similar to: Are we there yet?

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, Please consider removing xen. New xen-3.0 splited packages are upcoming, making this one obsolete. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <julien@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // The more we fly, the more we climb, the more we know that heaven is a lie. -------------- next part

xcb-util 0.3.2 is available git tag 0.3.2 Changelog ========= Jonathan Landis (1): Fix copyright statement Julien Danjou (4): build: add check for xproto >= 7.0.8 keysyms: use xcb_key_lookup_t type for col paramter icccm: fix gravity proto Release xcb-util 0.3.2 Peter Harris (2): Don't call exit() in xcb_aux_get_depth; return 0 instead. Fix the

xcb-util 0.3.1 is now available git tag 0.3.1 Changelog ========= Henning Sten (2): introduce function xcb_atom_get (essentially a synchronous xcb_intern_atom, use it only on non-performance critical execution paths) add more verbose explanation of the purpose of "encoding" parameter in doxygen documentation tag Julien Danjou (5): icccm: add some comment on text

libxcb 1.2 is now available, lucky you. git tag 1.2 Changelog ========= Julien Danjou (2): Stop providing autogenerated files in tarball Release libxcb 1.2 Download ======== http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/libxcb-1.2.tar.gz md5: f55c731d32ec1a555c77ebbbc8f386aa sha1: 9c1c256b9bcfe78cb99a15b567ca00ffb9a45c1e http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/libxcb-1.2.tar.bz2 md5:

Hi, I'd like to know if the following is normal. I've a setup with 2 namespace (private/public) where each user can use subscriptions. This problem is triggered by claws-mail, which uses LSUB to get subscribed mailboxes: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready. . login user password . namespace * NAMESPACE (("INBOX."

Hello, I have set up a build machine for Xen. Currently it builds the version checked out from Subversion with the latest testing version from Xen repository for Sarge every night. deb http://naquadah.org/~jd/debian/xen stable main I plan to upload real and official backports to backports.org as soon as we will upload a version to sid. Any comment welcome, Cheers, -- Julien Danjou

Hello, I asked Aurelien Jarno from the Debian glibc team about our /lib/tls problem. It gave me a little help: # ldd /bin/echo libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x40021000) # touch /etc/ld.so.hwnocap # ldd /bin/echo libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40021000) I think this could help us. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' :

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: Hello, > Do you mean svn or some other new revision control system, right? Yes, please, use subversion, not CVS anymore :) Reading http://svn.debian.org/, we should ask for a repository. I think the project admin should do this ;) > Anyway, yeah, I think the debian directory should be fine! We can still use > dpatch if we

Hello, I would like to make a point on the current status of the Xen 3.0 package. It seems the current issue that Bastian told are now fixed. So, I would like to heard some report from users about the usability of this package, in order to upload it as soon as possible. If your discover any bug, any strange behaviour or any missing things, please do report it here. -- Julien Danjou

reassign 381481 aptitude thanks > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:54:43AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > | ...................... > > > | rval == -1080447064 > > > | > > > | now2.tv_sec == 1155053066 > > > | now.tv_sec + 2 == 1155053066 > > > | now2.tv_usec == 882203 > > > | now.tv_usec == 887661 > > >

Hello, The current dependancy on hotplug|udev (>= 0.59) seems bad. As far as I remember, last week, when I tried to install Ralph packages, I got an error from hotplug/udev and I had to use udev from backports.org Anyone know which version of udev/hotplug we will have to depends on ? Maybe we could simply rely on a recent udev dependancy, because afaik udev now provides hotplug. -- Julien

Hello, We [the Debian Xen package team] are currently working on Xen packages, and are planning to include them into Debian. A current issue in Xen, is the libc problem. From the Xen wiki [1]: "Xen uses segmentation to provide protection of the memory used for the hypervisor. This results in some performance issues since wrap-around segments as used by glibc need expensive extra handling.

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1 Severity: important Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9697-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 20060725-0410 > ****************************************************************************** ... > CFLAGS="-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -m32 -march=i686 -Wall

Hi, First, thanks for this awesome piece of software. I've just upgraded to latest dovecot, aka 1.2. I've a problem. I've started using Sieve, and everything works fine, I already received a thousand of mails without any problem. However, there's one mail which is stuck in the postfix queue because of that: Jul 8 18:47:51 prometheus dovecot: deliver(jd at danjou.info):

Author: ultrotter Date: 2006-02-17 06:56:29 +0000 (Fri, 17 Feb 2006) New Revision: 9 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/control Log: Change the version and debian revision, as agreed on the ML Start tracking the bugs that need to be closed on upload Modified: trunk/debian/changelog =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/changelog

Greetings Debian Xen team, I spent a weekend getting 3.0.2-testing building and thought i'd share the love. Manoj and I are already working to update make-kpkg for the new Xen architecture. My repo is at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/ I have posted a Breezy-centric howto for this build at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/README.txt Hope you enjoy it, and hope we can

# xm create -c vm01.cfg Error: Cannot open config file "vm01.cfg" www:/var/log/xen# xm create -c /etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg". Error: (22, 'Invalid argument') # xm log [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO (__init__:1072) Resource label file not found. [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO

Package: xen-utils-3.0.3-1 Version: 3.0.3-0-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Manpages that are provided with the source are not included with the utilities. Use perl-doc package at build-time to generate appropriate manpages and dh_manpages to install them in the appropriate locations. diff -urN xen-3.0-3.0.3-0/debian/control xen-3.0-3.0.3-0.new/debian/control --- xen-3.0-3.0.3-0/debian/control

Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido

Hi! This might be fixed by upstream changeset 9669, even though I'm not completely sure... I will test and report back! Guido