similar to: Processed: your mail

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.2-3+hg9762-1 Severity: wishlist There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of xen-3.0_3.0.2-3+hg9762-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 > Build started at 20060922-0812 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), libcurl3-dev | libcurl-dev, python-dev, python

tags 389320 + wontfix thanks Xen just supports i386 and amd64 from upstream. No ia64 support is provided, as far as I know! Guido

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: normal I'm not an expert in networking but I think that the current setup when using network-nat for domains is insecure. I've configured : (network-script 'network-nat netdev=eth1') (vif-script vif-nat) So when only domain 0 is started, I get the following : # iptables -L -n Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 430778 + upstream Bug #430778 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: NAT scripts not generic enough, and made for DHCP ? Added tag(s) upstream. > tags 430676 + upstream Bug #430676 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: network-nat creates insecure nat POSTROUTING MASQUERADE ? Added tag(s) upstream. > tags 603366 + upstream Bug

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # changing olivier.berger at int-edu.eu to olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu > submitter 454347 ! Bug#454347: reconfiguring twiki won't change rewrite rules Changed Bug submitter from Olivier Berger <olivier.berger at int-edu.eu> to Olivier Berger <olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu>. > submitter 444448 ! Bug#444448:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 389320 xen Bug #389320 [xen-3.0] xen-3.0_3.0.2-3+hg9762-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: please add ia64 support Warning: Unknown package 'xen-3.0' Bug reassigned from package 'xen-3.0' to 'xen'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 3.0.2-3+hg9762-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > severity 589661 normal Bug #589661 [src:xen] xen: Binary-only NMU will FTBFS Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > retitle 589661 xen - fails with binary rebuilds Bug #589661 [src:xen] xen: Binary-only NMU will FTBFS Changed Bug title to 'xen - fails with binary rebuilds' from 'xen: Binary-only NMU will

On 6/28/19 10:23 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm observing an issue that as soon as libvirt starts, UPD broadcasts > going through physical network (and unrelated to any virtualization) get > broken. Specifically, windows neighbourhood browsing through samba's > nmbd starts suffering badly (Samba is running on this same box). > > At the moment

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box to act as a router for my college. There are two different types of users; students and conference guests, and they have IPs statically assigned by DHCP, from separate ranges (but they are on the same subnet). The students go out onto an academic connection (via eth0), and conference guests go out on an ADSL line (via eth3). eth1 and eth2 are configured for

Hi Daniel and Laine, [...] >> -A POSTROUTING -o br0 -j MASQUERADE >> -A POSTROUTING -o enp0s25 -j MASQUERADE >> -A POSTROUTING -o virbr2_nic -j MASQUERADE >> -A POSTROUTING -o vnet0 -j MASQUERADE > > *None* of those rules were added by libvirt (unless your build of [...] > You can verify my "counter-claim" by running "virsh net-destroy" for all

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 381481 xen-3.0 Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure Bug reassigned from package `aptitude' to `xen-3.0'. > retitle 381481 pthread_cond_timedwait does not wait enough Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure Changed Bug title. > severity 381481 important Bug#381481: pthread_cond_timedwait does not wait enough

Hello, I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were access the internet. The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the space so I deleted it. The second one, I created in /home/kvm, but deleted it as well when I couldn't access it FROM the

Hi all, I'm observing an issue that as soon as libvirt starts, UPD broadcasts going through physical network (and unrelated to any virtualization) get broken. Specifically, windows neighbourhood browsing through samba's nmbd starts suffering badly (Samba is running on this same box). At the moment I'm running a quite outdated version 1.2.9 of libvirt, but other than this issue,

Some day ago, a friend post one problem for mi. whist this texts: I have a server whit 2 interfaces of network, where eth0 is the interfaces connetc to internet and eth1 to the internal network. This server hace a Squid only, but i setting the iptables for protection to the server. Iptables run from script and in this script i setting the redirection for the other server in my internal network to

I have a server whit 2 interfaces of network, where eth0 is the interfaces connetc to internet and eth1 to the internal network. This server hace a Squid only, but i setting the iptables for protection to the server. Iptables run from script and in this script i setting the redirection for the other server in my internal network to port 80 and 443. I follow the diferent how to and many manual, but

Hello guys I don''t know if this thing has been posted before (if it was , please forgive me). I have 7 computers at home and I want all of them to have access to the internet. In order to do that , I set up a linux router (2 network cards) as a usual router (eth0 : 82.77.69.75 - internet connection ; eth1 : 192.168.10.1 - local network) . The other computers have ips ranging from

Okay here is my setup: Gentoo Box running 2.6.4 w/ 4 NICs 1 NIC is for internal network 3 NICs are for external network The machine has a static address assigned to the internal network nic. This nic runs dhcp and dns forwarding. The other 3 nics have external dynamic IP addresses. All will have the same gateway. There are 3 NICs because this is a very large pipe, that will only allocate a

The last two router/firewall servers I had used Slackware and Gentoo. I'm used to writing complete and explicit iptables rules; however, when I set up /etc/sysconfig/iptables in CentOS 7 my usual syntax is unusable. For example, I'm used to stating postrouting masquerade as: /usr/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 10.10.10.0/24 -j MASQUERADE But when I use the rule above,

Hi, I''ve setup a gateway using multiple default gateways and netfilter MASQUERADE to load balance traffic between two DSL interfaces and one dedicated link, and when I try to download something big, or when I''m using MSN (both in clients under this gateway), sometimes, or most times, after a while the connection timeouts. The connection doesn''t seem to change its

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.