similar to: Bug#388352: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64: veth0 is missing

FYI: The status of the xen-common source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Current version: 3.0+hg11624-1 -- This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

xen-docs-3.0-unstable_3.0-unstable+hg11292-1_all.deb to pool/main/x/xen-unstable/xen-docs-3.0-unstable_3.0-unstable+hg11292-1_all.deb (new) xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-i386-pae_3.0-unstable+hg11292-1_i386.deb extra misc The Xen Hypervisor on i386-pae-class The hypervisor is the "core" for XEN itself. It gets booted by the boot loader and controls cpu and memory, sharing them

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Severity: normal After a recent etch upgrade (2.6.17, xen-3.0.2) I was unable to "xm create" until I "modprobe netloop nloopbacks=10" Error was network-bridge couln't create vif interface (backend not found). brctl addbr ... fails because of no free netloop device. passing more nloopbacks device to the module fixed the

Dear, "Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released. http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html Xenoppix-x86-64 exploits latest CPU (Intel Core2 Duo and AMD Athlon64). * Xenoppix-x86-64 boots both X86 and X86_64 linux kernel on HVM of Xen. * Xenoppix-x86-64 looks like KNOPPIX but all packages are replaced for X86_64. * Xenoppix-x86-64 also

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Severity: serious Justification: breaks unrelated services Freshly installed amd64 etch system. When running /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start, the system becomes completely unreachable from the network. Running ifconfig, I can see eth0 (which is the virtual interface now if I am correct), having the mac and IP address of the real eth0, and a

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 Your package fails to build with GCC 4.2. Version 4.2 has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors and give people an advance warning. The bug below is in your package though and not because I'm using a snapshot of the compiler so please take a look at it. You can reproduce this with the

Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

> > When you run xend it runs network-bridge which creates the bridge, > > renames eth0->peth0 and veth0->eth0 and brings the new eth0 back up. > > kewl, thx Ian. i see network-route doesnt do this. i think > thats a good thing. do you forsee that changing? I expect that in most routed configurations people use their own network script rather than using the

Hi, I''m using RHEL linux 5.1, I can''t add the another NIC to my virtual machine. # /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the loopback driver supports. If the loopback driver is a module, you may raise this limit by passing it as a parameter (nloopbacks=<N>); if the

> That''s great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1. You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and should be increased), but can be set on the command line. Ian > Em Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:30, John

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I'm new to the list. hopefully my question is correctly placed here... I'd installed my samba server 3.5.6 on debian squeeze in a openvz container that uses venet. I'd love to keep it that way but I'm not sure if that is ok. Do you use samba server with venet or do I have to change to veth? I already read http://wiki.openvz.org/Differences_between_venet_and_veth and I don't

> Hi. what creates veth0 and vifu.0, when? what''s the > underlying architecture behind them? Just trying to > understand the internals. netback/loopback.c creates them. It''s effectively a point to point link, allowing domain 0 to connect on to the bridge in the same manner that other domains do. (before, packets to domain 0 were short-cutted and came off the

FYI: The status of the xen-common source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 3.0+hg11292-2 -- This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

FYI: The status of the xen-unstable source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 -- This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

Hi list. I started with Xen yesterday, but I am facing a bit of a problem. My system had always configure eth0 with 10.0.0.4/8 I am using Xen unstable source (on Debian sid) Now I installed Xen, rebooted the machine, and first the usual network is coming up and then the xend will be started. I''ll end up with this, but I am wondering if this should be the way of things to be

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11624-1 Severity: important The packages fails to install with the following error: Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0+hg11624-1) ... ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing xen-utils-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script

# xm create -c vm01.cfg Error: Cannot open config file "vm01.cfg" www:/var/log/xen# xm create -c /etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg". Error: (22, 'Invalid argument') # xm log [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO (__init__:1072) Resource label file not found. [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO