similar to: Bug#398372: xen-utils-common: installation fails: ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.3-unstable+hg17879-1 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080702 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11624-1 Severity: important The packages fails to install with the following error: Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0+hg11624-1) ... ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing xen-utils-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script

Source: xen Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-xen_4.0.1-2-amd64-2x64p6/xen-4.0.1/debian/build/build-docs/docs' > latex

Package: xen-3 version: 3.1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debian/build/build-utils_i386/tools/libxc' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686

Source: xen Version: 4.1.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[7]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware' > /usr/bin/make -C etherboot

Dear all Some computations gave a matrix. The single value decomposition of it worked fine previously, after an system upgrade I get the following error: ----- > La.svd(x,256,256) Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : BLAS/LAPACK routine 'DLASCL' gave error code -4 ----- Erroneous Matrix: ftp://usys-ftp.ethz.ch/ITES/STEP/nussbaum/R/matrix-lapack-error4.RData /.csv Operating System: Debian 8

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Hi, AFAIK, the status of Xen in lenny is currently the following: - no dom0 kernel - domU kernel only for i386 (no domU kernel for amd64) I was told (I don't remember where) that this is because the vanilla kernel only supports domU for i386, and has no dom0 support, so distros have to port the patches to their kernels (please correct me if I'm wrong). However: - etch shipped with dom0

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > tags 714794 - moreinfo Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 710035 - moreinfo Bug #710035

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > found 728743 331.20-1 Bug #728743 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated Bug #733816 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] khotkeys launches actions with SIGHUP blocked, leading to unclosable xterms Marked as

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for

=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-3: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #464969 <http://bugs.debian.org/464969> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: Linux mmap()/vmsplice() exploit causes memory map corruption in hypervisor regardless of domain privilege This is a

=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 292 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 292 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was debian at abeckmann.de). > usertags 669005 piuparts Bug#669005: uninstallable on sid (might just need require a rebuild) There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: piuparts. > affects 669005 + shogun-python-static shogun-python-modular

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25 > tags 398372 pending Bug#398372: xen-utils-common: installation fails: ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Bug#393968: xen-utils-common: fails to install

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.2-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts

Package: xcp-guest-templates Version: 0.1-4 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts

Dear Madlene, while this list serves as a forum for discussions about R backports present on CRAN, this would be something preferably filed in the Debian bug tracking system bts.debian.org - could you file a bug there? But please don't ask me on which package - maybe Dirk has a good answer to that one... Cheers, Johannes P.S.: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Am Dienstag, 16.