similar to: Bug#398163: Sorry, my regexp was wrong a bit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Bug#398163: Sorry, my regexp was wrong a bit"

2006 May 17
2
Bug#367781: logcheck-database: postfix/smtp read timeout (port 25) regexp wrong
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: normal The rule for postfix/smtp read timeout (port 25) doesn't match the actual log message: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: connect to [^[:space:]]+ \[[.0-9]+\]: read timeout \(port 25\)$ A sample log line is: May 17 17:38:16 dp postfix/smtp[12256]: connect to smtpv1.ihs.gov[198.45.3.65]: read timeout (port
2010 Feb 07
2
Bug#568815: Redundant messages from dhcpd in logcheck output in "server" mode.
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal Tags: patch Logcheck's reports contains many messages like: Feb 7 19:03:57 srv dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 172.21.0.126 from 00:19:7e:9f:cc:32 (Hostname Unsuitable for Printing) via eth0 Feb 7 19:03:57 srv dhcpd: DHCPACK on 172.21.0.126 to 00:19:7e:9f:cc:32 (Hostname Unsuitable for Printing) via eth0 I create file
2006 Apr 18
0
Bug#363336: logcheck-database: incomplete regexp for popa3d log message
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.43a Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Given the following popa3d log messages: popa3d[15636]: 0 messages (0 bytes) loaded popa3d[15993]: 1 message (3837 bytes) loaded popa3d[15856]: 3 messages (18116 bytes) loaded The current logcheck ruleset does not take into account that sometimes there might be multiple message_S_ to be loaded. The following patch
2006 Jan 07
2
Bug#346350: logcheck-database: dhcp3-server ignores need to include (none ) client host name
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: normal I use dhcp3-server and a dhcp client which is Sony HDD video recorder CoCoon. The client not return client host name. In this case, dhcpd server assumed the client host name is (none). Therefor dhcpd output log described below. > Jan 7 10:49:24 on-o dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:46:33:55:77 ((none)) via eth0 > Jan 7 10:49:25
2006 May 21
2
Bug#368313: logcheck-database: new postfix violations ignore rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix : ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:
2004 May 21
2
Bug#247360: logcheck: Where's NEWS.Debian?
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #247360 I can't find NEWS.Debian in the package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser
2005 Jul 11
3
Bug#317741: logcheck-database: fails to ignore properly some lines from 'rbldnsd'
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.40 Severity: normal Tags: patch There are one line that is not properly ignored. I include in the report a better version. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale:
2006 Nov 26
0
Bug#400432: logcheck-database: slapcat Initializing BDB
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.51 Severity: wishlist I'm backup my ldap with slapcat (from package slapd) and get a entry in syslog. Can you add to /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/slpad: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapcat: bdb_db_init: Initializing BDB database$ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers experimental APT policy: (1, 'experimental')
2006 May 30
2
Bug#369603: logcheck-database: new rule for dhcpd
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.44 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, This patch changes one rule for dhcpd. It adds support for log lines of the following format: May 30 19:36:57 server dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.10.10.10 (aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff) via eth1 Regards, Robbert --- /root/dhcp 2006-05-30 21:50:24.000000000 +0200 +++ dhcp 2006-05-30 23:27:06.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
2007 May 25
0
Bug#425967: logcheck-database: The patterns for courier-imap-ssl do not match imap, only imap-ssl
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.54 Severity: minor -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.2-dp0 Locale: LANG=de_DE at euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE at euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages logcheck-database depends
2007 Oct 29
1
Bug#448510: logcheck-database: revised pattern for spamd
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: normal Tags: patch spamassassin is now reporting Unix domain sockets in the rport field. I'm not exactly sure what changed to cause this to happen; it started after an upgrade whose only remotely relevant package was razor. I think the following pattern in ignore.d.server/spamd will work ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2006 Aug 11
0
Bug#382440: logcheck-database: Postfix rule missing in violations.ignore.d
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.47 Severity: normal Tags: patch Without the following logcheck line in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d, lines such as the following are reported: postfix/smtp[30054]: 824E9A2C1E: to=<nooneisillegal at someplace.net>, relay=0.0.0.0[0.0.0.0], delay=1, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=30274-22, from MTA: 250 Ok: queued as 15140A2D0A) This is because
2008 Sep 24
2
Bug#500017: ignore.d.server/ssh: outdated 'reverse mapping checking ... failed' rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.68 Severity: minor openssh-server version 1:5.1p1-2 ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sshd\[[0-9]+\]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for [._[:alnum:]-]+ failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-?IN ATTEMPT!$ should look like ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sshd\[[0-9]+\]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for [._[:alnum:]-]+ \[[.[:alnum:]:]+\] failed -
2009 Jan 02
1
Bug#510472: logcheck-database: pam_unix messages could be ignored.
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.68 Severity: normal I'm using ldap to authenticate users. And thus pam_unix is sufficient, but allowed to fail. It has now started to spam the logs with lots of Jan 2 09:22:57 sisko sshd[28511]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=host92-22-static.38-79-b.business.telecomitalia.it user=root And on
2008 May 15
3
Bug#481306: logcheck-database: Request for new rule: "syslog-ng : Configuration reload"
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: wishlist Hi, Can you add rule to filter out following messages: System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-= May 15 07:44:48 niko syslog-ng[21911]: Configuration reload request received, reloading configuration; Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'),
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal Tags: patch The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM. -- System Information: Debian Release:
2004 Jul 11
2
Bug#254681: logcheck-database: su from cron job not necessarily to "nobody"
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.23 Followup-For: Bug #254681 Please generalize "nobody" to "[_[:alnum:]-]+", as some cron jobs su to other users: Jul 11 06:51:16 tux su[10385]: + ??? root:hinfo Jul 11 06:57:25 tux su[29801]: + ??? root:www-data Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,
2004 Oct 21
3
Bug#277636: logcheck-database: support for dnsmasq
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: wishlist Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile? This is the standard dnsmasq output. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2006 Dec 24
0
Bug#404422: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp messages not ignored by ignore.d.server/postfix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.51 Severity: normal Messages such as these are no longer being filtered by logcheck ('hostname' used to replace actual hostname; 'hostname.com' used to replace actual domain): Dec 23 12:02:58 hostname postfix/lmtp[5047]: 38BE4C21ED: to=<root at hostname.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=4.1, delays=2/0.16/0.05/1.8,
2007 Mar 04
0
Bug#413364: logcheck ignores cron rules for "session closed" and "session opened"
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.54 Severity: normal In the file ignore.d.paranoid/cron there are the rules ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ CRON\[[0-9]+\]: \(pam_[[:alnum:]]+\) session opened for user [[:alnum:]-]+ by \(uid=[0-9]+\)$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ CRON\[[0-9]+\]: \(pam_[[:alnum:]]+\) session closed for user [[:alnum:]-]+$ to ignore lines like 10:17:01 at 04-03-2007 tooar