similar to: Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern

Package: logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Hi! if autossh debug is enabled it logs to syslog, thus the messages go thru logcheck, messages are in this form May 19 14:02:55 sagara autossh[1909]: port set to 0, monitoring disabled so this is the ignore line ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ autossh\[[0-9]+\]: .*$ thanks, filippo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:

Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out of logcheck-database. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked

Package: logcheck Severity: wishlist I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.37 Severity: normal Hello again, openntpd gives messages like these failry often: Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info for me.

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the patterns for pure-ftpd in ignore.d.server are not matching a user with a trailing whitespace. here a some examples: Feb 18 13:02:33 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [NOTICE] /example/example.txt downloaded (5908 bytes, 152196.03KB/sec) Feb 18 13:16:14 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [INFO] Logout. every

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing mail server to get security patches again or is it not critical to use

On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote: > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT > > (although that may be too broad) Can you provide the log messages that this matches? Thanks, -- -jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org pgp

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: wishlist I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *" line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course. It would be

Le 19/06/2019 ? 22:05, Phil Perry a ?crit?: > Try following the Postgrey guide on the Wiki: > > https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postgrey#head-314ceecc5ece27e0f0a4bf1abcd8ee9356cd1a5e > > > Works for me (allowing for the switch to systemd) I've followed this document, and still no joy. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730

Hi folks, I have installed postgrey from the rpmforge repo, but it does not work well with postfix from CentOS 5.2: I always get the error: warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission denied problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied But the permissions on the socket seem okay (postfix could write to it): srw-rw-rw- 1 postgrey postgrey 0 4. Okt 14:48 socket I

Hi, I have a working installation of Postfix and Dovecot that works nicely. I've added SpamAssassin, which does a good job of flagging spam. Now I wanted to add greylisting to my server. Here's what I did. $ sudo yum install postgrey Increase the greylisting delay. # /etc/sysconfig/postgrey POSTGREY_OPTS="--delay=300" Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf accordingly.

Hello all, I am looking for the correct way to add postgrey to my system but whitelist everything except for com, org, and net domains. Most of my spam is from .info domains. There seems to be no way to only go after certain domains, instead postgrey wants to go after everything except what you whitelist. So my idea was to whitelist .com, .net, .org, .gov, and a few others while greylisting

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.31 Severity: wishlist The following is reported by logcheck when inserting a USB joystick for the first time (workstation), none of which (I assume) I need to be informed of. Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.2: wakeup Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using address 2 Nov 21 17:50:10 localhost kernel:

Hi, We have implemented postgrey (postgrey-1.24, compiled from source package) on a centos 4.3 server. It works except for the whitelistings, in file postgrey_whitelist_clients, no matter what domain we enter, their incoming mails gets greylisted. I have posted this question to postgrey list but have not received anything yet. I works OK on a centos 4.1 server. Has anyone experienced similar

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > >

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.39 Followup-For: Bug #303661 Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: normal Hi, the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium. For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel:

Le 20/06/2019 ? 11:28, Alexander Dalloz a ?crit?: > What is being logged when a message passes your MTA inbound? The answer > to your issue is within the maillog. According to maillog, the message is delivered instantly, exactly like on a normal configuration without Postgrey. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site :

Hi Guys, Are you interested in a brief guide on how to set up postgrey (anti-spam greylisting) with postfix? I set it up today and it took me a while to get it working as the config is slightly different from that on many of the googled guides (many are debian/ubuntu based). The darn config file lives in /etc/sysconfig on RH/CentOS rather than /etc/default as mentioned in all the guides I