similar to: Bug#591456: xen-utils-common: The script hotplugpath.sh is missing in /etc/xen/scripts

I changed the suggested line in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp configuration file, but the errors about the file hotplugpath.sh are still present. root at eliott:~# /etc/init.d/xend start Starting Xen daemons: xenstored xenconsoled xend/etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 20: /etc/xen/scripts/hotplugpath.sh: No such file or directory /etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 20:

Is there a fix for this in the works/coming for squeeze or do I have to patch the package myself? If so, how? Thanks, a grateful Debian user that hasn't patched packages yet! Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20101122/8433308c/attachment.htm>

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.4-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, While updating my xen package today, I was prompted with a config file conflict. --- /etc/xen/scripts/hotplugpath.sh 2013-04-28 01:51:20.899778510 +0800 +++ /etc/xen/scripts/hotplugpath.sh.dpkg-new 2013-04-19 19:39:55.000000000 +0800 @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@ SBINDIR="/usr/sbin" BINDIR="/usr/bin"

Hello List, why is the Bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591456 not fixed yet? It was already reported back in 2010 and a patch was already supplied, too. Is this a bigger deal? Thanks, Mario

FYI: This bug also breaks user supplied scripts (/etc/xen/scripts/block-*) that are needed to handle block device mounting other than "phy:" and "file:" disks. See attached email from debian-user mailing list. cheers -henrik -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Henrik Langos <hlangos-debian at innominate.com> Subject: Re:

-----Original message----- From: Paul Muster paul@muster.dyndns.info Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:29:37 -0500 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-users] The script hotplugpath.sh ismissing in/etc/xen/scripts > On 13.10.2011 01:52, Barry Kolts wrote: > > > What I did, following the instructions on the last page > > Paul referred to, is add "deb

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:23 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote: > > The patches have been backported and are available in 4.6.1-9 from > virt-xen-testing. Please test it and report any problems here. > Thanks for the notice. It doesn't look like the fix went in. See below: # yum repolist | grep xen centos-virt-xen-testing CentOS-6 - xen - testing

Hi, today I've lost few hours tracking down why the hell a brand new Debian Squeeze with Xen 4.0 wasn't starting up HVM instance and finally I found this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591456 Despite it have been fixed in sid more than six months ago, Squeeze still contain this high priority bug. It's expected to get an update in stable or we should

Me again I've downloaded the xen source from thexen.org and browsing for hotplugpath.sh give me no result, so I guess is not a Debian bug but rather xen bug.

Further investigation revealed that hotplugpath.sh is an autogenerated script so it's a Debian bug. Thank You

Hi we have a Samba-Winbind 3.5.10 and i have a big quantity of errors in logs : [2012/09/24 16:01:29.248286, 1] winbindd/winbindd_ads.c:728(lookup_usergroups_memberof) lookup_usergroups_memberof ads_search member=CN=TESTDD,OU=Villeurbanne,OU=ExEA,DC=ELIOTT,DC=fr: Out of memory [2012/09/24 16:03:38.498533, 1] libads/ldap_utils.c:323(ads_ranged_search_internal) could not pull first

I run my production DomU''s using Xen 3.4.1 at the moment with the old 2.6.18.x dom0 kernel. I just built a new Xen version (4.0.1-rc5) with jemerys git repo of 2.6.32.16 dom0 pvops kernel. When starting domains the go instantly into a paused state and eventually i see this error on the command line. [root@host test1]# xm create -c vps.config Using config file

Hello all, I have a problem getting a working VNC console for HVM guests on Xen 4.1. When I start the DomU with xm create everything is fine the DomU runs and in xm list it has the running state but when I try to connect to the VNC console to install an operating system (Ubuntu and Debian I have tested) the VNC viewer only shows a black screen. So I searched in the logs and found a log entry

Hello everyone, I''m using shorewall successfully on many servers withount any problems and I''m really happy with this great piece of software. But now I ran into a problem with shorewall 3.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06 running on a vServer. The provider uses virtual interfaces like eth0:vs01 for the customers. The interface eth0 cannot be touched. I''ve read the instructions

I had another look at this and found the source of the problem - the reason why XEN_SCRIPT_DIR is not set: The hotplugpath.sh file is missing in the package. In the "rules" file the "install" target includes this line: $(MAKE) -C $(BUILD_DIR)/tools/hotplug/Linux install-udev install-scripts UDEV_RULES_DIR=/lib/udev/rules.d The problem is that make is never run in the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 Nothing Earth-shattering here and there is no reason to upgrade if you are not seeing one of the corrected problems. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems corrected in version 2.0.10 1) The

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:43 PM Vasiliy Tolstov <v.tolstov@selfip.ru> wrote: Hi Vasiliy, > > ср, 10 апр. 2019 г. в 19:46, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@rubenkerkhof.com>: > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:44 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 4/9/19 11:35 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:10 PM

shorewall-users hi,ALL I have a firewall have three interface, one NIC is internal (eth0), second NIC is SSN(eth2), and other NIC is external(eth1), on internal network have 10.0.1.59 and gw 10.0.1.163 eth0: 192.168.1.254/24 eth1: 10.0.1.55/24 gw 10.0.1.163 I use shorewall''s proxyarp 10.0.1.59 eth1 eth0 no no that is OK. I saw /usr/share/shorewall/firewall, I

In kernel 2.6.31, the handling of the rp_filter interface option was changed incompatibly. Previously, the effective value was determined by the setting of net.ipv4.config.dev.proxy_arp logically ANDed with the setting of net.ipv4.config.all.proxy_arp. Beginning with kernel 2.6.31, the value is the arithmetic MAX of those two values. Additionally, a ''loose'' routefiltering

George, Thanks a lot for your investigation and feedback. I confirm it works as expected after the change you proposed. Cheers, -- exvito