Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Bug#443869: logcheck-database: [bind] notify question section contains no SOA"
2007 Sep 24
3
Bug#443886: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/proftpd: [proftpd] Refused user $USER for service $FOO
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.61
Severity: wishlist
File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/proftpd
Two weeks ago, I got a rush of these:
Sep 8 12:37:07 goretex proftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user news for service proftpd
(Apparently, fail2ban managed to miss those.)
This is triggered by pam_listfile, which is used by proftpd (and other
FTP daemons) to block users listed in
2005 Jun 07
2
Bug#312376: /etc/logcheck/logcheck.ignore is no longer read
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.39
Severity: normal
Since I've upgraded my servers to sarge, I'm getting mail every hour for
stuff that was duly included in /etc/logcheck/logcheck.ignore. Turns
out that sarge's version no longer reads that file.
If this was a conscious decision, then there should be some warning
about this when upgrading (via debconf of NEWS.Debian). Also, the
2007 Oct 03
2
Bug#445072: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-ssh: Failed password for ...
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.62
Severity: normal
File: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-ssh
Somewhere between etch and now, ssh stopped reporting failed passwords
as "error: PAM: Authentication failure for foo", and switched to "Failed
password for foo", similar to what it already did for unknown users, but
without the "invalid user" part.
2008 Mar 15
1
Bug#471072: logcheck-database: Moving most of violations.ignore.d to ignore.d.*
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.63
Severity: normal
Given that violations.d/logcheck has been emptied by
2394562ab4a13c4510c671f01ffc8f35e97f1cd3, shouldn't most of
violations.ignore.d be moved to one of ignore.d.*? AIUI, all of these
are currently rendered useless.
(I'll gladly lend a hand; I just want to make sure this is the right
thing to do.)
-- System Information:
Debian
2007 Oct 03
1
Bug#445074: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ssh: Nasty PTR record
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.62
Severity: wishlist
File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ssh
openssh issues a friendly warning when the remote IP maps back to a
hostname that looks just like an IP address. (For example, the address
206.251.174.31 currently maps back to the hostname "206.251.174.31".)
Here's a rule that filters out these unimportant messages:
^\w{3} [
2007 Sep 26
1
Bug#444097: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ddclient: 2 rules to get you started
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.62
Severity: wishlist
Here are two rules for ddclient, a client for dynamic IP services such
as DynDNS or DynIP:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ddclient\[[[:digit:]]+\]: SUCCESS: updating [._[:alnum:]-]+: good: IP address set to [:[:xdigit:].]+$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ddclient\[[[:digit:]]+\]: WARNING: forcing update of [._[:alnum:]-]+ from
2007 Sep 24
1
Bug#443908: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind: [bind] unexpected RCODE (NOTIMP)
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.61
Severity: wishlist
File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/bind
After #437891, I got yet another new "unexpected RCODE", this time
"NOTIMP". As I was starting to get pissed off, I copied the whole list
out of lib/dns/result.c, in an attempt to put an end to my headache.
If you insist on using an enumeration instead of ".*",
2007 Aug 14
0
Bug#437753: logcheck-database: proftpd ignore rule does not match when rhost is IPv6
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.54
Severity: normal
It would appear that proftpd is now logging IP addresses in IPv6 form,
even the v4 ones. I got a bunch of these last week:
Aug 7 04:00:11 goretex proftpd: (pam_unix) authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=::ffff:58.60.237.66 user=mysql
Simply adding a ":" to the rhost character class did the
2007 Aug 14
0
Bug#437891: logcheck-database: addition to ignore rule for bind's RCODE
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.54
Severity: wishlist
In addition to seeing warnings from bind about REFUSED and SERVFAIL
unexpected RCODE, I'm also getting from "15" in my logs as well, from
various unrelated hosts. This doesn't occur nearly as frequently as the
other two, but still enough to be annoying.
May I suggest inserting "(REFUSED|SERVFAIL|15)" in
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.33
Severity: normal
I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid...
- Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of
2005 Jan 14
3
Bug#290511: logcheck: syslogd restart in cron.daily/sysklogd causes a log message
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: wishlist
/etc/cron.daily/sysklogd restarts syslogd at the end of the script.
This causes a daily log message, currently missed by logcheck:
Jan 14 06:55:22 pyloric syslogd 1.4.1#16: restart (remote reception).
I'm currently using this regex in ignore.server.d/local-syslogd:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ syslogd 1\.4\.1#16: restart \(remote
2009 Aug 18
2
Bug#542265: sendmail-base and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together
Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base
Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69
Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9
Severity: serious
User: treinen at debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-08-18
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the
2008 Jan 24
0
[PATCH] Re-enabled :port portion of "UDPv4 link" openvpn rule
I see that this openvpn rule has been modified to no longer attach the
":port" part to "[undef]" -- probably to reflect a recent change in
openvpn. Unfortunately, the rule no longer matches in etch, thus
breaking the backport.
Here's a patch to match both versions.
Signed-off-by: Fr?d?ric Bri?re <fbriere at fbriere.net>
---
rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
2008 Jan 24
0
[PATCH] Added "Re-using pre-shared static key" openvpn rule
Signed-off-by: Fr?d?ric Bri?re <fbriere at fbriere.net>
---
rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
index 68ebf8f..c57e3cb 100644
--- a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
+++ b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
@@ -13,7 +13,7
2009 Dec 21
2
Bug#561995: mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lock/logcheck': Permission denied
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.4
Severity: normal
I am running debian/testing and just upgraded to logcheck 1.3.4 and it
started reporting the error:
mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lock/logcheck': Permission denied
I created the directory and chown'd it to logcheck and it seems fine now.
Looking at the changelog, I see something was purposefully changed, so I
imagine I
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was
looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to
the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part
of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
2005 Apr 07
1
Bug#303661: logcheck-database: openntpd rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.37
Severity: normal
Hello again,
openntpd gives messages like these failry often:
Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid
Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid
I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info
for me.
2004 Sep 04
1
Bug#269959: logcheck-database: courier ignore.d.server contains word from violations.d list
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.26
Severity: normal
Hi,
the file courier contains the line:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pop3d-ssl: Unexpected SSL connection
shutdown\.$
This triggers the security logcheck section because of the word
"shutdown". Quick fix is to move or duplicate this line to
violations.ignore.d/logcheck-courier.
BTW: It looks like the courier package
2007 Aug 16
0
Customizing locale settings in CentOS-4.5
I am trying to determine how to customize the date and time display of
system utilities and user programs using the locale settings. What I
really want is some sort of utility program that does the same thing for
CentOS as the Regions Settings Control Panel app. for MicroSoft Windows
accomplishes, but I have no hope of seeing that.
I have traced the login locale processing through /etc/profile
2019 Jan 14
0
Setting 'unix charset' kills the samba share
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:27:04 -0500
Gilbert Soucy <gsoucy at 36pix.com> wrote:
> Yes, I have tried testparam. All is OK . Note that I can write
> anything for unix charset and testparm does not complain.
>
> Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
> rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit
> (16384) Processing section