similar to: Bug#330220: same problem (solution ?)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Bug#330220: same problem (solution ?)"

2007 Feb 28
0
Bug#330220: Permissions of /var/lock/logcheck not conducive to logcheck user writing to it
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.54 Followup-For: Bug #330220 root at ns2:/# ls -l /var/lock/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-01-30 15:40 logcheck I think chmod 775 on that file would fix this problem... -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked
2016 Jul 17
2
doveadm feature request: move mailbox between users
aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote on 17/07/2016 12:37: >> A feature request for doveadm: move (or copy) mailboxes between users >> >> Something like: >> >> doveadm movemailbox -s User1 -d User2 Old/Mail/Box Destin/Ation/Path > You can do this with > - mailbox create > - move > - delete See thread "Moving Maildir folders" The problem is to
2006 Mar 06
3
Two asterisks on one machine
Hello friends, Can I run two asterisks running simultaneously on the same machine? I want one to run v1.0.2 for h323 ( which is an old and running production system ) and one for sip implementation. I wonder how it can be done since they will want access to the same ports and ip addresses. Does anyone know to do this or has done this before? Please share your experiences please.
2010 Nov 05
0
Bug#602494: logcheck runs filters for packages not installed
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Hi, at present my logcheck is into 33 minutes of cpu time for running the ignore/innd rule, when the innd package is not installed. If running logcheck against only locally created logfiles, there should be a configuration option to only run logcheck against installed (or non-purged) packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid
2007 Aug 25
0
Bug#412201: [PATCH] Squashed commit of the following:
commit 81496d0cf7b161bf981d51f0b96f860d68f3f6e3 Author: Micah Anderson <micah at debian.org> Date: Fri Aug 24 17:51:31 2007 -0400 Enable alternate temporary directory to be set in the configuration file On servers where the logfiles are very large and grow quickly, the logcheck processes may run into space issues in /tmp resulting in the email such as the following to be
2012 Jan 27
1
Bug#657641: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667) - No such process
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal Tags: patch I keep getting these messages logged, when under high load. This patch should clean that up. commit 72661acccafa519fcb48a6a756e5c35d96e7511d Author: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com> Date: Fri Jan 27 16:08:33 2012 +0100 Workaround for error: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667)
2008 May 26
0
problem to run logcheck
Hello I try to execute logcheck from a php page. So I have create a php page with a button which allow to run logcheck like this : /usr/sbin/logcheck -o > /var/log/logcheck (I want to put the result in a file logcheck, that's why I use the option -o) I have put www-data in the groupe adm : "adduser www-data adm" And after if I run logcheck like this for exemple:
2005 May 20
0
logcheck error, logtail output
Hello, I'm having this error: Warning: If you are seeing this message, your log files may not have been checked! Details: Could not run logtail or save output Check temporary directory: /tmp/logcheck.EIX3jp declare -x HOME="/var/lib/logcheck" declare -x LANG="en_US" declare -x LANGUAGE="en_US:en_GB:en" declare -x LOGNAME="logcheck" declare -x
2011 Mar 07
0
Bug#617232: logcheck: ignore regexes match ipv4 addresses only, causing false positives with ipv6 addresses.
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Various files under ignore.d.* use "[0-9.]{7,15}" to match an IPv4 address, e.g., a connection to rsyncd. However, this does not match IPv6 addresses, causing spurious reports. A better regexp might be something like: ([0-9.]{7,15}|[0-9a-f:]{2,39}) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990,
2007 Jun 26
0
Bug#429384: logcheck: Logcheck depends on mktemp
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.56 Followup-For: Bug #429384 I get the following message in my e-mail from cron: Cron <logcheck at entercom> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 645: mktemp: command not found /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 646: mktemp: command not found rm: too few arguments Try `rm --help' for more information.
2006 Jan 09
0
Re: Logcheck-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
The entry is probably not igored because of the word deny in your path . You might better set your rule in violation.ignore.d/ directory. At 13:00 09/01/2006, you wrote: >Send Logcheck-users mailing list submissions to > logcheck-users@lists.alioth.debian.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >
2008 Jul 21
1
merging violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/*
Hi guys, now that violations.d/logcheck is empty, violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* are useless and many messages that were previously elevated and filtered there now turn up as system events. Thus, I went ahead and merged violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/* in the viol-merge branch. http://git.debian.org/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/viol-merge Unless I hear
2005 Mar 16
1
Bug#299810: logcheck: grep errors after latest update
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.35 Severity: normal I'm getting the following on two different Unstable boxen: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subject: Cron <logcheck at bandit-hall> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
2006 May 21
2
Bug#368313: logcheck-database: new postfix violations ignore rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix : ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:
2012 Mar 02
1
Bug#661912: logcheck: files with period in ignore rule dirs ignored
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal I added a local.rules file to ignore.d.server and then ran logcheck. The file was not used during the run. Renaming it to local-rules got the file used during the next run. Fix: periods should be allowed in filenames, or the fact that they are forbidden expressly documented inteh logcheck README. Thanks Nils -- System Information: Debian
2006 Oct 06
0
Bug#391458: logcheck: Please provide a way to configure niceness of log scanning process
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.47 Severity: wishlist I'm running logcheck with an extended set of regular expressions on a desktop system. The CPU load of this system is normally very low, around 3%-5%. When logcheck starts scanning the logs, the CPU usage increases to 100% for several minutes and working on the system becomes difficult. I would therefore be very happy about if a
2008 Dec 29
1
cannot run logcheck
Hello, list! I can't run logcheck. This is the first time my system has not let me run something, any way I try. I am member of sudo group. I run this sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t and get Sorry, user [user] is not allowed to execute '/usr/sbin/logcheck -o -t' as logcheck on [machine]. If I try su -s /bin/bash -c "/usr/sbin/logcheck -o -t" logcheck I get
2007 Sep 14
2
Bug#442244: logcheck-database: should include the filters from cyrus-imapd-2.2
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.54 Severity: normal The included filters for cyrus (/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/cyrus) are very minimal. The cyrus-imapd-2.2 has a more extensive ruleset (there's a /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/cyrus2_2 file in that package). Please copy over the filters from cyrus-imapd-2.2. I'm running logcheck on a loghost, which doesn't run cyrus
2004 Jun 13
2
Bug#149567: logcheck: wish it could split reports to multiple people
hello russel, On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, russell at coker.com.au wrote: .. > I would like to be able to have different parts of the report sent to > different people. For example if I install a new daemon on a server > I want the messages for that daemon going only to me (not the entire > admin team) until I get it working properly. Otherwise excessive > spurious messages lead
2008 Jan 30
0
Shell Expansion in logcheck.logfiles
I'm running logcheck on a machine hosting a bunch of virtual machines using vserver, so I'd like to expand shell wildcards in the "logcheck.logfiles" file. So instead of entering /var/lib/vservers/v1/var/log/syslog /var/lib/vservers/v2/var/log/syslog /var/lib/vservers/v2/var/log/syslog I can enter /var/lib/vservers/*/var/log/syslog which gets expanded to the same thing as