similar to: Bug#573210: tracedumps from vcpus when domU crashed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "Bug#573210: tracedumps from vcpus when domU crashed"

2010 Mar 12
0
Bug#573210: Latest kernel vulnerable too
Hi, Now I must confirm that bug is present in latest kernel from security updates. One domU locked about one minute after start. -- Ond?ej Kunc spr?vce serverov? farmy CZOL media interactive s.r.o. S?dlo: Moul?kova 2238/1, Praha 5, 15000 Kancel??e: Na Mor?ni 5357, Chomutov, 43001 Telefon: +420 723 137 981 E-mail: ondra at czol.eu URL: www.czol.eu, www.cz-hosting.com
2010 Mar 14
0
Bug#573210: Workaround: Using 2.6.18 leads to whole server crash
Hi, this night one domU crashed, so I managed to try workaround from Pasi to use kernel from etch ... but I need 2.6.26 in dom0 (drivers for sata controller) and so that I changed kernel only for domUs to 2.6.18-6-amd64. With this configuration server crashed after ten minutes. It was totally frozen so I had to restore previous state, but now I don't know what to do now. It's
2010 Mar 09
1
Bug#573210: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64: Xen domU sometimes hogs CPU and doesn't respond
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi, Recently I've experienced some crashes of Xen domU (also debian Lenny, running same kernel as dom0 (linux-image-2.6.26-xen-amd64)). At xm top that domain appears as running, but hogs all CPUs, because this problem has appeared on two identic servers (Supermicro X7SBi,
2006 Nov 23
0
Error while transfering large files
Hi, I'm using rsync to backup my data from my Linux machine (SUSE10.1) and Windows (XP) I've mounted a windows share on my linux and I'm trying now to copy files to the windows with rsync. The windows share is a NTFS filesystem It's all working except I have a error on large files. This is the command that I'm trying: rsync -a --no-o --delete
2010 Mar 12
4
Can not enable sip debug because CLI flooded
Hello list, I have nat=no and qualify=no in my sip peer definition and still my CLI is flooded with : [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (30ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (24ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26]
2010 Mar 12
2
Fwd: Switchvox SOHO 4.5 is Here
If you are having trouble reading this email, read the online version<http://now.eloqua.com/es.asp?s=491&e=78675&elq=55426a8b6c714f5bb6f2bf4b5d37bf55> . <http://app.en25.com/e/er.aspx?s=491&lid=215&elq=55426a8b6c714f5bb6f2bf4b5d37bf55> Dear Lito, *The information in this email is given to you in advance to make you aware of an impending product release
2010 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] Internship in LLVM development in Nokia Research
Hi all, Nokia Research Center, Finland is looking for an exceptional research intern for 4-12 months internship. This is a paid internship position either in Helsinki or Tampere, Finland. The team is developing a novel programming model and LLVM based compiler for the language to be used in real-time signal processing application implementations. To apply for this position, you have a M.Sc., MA,
2010 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] Question: overloaded intrinsic
I am working on an implementation that needs to add a couple of overloaded intrinsics (based on pointer to different address spaces). I am creating a new myintrinsics.td file and using the iPTRAny for the argument type. The current interface (i.e. getName() and getTyp() in Intrinsics.h) seems to require the caller to know which arguments are used for overloading, so to set Tys and numTys. This
2010 Mar 12
0
Regarding - P-Asserted identity and Privacy - SOLVED
Hi All, I got this figured out, when the privacy is ON at the other end of the server and when we get the Invite message to the server connected to PRI's, just take the details from the invite message in the Dial plan and send the calls as anonymous: exten => _1NXXXXXXXXX,n,Set(PRIVACY=${SIP_HEADER(Privacy)}) exten => _1NXXXXXXXXX,n,ExecIf($["${PRIVACY}" =
2010 Mar 12
1
t38 ATA
Hello, I need a hand in choosing a small ATA, even with one FXS port, that should do only fax with T38. I've tried Grandstream (ht286 model) but the faxes go out without ECM, even if the Fax machine has ECM enabled. Is there anyone that can recommend an ATA that might do the trick? Thanks, Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2010 Mar 12
