similar to: debian xen packages : work with 2.6.16, reboots when loading dom0 with 2.6.17

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "debian xen packages : work with 2.6.16, reboots when loading dom0 with 2.6.17"

2008 Apr 06
3
Xen 3.2.1-rc1: ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e()
Xen 3.2.1-rc1 64 bit Dom0: 2.6.16.33 PAE DomU: 2.6.18.8 (from a pull a few weeks ago) If you need the symbols, there from the same Xen I linked to in my post from a few days ago... (XEN) mm.c:3498:d4 ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e() (XEN) Unhandled page fault in domain 4 on VCPU 0 (ec=0003) (XEN) Pagetable walk from 00000000c08187f0: (XEN) L4[0x000] = 00000004dfa38027
2006 Sep 22
0
boot crash 2.6.16-18 xen kernel
Hi, We are running a Sun Fire X2100 with 4GB RAM. We followed the how-to which we posted on http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/423, using backports packages for a k7-machine. We have one Sun Fire X2100 running a 2.6.16-16 kernel from backports, which is working fine having used the same how-to. Now we are installing another X2100 using the 2.6.16-18 kernel, which is giving some major
2008 Nov 30
2
(XEN) mm.c:707:d49 Error getting mfn 2fef3 (pfn 6aef3) from L1 entry
Hi, Can anybody advise me how to debug this crash? it happens when I try to start a 32 bit kernel on my 64 bit Xen system, the kernel is my own using opensuse 11.1 rc1 2.6.27.7 xen patches, the kernel works as 32 and 64 bit dom0, and as 64 bit domU PV, is there a technique to find out where in the kernel source the crash happens? i.e what line in the source code? (XEN) mm.c:707:d49 Error getting
2007 Apr 18
2
Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Hi,Chris? I wonder which version of Xen did the para-Linux works with. I applied the patches, compiled them and tried them on both xen-3.0.2 and the latest xen-unstable. Both result in panics when booting Xen and complain as follows: (XEN) Domain 0 kernel supports features = { 00000005 }. (XEN) Domain 0 kernel requires features = { 00000005 }. (XEN) (XEN)
2008 Jul 03
6
2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap
Xen: 3.2.1-rc5 64bit Dom0: 2.6.18.8 (at cs 524) 32-pae DomU: 2.6.26-rc8 32-pae root at newark13:~# xm create -f /linodes/xencaker/xen.conf -c Using config file "/linodes/xencaker/xen.conf". Started domain xencaker root at newark13:~# root at newark13:~# xm dmesg ... (XEN) traps.c:413:d332 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] (XEN)
2009 Mar 02
12
latest pv_ops dom0 (2.6.29-rc6) crashes / unhandled page fault
Hello. log of the crashing boot process: http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-14-xen331-linux-2.6.29-rc6-crash.txt 2.6.29-rc5 based pv_ops dom0 works on the same computer.. with the same Xen version. I tried with and without pci=nomsi. adding ''noapic'' doesn''t seem to help (I need that with 2.6.29-rc5 to make it work). Any ideas
2007 Apr 18
2
paravirt xen gpf
Hi, current paravirt patchqueue dies with ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7) EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94 eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04
2007 Apr 18
2
paravirt xen gpf
Hi, current paravirt patchqueue dies with ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7) EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94 eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04
2013 Jun 19
4
e008:[<ffff82c480122353>] check_lock+0x1b/0x45 [konrad.wilk@oracle.com: FAILURE 3.10.0-rc6upstream-00061-g752bf7d(x86_64) 3.10.0-rc6upstream-00061-g752bf7d(i386): 2013-06-19 (tst007)]
Hey, It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up. This used to work over the weekend, so I can only surmise it is one the three patches. This is with a debug=y build (which has been working nicely for the last month or more). It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up. This used to work a day ago - that is c/s 23551 worked nicely. ----- Forwarded message
2009 Jul 02
14
debian lenny domU installation
Hi all, a newbie question. I''m trying to install lenny guest image (in an img file) on my lenny Dom0 by following the http://wiki.debian.org/Xen: xm create -c xm-debian.cfg install=true install-mirror=ftp://ftp.XX.debian.org/debian i created the xen-lenny-image.img using dd, format is ext3. disk is defined as (cfg file): disk =
2008 Feb 07
6
Loading FreeBSD in an HVM-domain on Intel-based host with GRUB
Hello all, please tell me, is it possible (at least theoretically) to circumvent bug 622 [1] by using GRUB instead of /boot/loader to load FreeBSD kernel? Or it is silly idea: even if we bypass /boot/loader we will not be able to run FreeBSD kernel in a HVM-domain on a Intel-based host for some other reason? As far as I know, GRUB can''t load FreeBSD kernel directly, but only can
2008 Aug 21
2
doubt on releasing domain pages
Hi, I am trying to release domU pages from page_list and xenpage_list after domU shutdown while retaining the rest of the domain information. To achieve this in __domain_finalise_shutdown i call domain_relinquish_resources. This is failing to release pages from page_list for type PGT_l2_page_tables and crashing dom0. To be specific, while testing on mini-os i saw that when
2008 May 29
6
is it possible to build two privileged domain at boot time?
Hi All, I am not very familiar with xen details. Now I am thinking of building two privilged domain(domain 0 not driver domain) at boot time. The other question is that wether it is possible to create another domain 0 by domain-builder running in domain0? Does it make sense when domain 0 is shut down unexpectedly another domain 0 can run at once. Maybe it is absurd. I am looking forwards
2005 Aug 28
1
Arcoread7 secutiry vulnerability
Hi! cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me, cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit. On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote: > I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to
2006 Aug 26
0
Processed: Re: Bug#384638: Dom0 dows not boot with kernel package linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 version 2.6.16-18
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > severity 384638 important Bug#384638: Dom0 dows not boot with kernel package linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 version 2.6.16-18 Severity set to `important' from `critical' > reassign 384638 xen-3.0 Bug#384638: Dom0 dows not boot with kernel package linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 version 2.6.16-18 Bug reassigned from package
2006 Feb 13
1
kernel.org 2.6.16-rc2 vs xen-unstable 2.6.16-rc2 - missing buslogic?
Hello, Is there some things removed from the kernel.org kernels before the get into xen-unstable? I was just about to compile a new dom0 kernel, and couldn''t find the option for Buslogic SCSI driver i xen-unstable kernel synced earlier this morning. I find this a bit strange, as I know the option is there in kernel.org''s 2.6.16-rc2. The config option was somehow lost in 2.6.15
2007 Jan 19
2
2.6.17 kernels and equalize patch
Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network
2006 Aug 04
2
IFB support in 2.6.17 kernel
Hi, I''m trying to activate IFB device support in a 2.6.17 kernel from Debian Sid. I read that IFB device is the replacement for IMQ device, but I haven''t found any useful documentantion on how to activate this feature and the kernel documentation lacks of this information. I remember that IMQ could be activated in the ''Network devices'' menu in 2.6.8 kernels,
2006 Aug 30
0
xen-linux-system-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 is broken?
Hi, I have updated my debian etch and it stop booting with xen. I see the new 2.6.17 kernel in unstable and so I have installed it but also this doesn't work (it reboots during boot). -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? - http://www.openformats.org * Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org
2006 Apr 27
0
klibc kernel tree updated to 2.6.17-rc3
The klibc kernel tree is now updated to be based on 2.6.17-rc3, with a few improvements such as printing human-friendly device names in kinit. -hpa