similar to: Bug#368496: xen-utils-3.0: Include support for HVM-based guests

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Bug#368496: xen-utils-3.0: Include support for HVM-based guests"

2011 Nov 29
6
[OCAML 0/7] V4 or so of the xen ocaml packaging patches
Here is the latest version of the patches to package the ocaml libraries. Changes since last time: * rename the packages from libxen-4.1-ocaml* to libxen-ocaml* - we wont be looking to install multiple concurrent versions of the same package, so the version doesn't need to be in the package name * Removed superfluous GENCONTROL definitions - dh_ocaml does what we need * Removed
2011 Nov 15
6
[OCAML 0/7] Xen ocaml library packaging
This is an update to the patches sent out on 25th October. I expect, as before, that some of the larger patches won't get to the list so they are also available here: https://github.com/jonludlam/pkg-xen/commits/for-debian6. Changes since last mail: * I have split out the unrelated change to include 2 extra header files in libxen-dev * I have removed some instances of brace expansion
2011 Oct 25
14
[PATCH 0/9] Package the ocaml libraries
The following set of patches package up the ocaml libraries that are part of the standard xen build. The patches are also currently available at: https://github.com/jonludlam/pkg-xen/commits/for-debian There are some things to note: 1. The 5 patches imported from xen-unstable are not, and will not go into the xen-4.1-stable series. However, the patches were created at the request of the
2011 Aug 10
1
Xen 4.1.1 packaging enhancement
Hi, This email is mainly addressed at Waldi (Bastian Blank). I'm resending it since the previous one is waiting for approval due to its size being bigger than 40k (I compressed the .diff this time, so it should be ok). I have worked on enhancing the current packaging of Xen 4.1.1 over the last weeks. The main goal was to package the OCaml libraries of Xen as separated binary packages, and
2011 Nov 25
2
[PATCH 6/7] Create 2 ocaml packages, libxen-4.1-ocaml and libxen-4.1-ocaml-dev.
V4 of the patch, incorporating Bastian's suggestions. Jon --- xen/debian/patches/series | 1 + xen/debian/patches/tools-ocaml-fix-build.diff | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/debian/rules | 5 ++ xen/debian/rules.real | 39 ++++++++++++ xen/debian/templates/control.main.in | 16 +++++
2006 May 29
2
VT built in?
Hi Xen team, one short question before I grab the new machine of a colleague: did you build Xen3 for Sid with VMX (virtualization with the newer Vander...Pacifica)? Or will I have to build it myself? Sorry for the direct mail to this list, but I'm not subscribed to Debian-Users. Please CC me, as I'm also not subsribed here. Thx. kind regards, Wolfgang -- cheers,
2007 Aug 02
3
ioemu/xenfb
Hi folks There are two components, which are currently not included in the main utils package: ioemu, xenfb. ioemu is currently shipped in its own package, xenfb is not shipped at all. Should we fold them into the main utils package for simplicity? ioemu adds 300k to the package and 4300k in one dependency (libsdl1.2debian). xenfb adds another 200k to the package and 200k in one dependency
2016 Mar 26
2
PHP bindings fail on Ubuntu for xapian-bindings-1.2.21
Hi Olly and co, On an Ubuntu 15.10, following the docs at https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/PHP%20Bindings%20Package When running debuild -e PHP_VERSIONS=5 -us -uc I get (sorry for the French): " dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: paquet source xapian-bindings dpkg-buildpackage: version source 1.2.21-2.1 dpkg-buildpackage: distribution source unstable
2006 Oct 23
3
Bug#394931: xen-utils-3.0.3-1: Manpages not included
Package: xen-utils-3.0.3-1 Version: 3.0.3-0-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Manpages that are provided with the source are not included with the utilities. Use perl-doc package at build-time to generate appropriate manpages and dh_manpages to install them in the appropriate locations. diff -urN xen-3.0-3.0.3-0/debian/control xen-3.0-3.0.3-0.new/debian/control --- xen-3.0-3.0.3-0/debian/control
2020 Oct 07
2
[PATCH] add with-openssl option
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:59 PM Marvin Scholz <epirat07 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, CC'd the mailing list. > > It seems you are not up to date, git master already has a > --without-openssl option. Without this patch, I get /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link mips-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -Wall -ffast-math -fsigned-char
2004 Aug 31
5
OT: Headset for Cisco 7960?