0
modem config & pots & documentation
hi, i'm looking for documentation on configuring asterisk to work with a modem that should work with an analog line. i don't see the info in the handbook or reference manual or o'reilly's. any references and/or links, much appreciated. thanks. g. _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat
2010 Mar 12
0
[PATCH] auth_hash module
Hi all. Here is my first patch for icecast: auth_hash.diff - this patch created to generate unique URL's that gives access to listeners. It also privides GeoIP checking for radiostations, that have some restrictions to audience from other counties. Here is sample config: <mount> <mount-name>/live</mount-name> <authentication
2010 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Before/After IR Dumps
On Friday 12 March 2010 08:13:05 Kalle Raiskila wrote: > David Greene wrote: > > Here's a rework using PassManager as Chris suggested. Comments? > > Tried this second patch with the svn version 97812 (the one the patch is > made against), but it doesn't compile: > "llvm/include/llvm/Pass.h:127: Error: expected unqualified-id before "&" >
2010 Mar 12
2
Polycom not updating the directory list
Hi, I have a strange problem with all of our Polycom 550 & 650 phones. I am running a TFTP server on my Asterisk server and option 66 Boot Host pointing to Asterisk on my DHCP server. The auto-provisioning is working because the phones are registering correctly with their extension. If I change the MAC.cfg file to another extension and reboot the phone, it will reflect the new ext. The
2010 Mar 14
0
Processed (with 1 errors): My bugreport is duplicate, sorry
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 573210 linux-image-2.6.26-xen-amd64 Bug #573210 [xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64] xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64: Xen domU sometimes hogs CPU and doesn't respond Bug reassigned from package 'xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64' to 'linux-image-2.6.26-xen-amd64'. Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.26-xen-amd64'
2010 Mar 12
1
patch: allow proxy to lookup host by name
This patch allows the dovecot proxy processes to lookup the destination host by name instead of IP address. Tested agains 1.2.10, expected to work against 1.2.11. The patch is pretty straightforward, it's making it work within the restrictions of the login process that's more interesting. I have made some changes to the wiki (pending approval) to - enhance the discussion of proxy
2010 Mar 11
2
Codec preference
How can I set the prefered codec between 2 calling parties ?? My Grandstream supports G729, alaw and gsm... in this order. The Zoiper softphone has alaw and gsm as codecs... in that order. Although there should be a matching codec found, my Grandstream can not call the Zoiper softphone. CLI shows : [Mar 11 17:47:21] WARNING[22367]: channel.c:3340 ast_channel_make_compatible: No path to
2010 Mar 10
1
dtmf payload 100
Hello, I encountered the dtmf problem between my asterisk box (1.4.23) and suppliers gateway (unknown vendor). I have dtmf mode set to rfc2833 and it alway worked till supplier has changed something. Now I receive from him dtmf payload 100. With the second supplier which sends dtmf with payload type 101 everything works. in cli I get this message as dtmf is entered rtp.c:1287 ast_rtp_read:
2010 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] Let's -disable-post-ra for x86
Hi Jakob, It's not completely clear from your post, I think your chart is just for x86_64? What does it look like for x86_32? - Daniel On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > We are currently running the post-ra scheduler for x86 with -O3. It is not really clear that it is worth the compile time. > > X86 scheduling is a mystery
2010 Mar 12
3
[LLVMdev] Let's -disable-post-ra for x86
We are currently running the post-ra scheduler for x86 with -O3. It is not really clear that it is worth the compile time. X86 scheduling is a mystery that post-ra has not solved. I ran the nightly test suite on x86_64 with LTO enabled and -O3 with and without -disable-post-ra. Code generation is 10% faster overall with -disable-post-ra, and the runtime impact varies from a 17% speedup to a 17