similar to: Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 17 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed soon: - #536173 <http://bugs.debian.org/536173> xen-utils-3.4 need to depend on 3.4 version of xenstore - #536176 <http://bugs.debian.org/536176> xen-utils-3.4: trying xen-3.4 once

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for

=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-3: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #464969 <http://bugs.debian.org/464969> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: Linux mmap()/vmsplice() exploit causes memory map corruption in hypervisor regardless of domain privilege This is a

=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 292 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 292 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 258 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 258 days. This is a semi-automated mail. These mails are sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Hi Raphael, btw, are you 2 bugs today a simple coincidence with my linkedIn invitation yesterday? ;-) 2008/10/4 Raphael Geissert <atomo64 at gmail.com>: > Package: nut > Version: 2.2.2-8 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Attached is a patch adding "support" for tripplite's avr750u UPS. > Issues: > * productid still needs to be specified in

Package: xcp-xapi-debug Version: 1.3.2-11 Severity: normal User: debian-release at lists.debian.org Usertags: goal-dash Hello maintainer, While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making use of a bashism. checkbashisms' output: >possible bashism in

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-11 Severity: important User: debian-release at lists.debian.org Usertags: goal-dash Hello maintainer, While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making use of a bashism. checkbashisms' output: >possible bashism in

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-14 Severity: important User: debian-release at lists.debian.org Usertags: goal-dash Hello maintainer, While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making use of a bashism. checkbashisms' output: >possible bashism in ./usr/lib/xcp/lib/host-restore line

Package: blktap-utils Version: 2.0.90-1 Severity: important User: debian-release at lists.debian.org Usertags: goal-dash Hello maintainer, While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making use of a bashism. checkbashisms' output: >possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/vhdpartx line 40

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet! Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

xen source: lintian output: 'license-problem-gfdl-invariants stubdom/grub.patches/00cvs invariant part is: with no invariant sections, with the front-cover texts being a gnu manual, and with the back-cover texts as in (a) below', automatically rejected package. xen source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. xen-utils-4.11: lintian output:

These were flagged by the [Lintian] [spelling-error-in-binary] rule. [Lintian]: https://github.com/Debian/lintian [spelling-error-in-binary]: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/spelling-error-in-binary.html Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name> --- v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py | 4 ++-- v2v/rhv-upload-vmcheck.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Hai, ? We have noticed a depency that was missing in the latest 4.10.6 builds.? Affected are Debian Stretch and Buster. ? If you where running samba 4.10.5 and upgraded you might not?notice this problem. If you did not use samba-tool, you might not have noticed it. New installs?and people building from my sources did noticed it. ? Thank you guys for the reports ! @Marcio Demetrio Bacci

> On 30 March 2018 at 15:08 "A. Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote: > > > Hello, > > to build + packages dovecot I use the usual Debian tool chain. That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian. > > I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: > > I: dovecot-core:

Hai. I've finished the 4.7.8 package for Debian Stretch. You can find them in the repo stretch-unstable. (Note, these are not unstable, but a bad choice of words was made here.) This version is alligned with the debian samba patches up to 4.8.2, but adapted in this 4.7.8. The Build logs can be found here: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/stretch/ So, i've made a few