similar to: boot crash 2.6.16-18 xen kernel

I was giving a try to Debian Xen packages (it looks very promising by the way ; I just happen to love the ? new ? grub which handles xen images, for instance!) ; I have a box which boots correctly with xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386_3.0.2+hg9697-2 and a 2.6.16 dom0 kernel, but crashes when trying to boot linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-686_2.6.17-7 The result is the same on two boxen (my Pentium M laptop and a

Xen 3.2.1-rc1 64 bit Dom0: 2.6.16.33 PAE DomU: 2.6.18.8 (from a pull a few weeks ago) If you need the symbols, there from the same Xen I linked to in my post from a few days ago... (XEN) mm.c:3498:d4 ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e() (XEN) Unhandled page fault in domain 4 on VCPU 0 (ec=0003) (XEN) Pagetable walk from 00000000c08187f0: (XEN) L4[0x000] = 00000004dfa38027

Hi, Can anybody advise me how to debug this crash? it happens when I try to start a 32 bit kernel on my 64 bit Xen system, the kernel is my own using opensuse 11.1 rc1 2.6.27.7 xen patches, the kernel works as 32 and 64 bit dom0, and as 64 bit domU PV, is there a technique to find out where in the kernel source the crash happens? i.e what line in the source code? (XEN) mm.c:707:d49 Error getting

Hi,Chris? I wonder which version of Xen did the para-Linux works with. I applied the patches, compiled them and tried them on both xen-3.0.2 and the latest xen-unstable. Both result in panics when booting Xen and complain as follows: (XEN) Domain 0 kernel supports features = { 00000005 }. (XEN) Domain 0 kernel requires features = { 00000005 }. (XEN) (XEN)

Xen: 3.2.1-rc5 64bit Dom0: 2.6.18.8 (at cs 524) 32-pae DomU: 2.6.26-rc8 32-pae root at newark13:~# xm create -f /linodes/xencaker/xen.conf -c Using config file "/linodes/xencaker/xen.conf". Started domain xencaker root at newark13:~# root at newark13:~# xm dmesg ... (XEN) traps.c:413:d332 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] (XEN)

Hello. log of the crashing boot process: http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-14-xen331-linux-2.6.29-rc6-crash.txt 2.6.29-rc5 based pv_ops dom0 works on the same computer.. with the same Xen version. I tried with and without pci=nomsi. adding ''noapic'' doesn''t seem to help (I need that with 2.6.29-rc5 to make it work). Any ideas

Hi, We're using gmirror on our sun fire x2100 and FreeBSD 6.1-p10. Some days ago I found this in the logs: Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel: ad6: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=612960533 Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel: ad6: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51<READY,DSC,ERROR> error=10<NID_NOT_FOUND> LBA=612960533 Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel: GEOM_MIRROR:

Hi, current paravirt patchqueue dies with ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7) EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94 eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04

Hi, current paravirt patchqueue dies with ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7) EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94 eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04

Back in December, there was some discussion here about the Ultra 20''s bios being confused by the EFI labels ZFS uses. After seeing a report about the X2100 exhibiting the same behavior as the Ultra 20, I reproduced the problem and filed: 6407133 X2100 bios intimidated by ZFS-created EFI labels hopefully that bios will get fixed, too. - Bill

Hello all, I really appreciate the replies I've gotten about this so far (especially the support for wanting to run it on Solaris!). The core issue seems to have been missed, though -- is there any way to run a complete Asterisk solution on Solaris 10 (including music-on-hold and conferencing)? This probably comes down to a few issues: - Is ztdummy (a component of Zaptel) *really*

Hey, It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up. This used to work over the weekend, so I can only surmise it is one the three patches. This is with a debug=y build (which has been working nicely for the last month or more). It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up. This used to work a day ago - that is c/s 23551 worked nicely. ----- Forwarded message

Hi folks, I am having issues installing Centos 4.3 X86-64 on a Sun Fire X2100(AMD chip). It works with 2GB of ram just not 4 GB. It works with any combo of the 4 1GB chips I have. It only works with 2GB not 4GB any ideas? Thanks, Bill

Hello, world! I'm considering running Asterisk 1.2.4 on Solaris 10 on a Sun Fire X2100 server or two (Opteron CPU, nForce 4 chipset), and apparently this works. I've read that the Zaptel package won't work on anything other than Linux, since it's intended to hook into the Linux kernel in the form of a kernel module. This concerns me, since I've read that ztdummy, the

Mem: 2075040k total, 1331452k used, 743588k free, 50896k buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 144k used, 2031464k free, 1191532k cached SunFire X2100 running Centos 4.3. Linux maytag1.texoma.net 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL #1 Fri Jul 7 19:24:57 CDT 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux rgds/ldv

Hi, Does anyone know if it is possible to plug a tdm400p pci digium card into an pci-e 16x slot ? Is there a possibility to work? I have a sun fire x2100 which doesn't have pci slots. Does Digium make pci-e cards?

Hi all, a newbie question. I''m trying to install lenny guest image (in an img file) on my lenny Dom0 by following the http://wiki.debian.org/Xen: xm create -c xm-debian.cfg install=true install-mirror=ftp://ftp.XX.debian.org/debian i created the xen-lenny-image.img using dd, format is ext3. disk is defined as (cfg file): disk =

ZFS fans, Recalling our conversation about hot-plug and hot-swap terminology and use, I afraid to say that CR 6483250 has been closed as will-not-fix. No explaination was given. If you feel strongly about this, please open another CR and pile on. *Change Request ID*: 6483250 *Synopsis*: X2100 release notes inconsistent with Sun terminology, confuses customers Status: 11-Closed Substatus: Will

Hello Everyone, I have bumped into the thralling penguin page on linux vs solaris for asterisk. Does the benchmark still hold with the newer versions of kernels? Curious to know of your thoughts. Also, they mentioned running it on Sun Fire x2100, but no benchmarks were given for that. Can increased performance be accomplished simply by changing to Solaris or OpenSolaris? Kind Regards, Nick.

Hi, I've got a newly installed wine running on a Sun Fire X2100 and redhat. Now I want to compile some cpp-sources, but wineg++ ist aborted because it can't find the include windows.h. Is there a another include for wine? Any help? cheers teb