similar to: [nut-commits] svn commit r3071 - branches/apcsmart-dev/drivers

Citeren Michal Soltys <msoltyspl-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > @@ -417,10 +414,12 @@ > if (flags & SER_CC) { > iset = IGN_CCCHARS; > aset = ""; > + sec = 6; usec = 0; > } > if (flags & SER_CS) { > iset = IGN_CSCHARS; > aset = ""; > + sec = 6; usec = 0; > } > > memset(buf, '\0', buflen);

Citeren Michal Soltys <msoltyspl-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > @@ -251,14 +251,14 @@ > if (do_lock_port) { > errno = 0; > ret = 0; > -#ifdef HAVE_UU_LOCK > + #ifdef HAVE_UU_LOCK > ret = uu_lock(xbasename(device_path)); > -#elif defined(HAVE_FLOCK) > + #elif defined(HAVE_FLOCK) > ret = flock(fd, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB); > -#elif

Thanks for the help, with the apcsmart-old driver it works again! Didn't notice my UPS is now so "old" ;-) Here is the output of upsc with apcsmart-old driver: battery.alarm.threshold: 0 battery.charge: 100.0 battery.charge.restart: 00 battery.date: 11/22/06 battery.packs: 001 battery.packs.bad: 000 battery.runtime: 540 battery.runtime.low: 120 battery.voltage: 53.73

Sorry for a bit longer delay than I anticipated, I was stuffed with the work. This is the next iteration of the patch adding some functionality to apcsmart driver, and relying on 'ignorelb' recently added. Follow up from previous thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02331.html Main differences is that V3 is split into many small patches, so the

Inital tests with two apc units (2005 and pre-2000) seem to go well. See commit message for details. I'll add more detailed rationale after getting some sleep :) Michal Soltys (1): apcsmart: switch processing to ICANON + minor fixes drivers/apcsmart.c | 270 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/apcsmart.h | 127 ++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 267

On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Michal Soltys wrote: > I'm still a bit reluctant to merge it without a bit wider exposure, so if anyone has a possiblity to test it with some apc units - any feedback would be most welcome. Apparently, a lot of people are using NUT via packages, so: * users might not want to build from source if things are working * the packagers might not pick up a 2.7.x

On Jun 13, 2013, at 7:14 AM, ML mail wrote: > I just upgraded to Network UPS Tools upsstats 2.6.4 on Debian wheezy and noticed that it does not show the battery runtime anymore, the field is simply empty. It used to work before with NUT 2.4.1. Does anyone know what could be wrong? > > I am using the apcsmart UPS driver. The apcsmart driver was overhauled, and in 2.6.x, the previous

Hi Michal, I've cc'ed -upsdev, since some info could be interesting for everybody. 2011/5/27 Michal Soltys <soltys at ziu.info> > On 11-05-25 09:35, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > 2011/5/25 Michal Soltys <soltys at ziu.info <mailto:soltys at ziu.info>> > >(...) > > > > I'm preparing larger patchset with

Before I start any commits. In patch 2/18 - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2011-March/005299.html Two "custom" commands slipped in: ups.firmware.old and shutdown.return.grace. In 18/18 I tried to rename them and add remainig commands for "hackish" shutdown methods, to make them easily callable through e.g. upscmd (for example for testing). Is it

Hello, I just upgraded to Network UPS Tools upsstats 2.6.4 on Debian wheezy and noticed that it does not show the battery runtime anymore, the field is simply empty. It used to work before with NUT 2.4.1. Does anyone know what could be wrong? I am using the apcsmart UPS driver. Thanks, M.L.

2011/2/15 Lupe Christoph > On Monday, 2011-02-14 at 21:54:20 -0000, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > I definitely need more info! > > please reply to ALL: > > > - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing? > > SmartUPS 300I NET. I have the serial number (GS9809283199) but no date. > it seems to be a recent model. > - are you sure this unit is ok? > >

2011/2/15 Lupe Christoph > On Monday, 2011-02-14 at 21:54:20 -0000, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > I definitely need more info! > > please reply to ALL: > > > - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing? > > SmartUPS 300I NET. I have the serial number (GS9809283199) but no date. > it seems to be a recent model. > - are you sure this unit is ok? > >

This is 2nd version of the earlier patch featuring a few new features and fixes to the apcsmart driver, following the remarks in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02294.html Major changes from v1: - handle battery.charge and battery.runtime checks at main.c level - handle "immutable but writable" conflict gracefully at driver level -

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I have several old, yet functioning APC Smart-UPS (Model 600LS, Part AP600I, Firmware 6JI, no EEPROM, from 1991). They are not supported by Powerchute any more. I run NUT 2.6.5-4 on Windows XP SP3. I use COM1 port with cable 940-0024C. The connection fails with APC Smart protocol driver 3.0 (2.6.3-3534:3540M), APC command table version 3.0 or higher - it works with APC

On several occasions I have seen the apcsmart process runaway using 100% CPU while filling my syslog partition by logging the following syslog entries at an incredible rate. I have seen up to 21,800 log entries PER SECOND of the following nature: --[snip]-- Jun 25 10:06:38 servername apcsmart[4012]: Communications with UPS lost: Communications with UPS lost - check cabling Jun 25 10:06:38

Hi Michal, I'm cc'ing the NUT development mailing list. you should also subscribe to it. 2010/10/28 Michal Soltys > Greetings > > I have loads of relatively old smart upses that I currently control using a > bit patched version of apcupsd - the reason for those patches is the age of > the upses - roughly 10 years old+, which are can be a bit tricky to control. > From

G'day y'all, Here's a tiny patch set for drivers/apcsmart.c and drivers/apcsmart.h. Adds APC SmartUPS 1250 ("8QD" case) + 940-0024C recognition to apcsmart. (Unpatched apcsmart.c v1.99.8 misidentifies the SmartUPS 1250 as a "dumb" UPS.) For NUT 2.0.5+. NUT 2.0.5: Patches apply successfully. Builds successfully. Works as expected under Ubuntu 7.04. NUT 2.2:

Hi, The devel branch has some long standing updates implemented - mostly a result from past bug/issue reports. Among those: - selectable normal / canonical mode (useful in windows and perhaps with some problematic usb/rs cards) - some compat entries - certain (old) class of psus returning something else through 'b' treated as a whole set - can handle mutlivalue entries (e.g.

Hi, The devel branch has some long standing updates implemented - mostly a result from past bug/issue reports. Among those: - selectable normal / canonical mode (useful in windows and perhaps with some problematic usb/rs cards) - some compat entries - certain (old) class of psus returning something else through 'b' treated as a whole set - can handle mutlivalue entries (e.g.

This patch introduces a handful of new options, I mentioned earlier in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02088.html See the large commit message in the follow-up for the details and rationale. I realize it's a bit larger diff - so if it's required I can split it into few smaller ones. Michal Soltys (1): APC smart driver update and new features.