similar to: Bug#425035: hylafax-server: missing logcheck rule

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: wishlist Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile? This is the standard dnsmasq output. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: wishlist HI, can you please create a rule/some rules for amavis(d-new). I get for every mail this mesage: May 25 19:55:40 data amavis[9603]: (09603-15) Passed CLEAN, [::1] [213.165.64.22] <xxx at yyy.zz> -> \ <aaa at localhost>, Message-ID: <20100525175015.29677page1 at mx002.bbb.ccc>, mail_id: MM7upJv6se1Z, \ Hits:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.43a Severity: minor Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to 1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of the form Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286 Could you please edit the second pattern in

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: wishlist Hi folks, thanks for your work maintaining logcheck, it works well. When my users read their mail using imap (usually via squirrelmail, not sure about other clients) I get a message like this in the log: Aug 22 21:03:32 phoenix imapd[6551]: Moved 11323 bytes of new mail to /home/winky/mail/mbox from /var/spool/mail/winky host= localhost

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: minor man (8) logcheck says: For hints on how to maintain rules, see README.logcheck-database.gz, but this file is not included in /usr/share/doc/logcheck. micah -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix : ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch After upgrading to debian squeeze I get several messages a day in the form of: Jul 2 15:05:15 hostname spamd[21286]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid [28609] due to SIGCHLD: exit 0 This is due to an update in spamd, that makes the message more detailed (includes exit code)[1]. Therefore messages including exit code 0

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal I added a local.rules file to ignore.d.server and then ran logcheck. The file was not used during the run. Renaming it to local-rules got the file used during the next run. Fix: periods should be allowed in filenames, or the fact that they are forbidden expressly documented inteh logcheck README. Thanks Nils -- System Information: Debian

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the patterns for pure-ftpd in ignore.d.server are not matching a user with a trailing whitespace. here a some examples: Feb 18 13:02:33 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [NOTICE] /example/example.txt downloaded (5908 bytes, 152196.03KB/sec) Feb 18 13:16:14 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [INFO] Logout. every

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.44 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, This patch changes one rule for dhcpd. It adds support for log lines of the following format: May 30 19:36:57 server dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.10.10.10 (aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff) via eth1 Regards, Robbert --- /root/dhcp 2006-05-30 21:50:24.000000000 +0200 +++ dhcp 2006-05-30 23:27:06.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.56 Followup-For: Bug #429384 I get the following message in my e-mail from cron: Cron <logcheck at entercom> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 645: mktemp: command not found /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 646: mktemp: command not found rm: too few arguments Try `rm --help' for more information.

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: wishlist Hello, when newgrp (part of the package login) is used, I see messages like this in my syslog: Aug 27 23:36:16 debian64 newgrp[1975]: user `root' (login `root' on tty1) switched to group `backup' Aug 27 19:28:15 srv1 newgrp[10082]: user `root' (login `mazur' on pts/1) switched to group `backup' Aug 27

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.56 Severity: important logcheck requires mktemp to operate (it will abort with a fine, descriptive error message and email), but doesn't actually depend on it. -- grok. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (998, 'testing'), (501, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, I think that this rule: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ su\[[0-9]+\]: (\+|-) (pts/[0-9]{1,2}|tty[0-9]) [_[:alnum:]-]+:[_[:alnum:]-]+$ is supposed to filter out lines like: Oct 17 14:49:24 myhost su[13469]: + /dev/pts/1 user1:root It is not working because the pattern dos not include the "/dev/" part and

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: wishlist Hi, Can you add rule to filter out following messages: System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-= May 15 07:44:48 niko syslog-ng[21911]: Configuration reload request received, reloading configuration; Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'),

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.35 Severity: normal I'm getting the following on two different Unstable boxen: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subject: Cron <logcheck at bandit-hall> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal The rule for SSH ignoring "Bad protocol version identification" assumes there are no single quotes inside the version string ('[^']'). I am however getting mails including those lines: Mar 25 22:57:04 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[12144]: Bad protocol version identification

Hi, I thought I'd check in with people here. Lets say I wanted to put together a Hylafax server, and an Asterisk server on the same box. And, for the sake of making things simple, I wanted to use a single T1 board for both.... Is this possible? I see Eicon boards are supported by both software, so could I have Hylafax and Asterisk installed on a server with an Eicon card, with channels

Can anybody point me in the right direction please? I'm having some issues getting iaxmodem and hylafax to talk to each other. I have no doubt that someone has had this type of issue before but I can't find anything useful in the archives or on Google. Under RH9, with chan_capi 7.1, Asterisk 1.2.24, with an AVI Fritz ISDN2e BRI card all working perfectly... I've downloaded and

O, try the following.   Test this first. ldd /usr/sbin/hfaxd  if you getting libpam.so..  something, then hylafax is compiled with pam support.   Next,   apt-get install libpam-ldap   ( just to be sure, i do believe you have installed it already )   create the file :  /etc/pam.d/hylafax Add :   auth         required       pam_ldap.so account   required       pam_ldap.so