similar to: bridging and peth0

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "bridging and peth0"

2006 Dec 11
10
Dom0 network problem
Hello. I''ve just started with Xen and configuring Dom0. My hardware is Core2Duo based Xeon server and I installed Debian etch for amd64 architecture. The Xen related pachages installed are the following. linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 linux-modules-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64 xen-tools xen-utils-3.0.3-1 xen-utils-common My problem is that when xend is
2007 Aug 17
6
Gutsy Xen 3.1 2.6.22-9-xen network-bridge problem
Hi, I have a strange problem with my networking setup. I read all forums around the world where people had similar problems, but couldn''t find a solution. I have an Attansic L1 gigeth chip on my mainboard. This chip works OK in stock Ubuntu Gutsy (development) 2.6.22-9-generic kernel. When I boot into Xen, and after the bridge is created, the network stops working. Some info: - If I
2006 Jan 28
3
Shorewall/Xen setup (correct from-address this time)
(if this post gets line-feed-mangled please read http://www.dl.reneschmidt.de/shorewallxenpost.txt - that''s an unmangled version, thank you) Hello, first I would like to thank the Mr. Eastep and contributors for this great piece of software and superb documentation. I have a SOHO server (Debian testing) that I''m using for several purposes so I''ve set up a Xen
2008 Sep 09
2
No shared physical device in virt-manger on centos 5.2
I''m using xen-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1 on centos 5.2. When I installed centos 5.2 at first time, I could see shared physical device (xenbr0). but after updating virtualization package by yum, it disappeared... connection.py is patched at centos 5.2 release time. so I can''t find out what''s wrong.... bridge configuration is below and it''s normal state.
2006 Nov 08
4
bridge with IP address, "received packet with own address as source address"
Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0
2006 May 28
1
Virtual network interfaces not being created?
Hi there! I''m having some trouble getting networking going with Xen. When I first boot into the Xen kernel, I have two network interfaces (lo and eth0), both of which are configured correctly. When I start xend, peth0, vif0.0, and xenbr0 are added to the list. So far so good. When I actually instantiate a domain, no new vif entries are added to the list. If I try to bring up the
2006 Apr 28
2
Device 0 (vif) could nto be connected: backend device not found
Hi, I have seen many posts regarding this but have not found the soultion. So please cna someone shed some light on this Thanks - padma I get this error when I do try to create a domU guest (xen 3.0.0, 2.6.12.6). The vif is set to vif = [ '' mac=aa:00:00:00:11, bridge=xenbr0'' ] and a "brctl show" shows xenbr0 8000,fefffffff interfaces vif0.0 peth0 Xend.log
2008 Sep 03
6
eth0 on dom0 not working on a bridged conf
Hi, I''ve installed xen 3.0.3 from packages (xen-linux-system) on a debian etch, and i''ve configured it with network-bridge script in the default way (netdev=eth0, bridge=xenbr0, etc...) which is ok for me. the problem I have: I cannot ping any outer machine from dom0 (nor any outer machine can ping me). It gives me a "Destination Host Unreachable" message that
2007 Apr 22
1
shorewall Dom0 config using Xen's default setup -- correct?
Hi all, The first couple of xen machines we setup used the default xen bridging setup for dom0. I am sure there are many other people out there with this setup. Now that I know a bit more there are probably better ways out there to configure the xen box for firewalling, most notably assigning the red card to a domU and running shorewall in there. But in the meantime I would like to further
2008 Jan 31
3
xen 3.2 network problems
Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I
2010 Jun 13
5
domU Networking Issues
Hi, I have Xen 3.0.3 installed on CentOS 5.5 with 2 paravirtualized domU''s configured to use the default bridge networking and am having networking issues. If I boot the computer fresh I am able to ping dom0 and can SSH into it and start the domU''s. The following ping snippet demonstrates the problem. The first group of "Destination Host Unreachable" is while the
2006 Oct 27
10
"received packet with own address as source address"
Hello again, folks! I''m getting one strange problem with FC5 running on XEN 3.0.3 x64... The MRTG point to my machine with XEN running one absurd volume of output data sent (normal is around 6 MB/s) and when XEN is working we get 80 MB/s until my DRAC is alive... after this, the machine crash, DRAC stop do reply, swith stop do work together... Anyone knows whats happening now? ;)
2006 Aug 21
0
Fw:Xend start and after lose network
Objet : Xend start and after lose network Hi everybody : My configuration : Dapper 6.06 LTS with all updates Xen 3.0.2.2 My problem : After making ''xend start'', I lose network connections between my server and local network or internet. Nota : domU cas normally access to network I read about a similar problem in the bugtracker (N. 62) but it seems that this is normally
2006 Oct 27
9
strange VLAN / domu behavior
Hi there! I am currently setting up a Xen box on 3 VLans, each VLan interface is in a bridge and currently, dom0 is reachable from on of these and is performing great. My only problem is with domU : it can ping anything but it won''t work for TCP and UDP protocol UNLESS I do a manual tcpdump on my vlan interface. Bridges on dom0: xen-vl97 8000.001372529fbf no
2008 Feb 01
3
No peth interface for xenbr4 and xenbr5
Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"
2007 Jun 05
6
xen network Dom0
hi, i''ve tried again Debian testing, with xen 3.1 binary. it works fine but i can''t have the networt working: i''ve have an ethernet card with static IP: 172.20.2.160 gateway: 172.20.2.1 uname -r :2.6.18-xen without xen, the network works fine. here''s my output: eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:FE:6B:57:32 inet adr:172.20.2.160
2006 Jul 07
7
[PATCH] xenconsole fix
xenconsole fix. reference of tty->count in xencons_close() is racy. It must be protected by tty_sem semaphore like con_close() in drivers/char/vt.c -- yamahata _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2006 Mar 25
6
Cannot have eth0 in domU
Hello, I am trying to run Xen 3 on FC5, but I cannot have the eth0 interface appear in domU. I have 3 servers running FC3 and Xen 2 with various domUs since a year. Everything is fine on that front. I took one of the server, upgraded it to FC5 and did the following: - yum install xen kernel-xen0 kernel-xenU - grub.conf contains title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.2054_FC5xen0 root (hd0,0) kernel
2009 Aug 21
3
Debian & eth0 vs. peth0
It seems that with their specific Xen packages, Debian likes to go against the norm, and rather than calling the Xen bridging device something sensible like "xenbr0", they rename the main physical ethernet device "eth0" to "peth0" and create "eth0" as the Xen bridge (as far as I can tell, anyways). Anyone know where exactly they do this so I can reverse it?
2006 May 04
2
No networking in DomU - Ubuntu
Well where do I start...I have a domU (ubuntu) booting and appears well but I don''t have an eth0 listed at all, dom) looks good. DomU: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:06:5B:15:C5:0B inet addr:10.99.99.5 Bcast:10.99.99.7 Mask:255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::206:5bff:fe15:c50b/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1