similar to: Bug#443908: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind: [bind] unexpected RCODE (NOTIMP)

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: normal After double checking that I had the most up to date logcheck-database :-) I am seeing these lines reported. May 17 15:29:33 localhost named[1765]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'software.majix.org/A/IN': 2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53 I believe that this line was intended to match it. ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11}

The primary (a BIND9) of a zone ("test.") served (as a secondary) by our nsd complains: Jul 16 17:52:45.796 notify: debug 3: zone test/IN: notify response from 192.134.7.251#53: NOTIMP After all, nsd implements the NOTIFY, it logs them and SEC parses the log file to run "nsdc update". Isn't it an error to send a NOTIMP? nsd 1.2.1

Hi! I've got troubles with dynamic dns updates. Ubuntu: 12.04 / Samba 4.0.0 / followed off. howto Winsrv: Server 2k8R2 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# samba -V Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-94f11e9 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# kinit administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL Password for administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL: root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator

Hello all, This is with Samba 4.0.0rc6 with the built-in DNS server. Found the problem in Samba 4.0.0rc5 originally, then updated to see if bug had been fixed between rc5 and rc6. I am trying to get mail working for a subdomain that is being managed by Samba 4. I added an MX record, but the problem here is that the Samba 4 DNS server isn't replying with the record:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.54 Severity: wishlist In addition to seeing warnings from bind about REFUSED and SERVFAIL unexpected RCODE, I'm also getting from "15" in my logs as well, from various unrelated hosts. This doesn't occur nearly as frequently as the other two, but still enough to be annoying. May I suggest inserting "(REFUSED|SERVFAIL|15)" in

How do I tell LogCheck that I don't care what's in the rest of the search string? ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} m0n0wall ipmon\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9:]{8}\.[0-9]{6} xl0 (@ 0:3|@100:3) (b|p) 192\.168\.2\.[0-9]{1,3} -> [0-9.]{7,15} PR igmp len [0-9]{2} \([0-9]{2}+\) IN$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} m0n0wall ipmon\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9:]{8}\.[0-9]{6} xl0 (@ 0:3|@100:3) (b|p) 192\.168\.2\.[0-9]{1,3} -> [0-9.]{7,15} PR

I ran into the same problem after somebody uninstalled logcheck and I re-installed it. It turned out that the ownership of /var/lock/logcheck where root:root - sudo chown logcheck:logcheck /var/lock/logcheck solved it. I see that there already is a check for the permissions in the postinst which (as far as I can see) *should* have fixed the permissions and ownership there. When re-installing

Hai, ? I just installed a clean sernet samba 4.2.1 with just 2 dc's, used my scripts, all went ok, but when i check the logs. Im see-ing the following..?? ( with every start of restart ) ? [2015/04/22 13:50:40.622537,? 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:370(binary_smbd_main) ? samba version 4.2.1-SerNet-Debian-7.wheezy started. ? Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2014 [2015/04/22

Hello, I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. Both systems are set

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 12:23 PM, Joe wrote: > Is there any way at all to say which is the original file and which is > the hard link? I'll bet there isn't, although I' m not an internals guy > at all. If so, this would be impossible to do. The inode is the > "original", but all the file table entries to it are hard links (if > they're not symlinks.) >

Hi Everyone, The following request was received from a Debian user; could you comment on it? I think this seems reasonable, although the cron output can be fixed by writing to a temporary file and using grep -v. (The temporary file is necessary to avoid discarding the exit code, although that may not be needed in the case of rsync, since it writes that to stderr). On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at

1) samba-tool dns add dcmsc.test.inc test.inc test.inc MX 'mail.test.inc 10' 2) samba-tool dns query dcmsc.test.inc test.inc test.inc MX 3) [root at dcmsc caiman]# samba-tool dns query dcmsc.test.inc test.inc test.inc MX Password for [administrator at test.INC]: Name=, Records=1, Children=0 MX: mail.test.inc. (5) (flags=600000f0, serial=10, ttl=0) Name=_msdcs, Records=0,

Hello there. So, I have a Samba AD setup, with DHCP and samba_dlz setup as described in the wiki. However, I find that after a while, dynamic DHCPD updates stop working. The fix is for me to restart the named server. When in this state, I get log messages like: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.52.232 (192.168.60.2) from 8c:be:be:0d:cf:3c (RedmiNote4-Gj?gur) via 192.168.52.253 Dec 18 15:39:44 dc02

On 18.07.2016 20:10, Rowland penny wrote: > On 18/07/16 00:02, Norbert Hanke wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>

Hello Rowland, thanks for your help. My replies lines below: > Do the DCs point at each other for dns ? > > i.e. is /etc/resolv.conf on the first DC something like this: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.second.dc > nameserver ip.of.this.dc > > and on the second DC: > > search your.domian.com > nameserver ip.of.first.dc > nameserver

Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH

On 18 December 2017 at 16:20, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > > > Even this looks wrong, I would expect something like this: > > Dec 18 07:43:59 dc3 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.111 from > cc:4e:ec:e9:c8:d3 via eth0 > Dec 18 07:43:59 dc3 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.111 to cc:4e:ec:e9:c8:d3 > via eth0 > Dec 18 07:47:33 dc3 dhcpd:

On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update

On 18.07.2016 22:48, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >>>> both with

On 1/2/2018 1:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> A few other observations while attempting to switch. >> >> * I do not have a dns.keytab file. Should I or is created after >> attempting to switch? > See my earlier post about samba_dnsupgrade. >