Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/docs"
2004 May 15
2
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
hey todd,
looked again at that return value check merge:
@@ -557,7 +584,8 @@
# the same lines) and reduce CPU and memory usage afterwards.
debug "Sorting logs"
$SORT -m $TMPDIR/logoutput/* | uniq | sed -e 's/ *$//' \
- > $TMPDIR/logoutput-sorted
+ > $TMPDIR/logoutput-sorted \
+ ||error "Could not output to $TMPDIR/logoutput-sorted Disk Full?"
i guess
2004 Jun 13
2
Bug#149567: logcheck: wish it could split reports to multiple people
hello russel,
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, russell at coker.com.au wrote:
..
> I would like to be able to have different parts of the report sent to
> different people. For example if I install a new daemon on a server
> I want the messages for that daemon going only to me (not the entire
> admin team) until I get it working properly. Otherwise excessive
> spurious messages lead
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database
version: 1.2.23
severity: wishlist
The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp..
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]:
to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\],
delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$
..doesn't catch these messages:
Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2004 Oct 11
1
Bug#275946: Acknowledgement (newline not recognized when logcheck sends emails)
I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results.
Here are the rules I added.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\]
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\]
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
2006 Feb 09
1
Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 352043 logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Bug reassigned from package `dovecot-common' to `logcheck'.
> retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Changed Bug title.
>
2005 Jul 28
2
Bug#320274: logcheck-database: Please add pop3 to dovecot
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please duplicate the imap-login related lines and change them to filter
out the equivalent messages emitted by pop3-login.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first
attempt is listed in logcheck report
$ dpkg -l postgrey
ii postgrey 1.18-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA
Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2004 Aug 23
2
Bug#267587: logcheck-database: Additional rule needed for postfix
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.25
Severity: normal
postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: lost connection after (CONNECT|DATA|RCPT|RSET|EHLO|HELO|MAIL) from
Please include the above line in the ignore.d/server/postfix file. That
catches messages that occur very often on busy Postfix servers.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then
> - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report
> + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \
> + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?"
> fi
> }
>
> @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@
> # Add a footer
2005 Apr 29
3
Bug#303661: logcheck: More openntpd improvements
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.39
Followup-For: Bug #303661
Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii
2005 Apr 28
1
Bug#306695: nagios: logcheck lines, please
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT
>
> (although that may be too broad)
Can you provide the log messages that this matches?
Thanks,
--
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
pgp
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS
problem shortly after it was sent.
----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org>
To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org>
Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: wishlist
I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to
have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter
lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid
regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *"
line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course.
It would be
2005 Jul 20
0
(fwd) Bug#319169: logcheck: chokes on log files whose names contain spaces
i did some cleanup first, but now i'm choking on a much earlier stage
than i first thought.
-- logcheck
for file in $(egrep --text -v "(^#|^[[:space:]]*$)" $LOGFILES_LIST); do
logoutput "$file"
done
--
that falls apart if you insert in /etc/logcheck/logcheck.logfiles
a line like
/var/log/auth .log
even if you escape it with "", which is a valid
2004 Sep 01
2
dedup and sort rules
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: parse_logcheck
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3860 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20040901/b1727d89/attachment.obj
2006 Feb 06
1
Bug#351669: logcheck: [manual] the sudo(1) is missing from EXAMPLES
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
Current manual reads:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks to su(8) or sudo(8), which
change the user ID:
logcheck -o -t Check the logfiles without updating the offset. Print
everything to STDOUT
I believe this shuold be formatted as:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks
2006 Mar 29
2
Bug#359878: logcheck: extend exim rules to cope with multiple recipients
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii adduser 3.77 Add and remove
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353868: logcheck-database: no longer ignores "spamd: checking message ..."
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: minor
Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to
1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of
the form
Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286
Could you please edit the second pattern in