Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Re: postfix logcheck"
2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS
problem shortly after it was sent.
----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org>
To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org>
Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other
2006 Feb 12
1
Bug#338732: logcheck-database: ignore rule for package cvs
tags 338732 pending
thanks
On 12 Nov 2005, at 11:38, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
> here is a rule for the cvs package. The line that should be ignored
> looks like this:
>
> Nov 12 12:02:22 djinn01 cvs-pserver[15917]: connect from
> 212.202.200.77 (212.202.200.77)
> Nov 12 12:31:00 djinn01 cvs-pserver[18386]: connect from
> 80.190.250.190 (80.190.250.190)
>
> I'll
2008 Jul 21
1
merging violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/*
Hi guys, now that violations.d/logcheck is empty,
violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* are useless and many messages that
were previously elevated and filtered there now turn up as system
events. Thus, I went ahead and merged violations.ignore.d/logcheck-*
into ignore.d.*/* in the viol-merge branch.
http://git.debian.org/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/viol-merge
Unless I hear
2005 May 15
1
Bug#191637: New rules for qpopper
package logcheck-database
tags 125794 pending
tags 191637 pending
thanks
I've been running the latest version of qpopper from unstable for a few
days and I've added the following rules to CVS:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]: connect from
[._[:alnum:]-]+$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]:
\(v[.[:digit:]]+\) POP login by user
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database
version: 1.2.23
severity: wishlist
The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp..
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]:
to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\],
delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$
..doesn't catch these messages:
Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2006 Jul 08
2
building the logcheck package from SVN
apt-get install svn-buildpackage
cat <<_eof >> ~/.svn-buildpackage.conf
svn-lintian
svn-linda
svn-move
_eof
mkdir logcheck; cd logcheck
svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/logcheck/logcheck/trunk
cd trunk
svn-buildpackage -k<your key ID> -rfakeroot
man svn-buildpackage for more. Nice, huh?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :' :
2005 Apr 28
1
Bug#306695: nagios: logcheck lines, please
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT
>
> (although that may be too broad)
Can you provide the log messages that this matches?
Thanks,
--
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
pgp
2008 Jun 24
1
Bug#475553: not fixable with current logcheck
tags 475553 wontfix
thanks
While I completely agree that this /should/ be fixed in logcheck, it
can't be, since the logcheck rulefile format *sucks*, meaning
/every/ rule would have to be extended to support both styles.
I am sorry, but I have to mark this wontfix.
I hope that one day, someone will get up and write logfilter, which
I've started to draft on the wiki.logcheck.org page.
2006 Feb 09
1
Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 352043 logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Bug reassigned from package `dovecot-common' to `logcheck'.
> retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Changed Bug title.
>
2006 Jul 10
0
Re : Please update debconf PO translation for the package logcheck 1.2.47
Hi there,
My updated Vietnamese translation is attached. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vi.po
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6969 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060710/4703d02c/attachment.obj
-------------- next part --------------
Regards,
Clytie Siddall
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first
attempt is listed in logcheck report
$ dpkg -l postgrey
ii postgrey 1.18-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA
Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2005 Apr 29
3
Bug#303661: logcheck: More openntpd improvements
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.39
Followup-For: Bug #303661
Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii
2005 Jul 28
2
Bug#320274: logcheck-database: Please add pop3 to dovecot
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please duplicate the imap-login related lines and change them to filter
out the equivalent messages emitted by pop3-login.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: wishlist
I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to
have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter
lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid
regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *"
line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course.
It would be
2006 Feb 06
1
Bug#351669: logcheck: [manual] the sudo(1) is missing from EXAMPLES
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
Current manual reads:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks to su(8) or sudo(8), which
change the user ID:
logcheck -o -t Check the logfiles without updating the offset. Print
everything to STDOUT
I believe this shuold be formatted as:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks
2007 Sep 22
0
dhclient: parse_option_buffer: option ... larger than buffer
Lately, I've been getting messages of the form
dhclient: parse_option_buffer: option unknown-177 (65) larger than
buffer.
from logcheck. dhclient has not been updated, so this is likely
a change in the configuration of my ISP.
As the logcheck maintainer, I now wonder what I should do with
those. In general, I tend to think that ignoring such warnings is
safe because the software caught
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353868: logcheck-database: no longer ignores "spamd: checking message ..."
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: minor
Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to
1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of
the form
Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286
Could you please edit the second pattern in
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
[._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER
[-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+
\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$
basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users,
I get so many of those that I don't even