Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#369603: logcheck-database: new rule for dhcpd"
2010 Feb 07
2
Bug#568815: Redundant messages from dhcpd in logcheck output in "server" mode.
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Logcheck's reports contains many messages like:
Feb 7 19:03:57 srv dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 172.21.0.126 from 00:19:7e:9f:cc:32 (Hostname
Unsuitable for Printing) via eth0
Feb 7 19:03:57 srv dhcpd: DHCPACK on 172.21.0.126 to 00:19:7e:9f:cc:32 (Hostname
Unsuitable for Printing) via eth0
I create file
2006 Jan 07
2
Bug#346350: logcheck-database: dhcp3-server ignores need to include (none ) client host name
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.39
Severity: normal
I use dhcp3-server and a dhcp client which is Sony HDD video recorder
CoCoon. The client not return client host name.
In this case, dhcpd server assumed the client host name is (none).
Therefor dhcpd output log described below.
> Jan 7 10:49:24 on-o dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:46:33:55:77 ((none)) via eth0
> Jan 7 10:49:25
2004 Jul 21
4
Bug#260743: logcheck-database: dhcp rule updates for failover support
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.23
Severity: minor
Hi,
a couple of minor corrections to the dhcp rule sets:
First of all, the hostname matching parts need to include the "._-"
signs (maybe . is not needed but it might be).
Then when using failover, log lines of type DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST
may be entailed by the string ": load balance to peer <somestring>".
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was
looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to
the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part
of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
2009 Oct 24
1
Bug#552222: logcheck: dhclient regexes need updating
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
As reported in https://launchpad.net/bugs/307847:
recent dhclient includes the ip address it is releasing and renewing.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dhclient(-2.2.x)?: DHCP(NAK|ACK|OFFER) from [.0-9]{7,15}$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2010 Jul 28
1
Bug#590679: [logcheck-database] rules for ntpd
Package: logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
some rules for ntpd as i couldn't find any:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: time reset
[+-]*[0-9]{1,2}\.[0-9]{6} s$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: synchronisation
lost$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: no servers
reachable$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2004 Jun 21
2
Bug#255560: logcheck-database: More Postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.22a
Severity: normal
Thanks to the upgrade to Postfix 2.1 and deploying a newer logcheck
ruleset on a busier server I've found a bunch more rules for Postfix.
I've attached new rules files and patches are inline.
The following patch is for violations.ignore.d:
--- logcheck-postfix.orig 2004-06-21 20:11:14.000000000 +0100
+++ logcheck-postfix
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
[._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER
[-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+
\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$
basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users,
I get so many of those that I don't even
2009 Apr 03
1
ssh failed login rule problem
Hi there,
I know this is the classic RTFM list question but... I've really tried
hard on this and no result!
This is what I'm receving from logcheck:
System Events
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Apr 3 06:55:13 bsg sshd[32246]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication
failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=123.233.245.226
user=root
Apr 3 06:55:19 bsg sshd[32248]: pam_unix(sshd:auth):
2005 Jul 11
3
Bug#317741: logcheck-database: fails to ignore properly some lines from 'rbldnsd'
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
There are one line that is not properly ignored. I include in the report
a better version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale:
2008 Jan 24
0
[PATCH] Added "Re-using pre-shared static key" openvpn rule
Signed-off-by: Fr?d?ric Bri?re <fbriere at fbriere.net>
---
rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
index 68ebf8f..c57e3cb 100644
--- a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
+++ b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
@@ -13,7 +13,7
2008 Jan 24
0
[PATCH] Re-enabled :port portion of "UDPv4 link" openvpn rule
I see that this openvpn rule has been modified to no longer attach the
":port" part to "[undef]" -- probably to reflect a recent change in
openvpn. Unfortunately, the rule no longer matches in etch, thus
breaking the backport.
Here's a patch to match both versions.
Signed-off-by: Fr?d?ric Bri?re <fbriere at fbriere.net>
---
rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
2005 May 15
1
Bug#191637: New rules for qpopper
package logcheck-database
tags 125794 pending
tags 191637 pending
thanks
I've been running the latest version of qpopper from unstable for a few
days and I've added the following rules to CVS:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]: connect from
[._[:alnum:]-]+$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]:
\(v[.[:digit:]]+\) POP login by user
2004 Jun 11
4
Bug#253861: logcheck: Please add support for imapproxy
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.22a
Severity: wishlist
There is no support for imapproxy, and it would be a great help if it
was added. Following are two sample lines from the syslog:
Jun 11 09:36:55 MyHost in.imapproxyd[30845]: LOGOUT: '"MyUser"' from
server sd [13]
Jun 11 09:37:02 MyHost in.imapproxyd[30846]: LOGIN: '"MyUser"'
(xxx.xxx.xxx.xx:yyyyy) on
2004 Oct 13
2
Bug#276317: logcheck-database: Namechange for ISC in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhcp
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.28
Severity: normal
Hi,
the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium.
For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel:
2011 Dec 31
0
[PATCH] i.d.s/openvpn: support 'remote-cert-tls (server|client)'
From: Simon Deziel <simon.deziel at gmail.com>
Fixes LP: #806537
Signed-off-by: Simon Deziel <simon.deziel at gmail.com>
---
rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn
index 2b4bfd6..d80f42f 100644
---
2004 Jul 21
1
Bug#260573: logcheck: ignore.d.paranoid/cron and ignore.d.server/cron swapped
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.23
Severity: normal
Hello,
I have:
# /bin/cat ignore.d.server/cron
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ crontab\[[0-9]+\]: \([[:alnum:]-]+\) LIST \([[:alnum:]-]+\)$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ crontab\[[0-9]+\]: \([[:alnum:]-]+\) REPLACE \([[:alnum:]-]+\)$
and:
# /bin/cat ignore.d.paranoid/cron
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
Bug#551340: [logcheck-database] Rule in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-su does not match
2009 Oct 17
1
Bug#551340: [logcheck-database] Rule in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-su does not match
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I think that this rule:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ su\[[0-9]+\]: (\+|-)
(pts/[0-9]{1,2}|tty[0-9]) [_[:alnum:]-]+:[_[:alnum:]-]+$
is supposed to filter out lines like:
Oct 17 14:49:24 myhost su[13469]: + /dev/pts/1 user1:root
It is not working because the pattern dos not include the "/dev/" part
and
2004 Oct 11
1
Bug#275946: Acknowledgement (newline not recognized when logcheck sends emails)
I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results.
Here are the rules I added.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\]
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\]
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2004 Dec 21
3
Bug#286747: logcheck-database: ignore rules for USB headset
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: wishlist
Ignore rules to supress messages generated from pugging in, and
then removing, a USB headset (one speaker).
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ kernel: drivers\/usb\/class\/audio\.c: v1.0.0:USB Audio Class driver$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ kernel: usbaudio: assuming that a stereo channel connected directly to a mixer is