similar to: Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 17 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 9 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See

=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information

=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-3: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #464969 <http://bugs.debian.org/464969> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: Linux mmap()/vmsplice() exploit causes memory map corruption in hypervisor regardless of domain privilege This is a

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 292 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 292 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 258 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 258 days. This is a semi-automated mail. These mails are sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Hai, ? We have noticed a depency that was missing in the latest 4.10.6 builds.? Affected are Debian Stretch and Buster. ? If you where running samba 4.10.5 and upgraded you might not?notice this problem. If you did not use samba-tool, you might not have noticed it. New installs?and people building from my sources did noticed it. ? Thank you guys for the reports ! @Marcio Demetrio Bacci

> On 30 March 2018 at 15:08 "A. Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote: > > > Hello, > > to build + packages dovecot I use the usual Debian tool chain. That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian. > > I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: > > I: dovecot-core:

Here is a patch to the Debian xen-3 3.4.0-1 package that reenables ioemu. I have been using it for the last four weeks. (I understand there are reasons this cannot go into Debian yet, but hopefully it will be useful to people that depend on running HVMs today.) Anders -------------- next part -------------- --- xen-3/debian/changelog +++ xen-3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xen-3

Hai. I've finished the 4.7.8 package for Debian Stretch. You can find them in the repo stretch-unstable. (Note, these are not unstable, but a bad choice of words was made here.) This version is alligned with the debian samba patches up to 4.8.2, but adapted in this 4.7.8. The Build logs can be found here: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/stretch/ So, i've made a few

Hello, to build + packages dovecot I use the usual Debian tool chain. That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian. I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: I: dovecot-core: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/dovecot/auth N: N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N:

Hai Guys, ? The following has been done:?4.10.6?for Debian Buster (10) is ready. Short version of the changes: The settings are updated with latest Official Debian Samba packages, and its more focused on builds with python3. ? The changes logs of these changes, including the debian changes. ( see below ) Repo Info?: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ Buildlogs?: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/ ? ---?

Hi > My name is peter > > i would like to have a link exchange with your site http://lintian.debian.org> i have many gambling ralated sites pr 3-5 > i you are intrested please send me your sites list (that if you have more than one site) > so we castum a del that will benefit both of us > i you are not intrested in link exchange and you are selling links from your site >

I have uploaded a Debian GNU/Linux package for R-0.63.2 to the standard Debian mirrors (in the unstable distribution) and to the CRAN mirror http://cran.stat.wisc.edu/bin/linux/debian/2.1/ It should hit the other CRAN mirrors within two days. The lintian checker for Debian packages complains that this package was compiled with a bad libc. I have not been able to verify this. I think lintian

On 10/26/2011 05:29 AM, Mike McClurg wrote: > Perhaps you could send us a private deb file to test? I'm worried that > this might not be the right version that we need. Can you point us at > the upstream code you used? I used what was in the Git at: http://github.com/jonludlam/blktap.git The clone was made about a month ago, and it would be hard for me to tell when exactly. Adding

Hai...   Finaly im passed all errors, some problem with meself.. , some the code. ..    Lots of thank to the samba devs, that gave the clue to fix the last parts. :-)) whoehoe..   Its still in the stretch-experimental repo, and if the feedback is ok, i'll make the final build tomorrow. Testing can be done with Debian Stretch or Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 or Devuan ASCII AMD64 only.   #setup: get

Hai.   It did take some time, but here they are..  Debian Stretch Samba 4.7.0 Packages, rebuild from debian experimental, with small modifications. ( see changelogs below )   I've tested a bit with my new 4.7 debian samba package and it looks ok to me, but these first tests are in a clean environment. I did a upgrade from 4.5.8 to 4.7. AD and Member. ( samba + internal DNS was tested,