similar to: Bug#260810: Addition to bug 260810: lmtp rule

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#260810: Addition to bug 260810: lmtp rule"

2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2005 Dec 24
1
Bug#344620: ignore.server.d/postfix: 'address not listed for hostname' rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.42 Severity: normal Tags: patch Index: postfix =================================================================== --- postfix (revision 1097) +++ postfix (working copy) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ # Postfix < 2.1 ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: connect to [^[:space:]]+: server dropped connection without sending the initial greeting
2004 Jun 21
2
Bug#255560: logcheck-database: More Postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.22a Severity: normal Thanks to the upgrade to Postfix 2.1 and deploying a newer logcheck ruleset on a busier server I've found a bunch more rules for Postfix. I've attached new rules files and patches are inline. The following patch is for violations.ignore.d: --- logcheck-postfix.orig 2004-06-21 20:11:14.000000000 +0100 +++ logcheck-postfix
2004 Jul 21
4
Bug#260743: logcheck-database: dhcp rule updates for failover support
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.23 Severity: minor Hi, a couple of minor corrections to the dhcp rule sets: First of all, the hostname matching parts need to include the "._-" signs (maybe . is not needed but it might be). Then when using failover, log lines of type DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST may be entailed by the string ": load balance to peer <somestring>".
2006 Dec 24
0
Bug#404422: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp messages not ignored by ignore.d.server/postfix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.51 Severity: normal Messages such as these are no longer being filtered by logcheck ('hostname' used to replace actual hostname; 'hostname.com' used to replace actual domain): Dec 23 12:02:58 hostname postfix/lmtp[5047]: 38BE4C21ED: to=<root at hostname.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=4.1, delays=2/0.16/0.05/1.8,
2005 Apr 26
3
Bug#306388: add ignore line for udhcpd
Package: logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Hi, the following two lines should be added either to ignore.d.server/dhcp or ignore.d.server/udhcp to ignore messages from udhcpd (other lines may be necessary) # udhcpd support ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udhcpd\[[0-9]+\]: sending OFFER of [.0-9]+ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udhcpd\[[0-9]+\]: sending ACK to [.0-9]+ filippo
2006 May 21
2
Bug#368313: logcheck-database: new postfix violations ignore rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix : ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:
2006 Jan 07
2
Bug#346350: logcheck-database: dhcp3-server ignores need to include (none ) client host name
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: normal I use dhcp3-server and a dhcp client which is Sony HDD video recorder CoCoon. The client not return client host name. In this case, dhcpd server assumed the client host name is (none). Therefor dhcpd output log described below. > Jan 7 10:49:24 on-o dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:46:33:55:77 ((none)) via eth0 > Jan 7 10:49:25
2004 Jul 21
1
Bug#260573: logcheck: ignore.d.paranoid/cron and ignore.d.server/cron swapped
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.23 Severity: normal Hello, I have: # /bin/cat ignore.d.server/cron ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ crontab\[[0-9]+\]: \([[:alnum:]-]+\) LIST \([[:alnum:]-]+\)$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ crontab\[[0-9]+\]: \([[:alnum:]-]+\) REPLACE \([[:alnum:]-]+\)$ and: # /bin/cat ignore.d.paranoid/cron ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2004 Oct 11
1
Bug#275946: Acknowledgement (newline not recognized when logcheck sends emails)
I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results. Here are the rules I added. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2006 May 30
2
Bug#369603: logcheck-database: new rule for dhcpd
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.44 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, This patch changes one rule for dhcpd. It adds support for log lines of the following format: May 30 19:36:57 server dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.10.10.10 (aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff) via eth1 Regards, Robbert --- /root/dhcp 2006-05-30 21:50:24.000000000 +0200 +++ dhcp 2006-05-30 23:27:06.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
2004 Aug 10
1
one = sign to much?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think I found a mistake in the postfix file in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server. There is one equal sign to much in this line: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: [[:alnum:]]+: client=[^[:space:]]+, sasl_method=[[:alnum:]]+, sasl_username==[-_.@[:alnum:]]+$ I think it should be: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal Tags: patch The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM. -- System Information: Debian Release:
2004 Dec 21
3
Bug#286747: logcheck-database: ignore rules for USB headset
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: wishlist Ignore rules to supress messages generated from pugging in, and then removing, a USB headset (one speaker). ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ kernel: drivers\/usb\/class\/audio\.c: v1.0.0:USB Audio Class driver$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ kernel: usbaudio: assuming that a stereo channel connected directly to a mixer is
2004 Oct 13
2
Bug#276317: logcheck-database: Namechange for ISC in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhcp
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: normal Hi, the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium. For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel:
2019 Aug 08
5
Underscores in package names
Are there technical reasons that package names cannot be snake case? This seems to be enforced by `.standard_regexps()$valid_package_name` which currently returns "[[:alpha:]][[:alnum:].]*[[:alnum:]]" Is there any technical reason this couldn't be altered to accept `_` as well, e.g. "[[:alpha:]][[:alnum:]._]*[[:alnum:]]" I realize that historically `_` has not
2004 Sep 12
2
Bug#271286: minor fix for ignore.d.server/oidentd
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.27 Severity: wishlist hello, in ignore.d.server/oidentd you have: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ oidentd\[[0-9]+\]: Connection from \ [._[:alnum:]-]+ \([0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\):[0-9]{1,5}$ anyway, some oidentd logs don't have a hostname: oidentd[34562]: Connection from 241.145.24.135:2353 therefore you have to add: ^\w{3} [
2017 Aug 23
0
Flummoxed by gsub().
Inline. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Rolf Turner <r.turner at auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > > On 23/08/17 18:33, Stefan Evert wrote: > >> >>> On 23 Aug 2017,
2009 Apr 03
1
ssh failed login rule problem
Hi there, I know this is the classic RTFM list question but... I've really tried hard on this and no result! This is what I'm receving from logcheck: System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-= Apr 3 06:55:13 bsg sshd[32246]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=123.233.245.226 user=root Apr 3 06:55:19 bsg sshd[32248]: pam_unix(sshd:auth):
2005 Jul 11
3
Bug#317741: logcheck-database: fails to ignore properly some lines from 'rbldnsd'
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.40 Severity: normal Tags: patch There are one line that is not properly ignored. I include in the report a better version. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: