similar to: Xen 3.1 in unstable?

Hi, I see that there aren't AMD64 packages in unstable. Is ti related to this bug? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439662 In ubuntu it compiles on amd64. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen-3.1/3.1.0-0ubuntu15 Is there collaboration between debian xen team and ubuntu xen team? Regards, -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? -

Hi, this morining I was trying to compile xen 3.1 on my Debian Etch (AMD64). I have a little problem with gcc-multilib. It depends on many packages that don't exist in Etch. So I brutally remove it from debian/control and then dpkg-buildpackage. There was some warning on compilation: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format

Hi, I have updated my debian etch and it stop booting with xen. I see the new 2.6.17 kernel in unstable and so I have installed it but also this doesn't work (it reboots during boot). -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? - http://www.openformats.org * Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org

Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all

Hi, I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs 3.8.14) The bug report says fixed in glusterfs-3.12.2-1 Is there a plan to backport the fix to 3.10.x releases or the only way to fix is upgrade to 3.12? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number > of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the > 30th of Apr instead. > > Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? > Hi, yes, it's this: https://review.gluster.org/19730

Fix that when scrub tries to repair an I/O or checksum error and one of the devices containing the mirror is missing, it crashes in bio_add_page because the bdev is a NULL pointer for missing devices. Reported-by: Marco L. Crociani <marco.crociani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani < marcoc at prismatelecomtesting.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 > on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs

Hi, are there any news for 3.10.12 release? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >>> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >>> 30th of Apr instead.

Hi, this patch it's already available in the community version of gluster 3.12? In which version? If not, there is plan to backport it? Greetings, ??? Paolo Il 16/03/2018 13:24, Atin Mukherjee ha scritto: > Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at > release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at

Hi, We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the 30th of Apr instead. Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? Thanks, Shyam On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > Hi, > are there any news for 3.10.12 release? > > Regards, >

On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >> 30th of Apr instead. >> >> Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release?

I apologize, but I can not find a complete list of directives in dovecot.conf possible. where can I find? thanks excuse my for my orrible english -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Apri Conto Corrente Arancio entro il 28 febbraio 2011 e ricevi 100 euro da spendere su Media

Hi, I would like to realize a voip testbed that should simulate the scenario in which two companies have an asterisk PBX connected through a PRI-ISDN to the Telco operator. I have no experience of T1/E1 connection but I think that the above could be relized with 3 asterisk boxes equipped with Digium TE405P cards. One of the box will represent the Telco, the other two, the two companies PBX. I

I forgot tftp32 log. Here it is, starting from "default" file request: Connection received from 192.168.1.20 on port 57099 [31/05 10:51: 29.370] Read request for file <pxelinux.cfg/default>. Mode octet [31/05 10:51:29.370] OACK: <tsize=938,> [31/05 10:51:29.420] Using local port 1286 [31/05 10:51:29.420] Connection received from 192.168.1.20 on port 57100 [31/05

The BBC are currently trialling multicasting the Olympics. This requires multicast and IGMP to be available. As far as I can make out, in 2.0.8 at least, all multicast addresses are filtered out and, to my naive eyes, can''t be re-enabled. Please prove me wrong :-) Dirk -- Please Note: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Consumer Is Not Directly Observing This Message,

i have no idea how to definie for a parallel zone the host file if the second zone (net) should be the composition of the first zone (dmz). i tried all the following combinations in the interface and host files: interface: - eth0 - (variante 1) - eth0 192.168.0.255,255,255,255,255 (variante 2) - eth0 192.168.0.255,!192.168.0.255 (variante 3)

(Sorry, third time -- last one, promise, just giving it a subject line!) OK, a second machine hosted at the same hosting company has also apparently been hacked. Since 2 of out of 3 machines hosted at that company have now been hacked, but this hasn't happened to any of the other 37 dedicated servers that I've got hosted at other hosting companies (also CentOS, same version or almost),

Caller*ID used to work as some point, but I can't seem to get it going these days. The card is a x101p. I've tried going up and down the rxgain scale. Can the txgain effect it at all? When I plug in a phone into the line with a splitter it can decode caller id with no problems. Reading through the mailing list archives hasn't given me any move clues. Any ideas?