Sorry, I know it's OT, but does anyone know of a relatively inexpensive headset that is compatible with the Cisco 7960? I've tried the headset off Norstar phones, doesn't seem to work with or without the amp. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com | | depriving some poor
2006 May 25
3
HVM - BIOS serial console redirection?
I realized this is probably better suited for the devel list.. basically, is there any way in the BOCHS bios to enable ''Serial Console Redirection'', where you see the BIOS contents over the serial line? Windows 2003''s ''Emergency Management Services'' console (which allows you to do installs and fix stuff over the serial line) requires this to
2015 Jan 22
5
Ubuntu delta against 4.5.0-1 in experimental for disussion
Hi, I just finished preparing the Xen-4.5 merge from experimental into our next release (Vivid/15.04). And something I actually should have done since the 4.4 times is to report back the delta I have in case there are things Debian might want to pick up as well. So below is the commented debdiff between the 4.5.0-1 in experimental and the Ubuntu version I prepared so far (only compile tested on
2020 Oct 07
1
[PATCH] add with-openssl option
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:43 AM Marvin Scholz <epirat07 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, please provide the contents of the config.log > > I can not reproduce your issue on my machine, --without-openssl > works fine here. > > Oh and next time please mention that its about libshout right > away :) https://gist.github.com/neheb/a26714035978d07a822985477524cd45 > > On 7
2013 Jun 29
2
Syslinux 6.00 released
Hi, seems like there is a problem in gnu-efi Makefiles: When you are not on Debian, this will be installed (from $source/inc/Makefile, called from $source/Makefile): install: mkdir -p $(INSTALLROOT)$(PREFIX)/include/efi mkdir -p $(INSTALLROOT)$(PREFIX)/include/efi/protocol mkdir -p $(INSTALLROOT)$(PREFIX)/include/efi/$(ARCH) $(INSTALL) -m 644 *.h
2006 May 22
3
Include HVM support?
Could the packages be updated to include the HVM support files? I believe the necessary files are: ./usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm ./usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm.debug ./usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader These do add dependencies on x11, so it may be a good idea to split it into a separate package.. but it is needed for VT-based processors.
2014 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] cmake and make check?
On 02/13/2014 11:35 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Reed, > >> but then many tests fail when i do a "make check" > > That's not normal (all tests pass for me on Linux and OS X). Is this > on your build machine, or a MIPS board with some odd > cross-compilation? The latter is more likely to have weird CMake > issues (I know AArch64 does if you're not
2004 Aug 10
3
Semi-OT: Splitting a PRI into two PRI's?
Hey all, I've got a PRI used for data calls right now, terminated in a MAX 4000. We're only using around 12 channels on average and 16 max, so I'd like to split off the remaining channels to terminate in an Asterisk box. Does anyone know of a device that'll take a PRI in, and spit out two PRI's that share the channels? Also need to be able to do some sort of call routing so
2004 Jul 12
1
Sort of OT: Recommended USB handset for use with iaxComm?
One of my coworkers needs to get a softphone set up to my Asterisk system; he's a Linux user, so it looks like about the only IAX2 option is iaxComm. For ease of use (he'll be using this a fair bit), I'm recommending that he get a USB handset; I'm just having trouble finding any US retailers for them. :) Could someone recommend a USB handset that's compatible with iaxComm
2006 May 04
1
Bug#366019: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae: "pae enabled version" how is it any different ?
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae Severity: wishlist The description of the package should give hints as to why it is different from xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386. Mike -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: