similar to: Xen support patch for package `bridge-utils' available

Hello! I recently upgraded a number of Debian testing packages (three days ago) and just now rebooted the system, with the effect that the Xen domUs don't know their `eth0' devices anymore: #v+ # ifconfig eth0 eth0: error fetching interface information: Device not found #v- I'm using xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae 3.0.3-0-2 and upgraded linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686 from

Hello all, I am new to Linux Ethernet bridging. Let me first start with what I am trying to achieve. Well you see - I am attempting to have 2 main firewall running at the same time - one as a master and the other one as a slave. Yes, I would like to make use of Ethernet bridging in this scenario - as I understand it, all I need are two machines and STP enabled. I am running Debian

Hi, Sorry of this is the wrong list, trying to find some help. I am trying to set up 2 KVM hosts using Debian 9 (connecting to a 3 node Centos 7.4 gluster cluster) To get the bandwidth I have bonded 2 NICS each end. However while the network works fine for the Debian VM host the VM guests cannot connect/get an IP using DHCP connecting to br0. (Same setup on the Centos end works fine however)

Package: udev Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Hello! When installing the udev package in a Xen domU, ``strange'' things happen. The following is a bit of guesswork, some hard facts are probably missing, but I hope that the udev and / or Xen maintainers can make some sense out of it. I'm for now happy with having a usable Xen server again...

I can’t seem to find info about layer 2 tinc tap interface bridge with local physical nic. I have successfully created two nodes configuration with tinc acting as switch. My problem is ethernet packets only flow between two nodes and not to hosts on bridged nic. Example: Server 1 - eth0 bridged with tinc tap device, then bridge gets IP via dhcp server on physical nic subnet. Server 2 - local

Hi, I'm not sure but I think I suffer under the same problem with a bit different setup with squeeze testing and xen 4.0rc5. In fact I'm using bridges in the dom0 and the connections to the domU get lost sporadically. In don't see where's a solution to the problem... Is it now a bug? When it's an iptables bug, where's the corresponding bug in the iptables bugtracker

Hello! I've faced a weird problem. And I totally can't understand how libvirt handles networks. The thing that i need to do is simple. I create a bridge in my ubuntu host, the following config: *iface eth0 inet manual* * * *auto br0* *iface br0 inet dhcp* * bridge_ports eth0* * bridge_stp on* * bridge_maxwait 0* That's OK, and my bridge turns up automatically. But I don't

Hi, I'm not in the list and I just would like to comment it to the comunity. So, if someone want to contact me, make CC to me in the reply. The wiki page [1] talk about networking, and show two typical configurations: "virtual network" and "shared physical device". The shared physical device has an error or something that could make confused, I think. What I want to

Hello guys, maybe you can help me with following issue. I have created a little cloud with a host and two worker nodes using opennebula. The setup went successfully until now, I am able to create VM's and move them via normal and live migration. Another (possibly) important information is that I configured my virtual bridge on both worker nodes like this: auto br0 iface br0 inet static

I followed the bridged information in the documentation but I don''t seem to be getting any traffic across the bridge. Below are the relevant configuration files. I have tried many things already to no avail. I am running on a debian sarge/sid system with shorewall 2.0.13. The "external" network is on eth0 and the internal network is connected to eth1. The bridge and physdev

Hopefully this is a simple answer. I am new to setting up bridges on a linux system. Here is what I have set up: Laptop directly connected to the eth0 port on the bridge (A Soekris 4521 board). The otherside of the bridge is a wirelass lan card (SMC2532b-w) as wlan0. The wlan0 is setup in managed mode to communicate to my test ap2000. When I do a 'brctl showmacs br0' on the

On 12/14/2013 10:51 AM, scar wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: >> I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which >> bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? > > well i don't quite understand bridges and their function, i'm kinda > just following directions.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: > I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which > bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? well i don't quite understand bridges and their function, i'm kinda just following directions. br0 replaced eth0 though in my interfaces file according to this guide[1] i

On 12/16/2013 04:47 AM, Gao feng wrote: > On 12/14/2013 10:51 AM, scar wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: >>> I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which >>> bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? >> well i don't quite understand bridges

Hi all, First at all, excuse if this is not the right place for sending this email. I'm using ubuntu 14.04 server edition and i'm trying to deploy some virtual machines in a server in such a way that they are visible in the same network that the host machine. The tools I'm using are the uvtool package and libvirt. The error I'm getting is the following: "uvt-kvm: error:

Hi I am using virt-manager and created bridge at host . My host nw interfaces is auto br0 iface br0 inet static address x.x.x.178 network x.x.x.0 netmask x.x.x.x broadcast gateway x.x.x.x[gateway of eth0 earlier] bridge_ports eth0 bridge_fd 0 bridge_hello 2 bridge_maxage 12 bridge_stp off #dns-search google.com dns-nameservers x.x.x.x x.x.x.x with this config 1] net inside host is working 2]net

Starting a new Xen setup, with off-the-shelf Wheezy, and the standard Xen packages, which turn out to be Xen 4.1 I used to just put a (network-script network-bridge) in the Xen setup, but I guess you can''t do that anymore... There are a variety of recipes to setup the network and bridging, since apparently the Xen setup doesn''t does this for you anymore. I''ve gone

Bernd wrote: > > Laine wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of > > Laine Stump > > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge > > network

Hi all, I followed the guide "simple-bridging-with-dhcp", which has two parts: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/simple-bridging-with-dhcp-server-side/ http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/simple-bridging-with-dhcp-client-side/ I have altered two things to fit my needs, 1) DHCP server(host:pek1) is on client side ethernet, so I have bridged eth0 and tun1 together; 2) Network/Server/Client

I'm using ubuntu 12.04LTS I setup a bridged network: # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp auto br0 iface br0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 Seems to work. Then I created a virtual machine using Ubuntu's vmbuilder tool like so: vmbuilder