similar to: [Fwd: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0 in debian packages?]

---------- Wiadomo?? przekazana dalej ---------- Od: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com> Data: 4 czerwca 2010 14:13 Temat: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0 in debian packages? Do: Thomas Goirand <thomas at goirand.fr> DW: "xen-devel at lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel at lists.xensource.com> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Thomas Goirand wrote: > ?ukasz Ole? wrote:

# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> # Date 1300271932 0 # Node ID 7e326d27d899a3133479c8b7c983f660cdeda48c # Parent f35234b6636a0410a7d5eaa409e98ebe59080e4f tools: do not link against unused libraries. A fair few things under tools link against libraries which they don''t even use. Most of this appears to come from copy-and-pasting previous Makefile

On 08 ??? 2014, at 22:31, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote: > On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >> On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>>> dget -x >>>> >>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blktap/blktap_2.0.90-3.dsc >>>

On 09/09/2014 05:15 AM, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On 08 ??? 2014, at 22:31, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote: > >> On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>> On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>>> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>>>> dget -x >>>>> >>>>>

On 09/08/2014 04:59 PM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: > On 2014-09-08 10:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 09/07/2014 01:44 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >>> dget -x >>> >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blktap/blktap_2.0.90-3.dsc >> >> Uploaded! Thanks for your contribution to Debian. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Thomas

Oh, it''s also in debian official repositories. Ok, i''ll try it! --------- Original Message -------- Da: "Thomas Goirand" &lt;thomas@goirand.fr&gt; To: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" &lt;xen-users@lists.xensource.com&gt; Oggetto: Re: SV: [Xen-users] HyperVM Data: 11/06/09 14:22 mattias wrote: &gt; yes &gt;

Your message dated Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:00:07 +0000 with message-id <E1UOSj1-0002As-63 at franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#693137: fixed in swift-plugin-s3 1.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #693137, regarding ITP: swift-plugin-s3 -- swift3 (S3 compatibility) middleware plugin for swift to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

On 10/09/13 14:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: >> Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >>> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new >>> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. >>> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for

On 11/14/2011 07:43 AM, Jon Ludlam wrote: > On 12 Nov 2011, at 09:17, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 11/12/2011 12:16 AM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote: >>> Secondly, there are a few more things that need to be done to your >>> blktap >>> packaging prior to uploading: >>> >>> * The xen-org/blktap.git repository builds and works for amd64 >> >>

On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new >> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. >> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are >> different, and just using upstream 1.6

(CC'ing George Shulkin, and the #680102 bug list) On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Goirand <thomas at goirand.fr> wrote: > Hi Mike and Jon, > > It would be really nice if you could have a look at these 3 pending > issues in the Debian bug tracker: > > #675052: xe vm-memory-target-set does not write target to xenstore > #678723: vif-interfaces added to database

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I have uploaded xen-api/1.3.2-13, which corrects 2 things: the hostname change script was designed by CentOS, so I've fixed that, and also, the init script was hanging waiting forever if the xen-api host was a slave node, so I added a test in the init script, thanks to a patch

Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:54:52 +0000 Source: xcp-storage-managers Binary: xcp-storage-managers Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: PKG-Xen Devel <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> Description:

Hi, I just wanted to give a bit of feedback here. i have tried the Xen amd64 kernel from the kernel team and it just crashes with a stack dump on my laptop (thinkpad t500, that is a quite new stuff but will be a common thing very soon I beleive). Then I have tried the kernel 2.6.27 from the Xen repository that you can find here: http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6.27-xen.hg It's

Package: release-notes Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, I've worked-out a patch for the English release-notes. It consist of few advice on what to do to have a smooth upgrade to Squeeze when running Xen. This has been reviewed for both content and English correctness (thanks to Martin's great help here). Please consider including this text in the Squeeze release-notes, Cheers, Thomas

Hi, I'm trying to solve this one: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615797 As much as I can tell, and unless I have missed something, the issue is a missing -lpulse in the Makefile.target (see attached diff file that fixes the issue). While my patch makes it compile again, I fear that I'm not doing well, and that there must be a better way to fix, that would take care of

Hi, I'm trying to solve this one: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615797 As much as I can tell, and unless I have missed something, the issue is a missing -lpulse in the Makefile.target (see attached diff file that fixes the issue). While my patch makes it compile again, I fear that I'm not doing well, and that there must be a better way to fix, that would take care of

Hi, Can you please let me be a project member, and if possible, project admin too, since I'm working on the XAPI and Xen packaging with Ian Campbell (who is also a DD) and other people at Citrix? I guess it would make sense to also have Ian Campbell and Bastian Blank as project admins, since they are also active DDs for the Xen packaging. I haven't seen you active in this project. Are

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --

Dear Debian kernel team, I have backported (well, in fact, manually applied) Dan Williams patch (who is the maintainer of IOAT upstream) for the Debian 3.2 kernel. Please apply this patch. Note that I have tested it, and that I can confirm (as others did) that the issue is fixed after applying. This patch will be (or has already been?) applied upstream. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)