similar to: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-3: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #464969 <http://bugs.debian.org/464969> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: Linux mmap()/vmsplice() exploit causes memory map corruption in hypervisor regardless of domain privilege This is a

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 292 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 292 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information

=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed soon: - #536173 <http://bugs.debian.org/536173> xen-utils-3.4 need to depend on 3.4 version of xenstore - #536176 <http://bugs.debian.org/536176> xen-utils-3.4: trying xen-3.4 once

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 17 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === xen-3: = There are 3 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/xen-3 = Lintian reports 9 warning(s), you should consider fixing them. See

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.3-unstable+hg17879-1 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080702 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-1 Severity: serious Justification: makes package uninstallable Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0.3-0-1) ... ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory

Package: xen-3 version: 3.1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debian/build/build-utils_i386/tools/libxc' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686

Source: xen Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-xen_4.0.1-2-amd64-2x64p6/xen-4.0.1/debian/build/build-docs/docs' > latex

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > close 443024 3.1.1-1 Bug#443024: xen-3: FTBFS: xc_core.c:195: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Hi, AFAIK, the status of Xen in lenny is currently the following: - no dom0 kernel - domU kernel only for i386 (no domU kernel for amd64) I was told (I don't remember where) that this is because the vanilla kernel only supports domU for i386, and has no dom0 support, so distros have to port the patches to their kernels (please correct me if I'm wrong). However: - etch shipped with dom0

Dear Madlene, while this list serves as a forum for discussions about R backports present on CRAN, this would be something preferably filed in the Debian bug tracking system bts.debian.org - could you file a bug there? But please don't ask me on which package - maybe Dirk has a good answer to that one... Cheers, Johannes P.S.: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Am Dienstag, 16.

Dear all Some computations gave a matrix. The single value decomposition of it worked fine previously, after an system upgrade I get the following error: ----- > La.svd(x,256,256) Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : BLAS/LAPACK routine 'DLASCL' gave error code -4 ----- Erroneous Matrix: ftp://usys-ftp.ethz.ch/ITES/STEP/nussbaum/R/matrix-lapack-error4.RData /.csv Operating System: Debian 8

Chris this question in private mail, and as it is a generally valid question, I resending my answere here (with Chris' approval). Cheers, Dirk Hi Chris, Always good to hear from a user. This would have a been a good question for the r-sig-debian list, many R users on Debian and Ubuntu lurk there, incl. our porters. On 25 September 2007 at 09:02, Chris Roat wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | I put

Xapian 1.4.2 can now be downloaded from: https://xapian.org/download The wiki has a summary of the most notable changes: https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/ReleaseOverview/1.4.2 A big thanks to the following people for helping to make this release a reality: Germán M. Bravo, Vivek Pal, Emmanuel Engelhart, Assem Chelli, Lucas Nussbaum, Alex Dunn, James Aylett, catkin, William Fulton. If I've

It's time we retired the Xapian 1.2 release series, but there were a few useful changes on the branch since the last release so I've rolled a final 1.2.25 release to push out those plus a few more fixes: https://xapian.org/download And with that, the 1.2 series is officially closed. If you've not already migrated to 1.4 or at least made plans to do so, it's time you did. Since