similar to: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Some of your Debian packages might need attention"

2007 Jun 22
1
Some of your Debian packages might need attention
Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for
2008 Mar 03
1
Some of your Debian packages might need attention
Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-3: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #464969 <http://bugs.debian.org/464969> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: Linux mmap()/vmsplice() exploit causes memory map corruption in hypervisor regardless of domain privilege This is a
2007 Sep 26
1
Some of your Debian packages might need attention
Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 292 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 292 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent
2007 Aug 23
0
Some of your Debian packages might need attention
Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 258 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 258 days. This is a semi-automated mail. These mails are sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to
2008 Aug 04
1
Possible problems in your Debian packages
=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information
2008 Jul 01
1
Possible problems in your Debian packages
=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry
2009 Jul 10
0
Possible problems in your Debian packages
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed soon: - #536173 <http://bugs.debian.org/536173> xen-utils-3.4 need to depend on 3.4 version of xenstore - #536176 <http://bugs.debian.org/536176> xen-utils-3.4: trying xen-3.4 once
2009 Oct 29
0
Possible problems in your Debian packages
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 17 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See
2010 Jan 13
0
Possible problems in your Debian packages
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 9 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See
2008 Jul 03
1
Bug#489106: xen-unstable: FTBFS: *** check_openssl_devel FAILED: missing openssl headers
Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.3-unstable+hg17879-1 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080702 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory
2006 Nov 13
2
Bug#398372: xen-utils-common: installation fails: ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory
Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-1 Severity: serious Justification: makes package uninstallable Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0.3-0-1) ... ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory
2011 Mar 13
1
Bug#618218: xen: FTBFS: make[3]: ps2pdf: Command not found
Source: xen Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-xen_4.0.1-2-amd64-2x64p6/xen-4.0.1/debian/build/build-docs/docs' > latex
2014 Dec 16
3
BLAS/LAPACK routine 'DLASCL' gave error code -4 in liblapack3 Version 3.5.0
Dear all Some computations gave a matrix. The single value decomposition of it worked fine previously, after an system upgrade I get the following error: ----- > La.svd(x,256,256) Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : BLAS/LAPACK routine 'DLASCL' gave error code -4 ----- Erroneous Matrix: ftp://usys-ftp.ethz.ch/ITES/STEP/nussbaum/R/matrix-lapack-error4.RData /.csv Operating System: Debian 8
2008 Jul 10
11
Xen status in lenny?
Hi, AFAIK, the status of Xen in lenny is currently the following: - no dom0 kernel - domU kernel only for i386 (no domU kernel for amd64) I was told (I don't remember where) that this is because the vanilla kernel only supports domU for i386, and has no dom0 support, so distros have to port the patches to their kernels (please correct me if I'm wrong). However: - etch shipped with dom0
2009 Jul 08
1
Problem with 1.2 and sieve: failed with unsuccessful implicit keep
Hi, First, thanks for this awesome piece of software. I've just upgraded to latest dovecot, aka 1.2. I've a problem. I've started using Sieve, and everything works fine, I already received a thousand of mails without any problem. However, there's one mail which is stuck in the postfix queue because of that: Jul 8 18:47:51 prometheus dovecot: deliver(jd at danjou.info):
2007 Sep 18
0
Bug#443024: xen-3: FTBFS: xc_core.c:195: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false
Package: xen-3 version: 3.1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debian/build/build-utils_i386/tools/libxc' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686
2006 Feb 16
1
r3 - trunk
Author: acid Date: 2006-02-16 10:45:13 +0000 (Thu, 16 Feb 2006) New Revision: 3 Modified: trunk/changelog trunk/control Log: - Change maintainer and add uploaders field - Prepare changelog for new upload Modified: trunk/changelog =================================================================== --- trunk/changelog 2006-02-15 23:05:09 UTC (rev 2) +++ trunk/changelog 2006-02-16 10:45:13
2006 Apr 12
2
Bug#362026: RM: xen -- obsolete, new splited xen packages upcoming
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, Please consider removing xen. New xen-3.0 splited packages are upcoming, making this one obsolete. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <julien@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // The more we fly, the more we climb, the more we know that heaven is a lie. -------------- next part
2006 Apr 05
3
Shall we release 3.0.1?
Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido
2006 Apr 10
3
3.0.2-testing packages for etch
Greetings Debian Xen team, I spent a weekend getting 3.0.2-testing building and thought i'd share the love. Manoj and I are already working to update make-kpkg for the new Xen architecture. My repo is at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/ I have posted a Breezy-centric howto for this build at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/README.txt Hope you enjoy it, and hope we can