/2015 03:07 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: >> Hello Icecast-dev, >> >> I am new to

I have followed this bug report only to wind up in a similar predicament. The Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' was fixed by installing xen-qemu-dm-4.0. However the same configuration issue (trying to boot the guest from a CD) with the 'boot' option exists for me too. Your configuration looks good unless I've missed something. Shall we file a new

Hello I have a Supermicro system with Intel XEON cpu with VT enabled. HVM, without Windows PV driver, works great. I am trying to use Windows PV driver from XCP 0.5, it is in the .iso file of XCP 0.5 Filename: windows-pvdrivers-xensetup.exe I have tried - XEN 3.4.3 (Linux 2.6.18.8) - XEN 4.0.1-rc6-pre (Linux 2.6.31.x and Linux 2.6.32.x from Jeremys GIT) and - XEN 4.0.1-rc6 (Linux 2.6.31.x and

Hi, On 02/19/2015 03:40 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: > I don't know if you like top or bottom quoting. That seems to be a > big-little endian thing ;-) > > So, I will top quote and inline quote. playing it safe, ha! > Please see my comments inline, below. > > Kind regards, > Stephan > > > On 02/19/2015 04:18 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: >>

Hi, I'm raising the issue, again, of those pesky thin lines that show up with a pdf graphics device, otherwise known as FAQ 7.36. I have read the FAQ and understand that I can eliminate them by adjusting the anti-aliasing option for viewing them on the screen, but this doesn't necessarily eliminate them for a print device or for transferring them into a powerpoint or similar type of

Hello, Is there any security reason why the last component of a chroot path is required to be owned by root and not by the user that is chroot-ed into that path? I have tried to think of a reason, but cannot find any except for when several accounts are chrooted into the same directory. But if that is not the case, then, is there any security consideration? If not, then it seems to me that

vfb: Add opengl option (and replace bogus vncpasswd copy in xenapi_create in the SDL case) Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com> diff -r 2ad29c586d49 tools/python/xen/xend/XendConfig.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendConfig.py Tue Mar 18 14:36:27 2008 +0000 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendConfig.py Tue Mar 18 15:16:47 2008 +0000 @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ # Xen API