similar to: ssl-nss-port branch does not compile on Ubuntu (asciidoc)

Emilien, just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. The problem is that we do not have a good branch in Git to work from. The windows_port branch got rebased, but since it has merge commits, it is a bit of a mess. I apologize for

2014/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > Emilien, > > just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! > We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. I am just fixing some bugs and implementing some minor windows-specific features. > The problem is that

I would like to learn AsciiDoc. Is there any good examples how to use AsciiDoc with R? I know that there is packages called ascii to do this, but it would be nice to see some examples how AsciiDoc works with R. Is there an AsciiDoc distribution for Max OS X? -Johannes

On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Tue Jul 13 22:59:52 2010 > New Revision: 2472 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2472 [...] > Modified: branches/AsciiDoc/docs/Makefile.am > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > ---

Arnaud, Thanks for removing the warning. I suspect that many users still using IE6 are doing so because of their IT department (rather than personal preference). IMHO, browser evangelism is slightly outside the scope of the NUT project :-) On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Arnaud Quette<aquette at alioth.debian.org> wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Thu Sep 3 12:31:10 2009 > New

Since I've heard about AsciiDoc (thanks ESR), I'm in the process of revamping the full Network UPS Tools documentation and website. Without going into the usual "it curred my desease, got my wife back home, and made me won a billion", it really saved my life ^_ ^ I was searching for such tool for years! thanks a lot Stuart and others. Kudos for the work! NUT revamp is not yet

Hi, No patches today, sorry, just three little observations (i'm compiling windows_port branch on Debian GNU/Linux testing with mingw): * missing but required by the configure scripts/augeas/nutupsconf.aug.in scripts/hal/ups-nut-device.fdi.in scripts/udev/nut-usbups.rules.in * it autodetects hal and udev support but (of course) fails to cross-compile it (so i had to use

I need to install asciidoc on my build machine. There is a version for CentOS-5 available at dags rpm site. I have a repository configured for dag like so: [dag] name=Dag Wieers RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux #Also see URL http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/ baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el$releasever/en/$basearch/dag gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt

FYI (mostly Charles and Arjen), a2x version has just been bumped to 8.6.3 in their trunk. So we will be able revert r2686 cheers, Arno 2010/11/12 Stuart Rackham > > > On 12/11/10 10:45, Arnaud Quette wrote: > >> Hi Stuart, >> >> 2010/11/10 Stuart Rackham >> >> The planned 28-Oct release date has slipped by, in the mean time I >> think all

On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 03:46 +0000, Charles Lepple wrote: > Author: clepple-guest > Date: Fri Dec 9 03:46:11 2011 > New Revision: 3344 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3344 > > Log: > Force files to be overwritten (especially for libtool) > > Modified: > branches/nut-scanner_dlopen/autogen.sh > > Modified:

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org> wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Mon Sep 14 20:49:59 2009 > New Revision: 1986 > > Log: > draft index of manual pages > > Added: > branches/AsciiDoc/docs/man/index.txt Cool! One potential issue: /sw/bin/asciidoc --backend=xhtml11 \ --attribute localdate=`TZ=UTC date +%Y-%m-%d` \

2012/10/12 Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com> > Hi guys, > Hi Emilien and the list, This is a pull request to finally merge NSS feature in nut trunk: > https://github.com/clepple/nut/pull/3 > I'd like to take a moment to shed some more light on this important development, which lasted 3 years: - the initial

2010/11/4 Arjen de Korte > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Nov 4 22:40:51 2010 > New Revision: 2671 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2671 > > Log: > Exclude -I. and extra developer warning flags with Net-SNMP support enabled > (using them is the responsibility of the NUT developers) > > Modified: >

Hello, I'm starting to think that converting the Syslinux documentation to asciidoc would be the best, and probably easiest, way to get some kind of consistency between the web docs and what is shipped. I don't think it would be all that hard to do (see http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/). Anyone interested in trying to tackle this? -hpa

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > Author: aquette > Date: Fri Dec 17 23:32:20 2010 > New Revision: 2748 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2748 > > Log: > --with-doc=auto now behave depending on AsciiDoc presence Instead of building whatever can be build (depending on the versions found), you now have changed the

On Nov 4, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Nov 4 22:21:51 2010 > New Revision: 2669 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2669 > > Log: > Add checking minimum required version for AsciiDoc tools I noticed that somewhere around this commit, the documentation stopped being built by default in BuildBot.

The following changes since commit ddb10ce99c327888ade4d2ba3e4c50ad12aaa059: Matt Fleming (1): Delete 16-bit COMBOOT support are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/geneC/syslinux.git doc-elflink-for-mfleming Gene Cumm (3): txt/: Add new AsciiDoc formatted documentation Makefile: add txt/ NEWS: add txt/ Makefile | 2 +- NEWS

c'est quoi cette chelouzerie ? je parle de l'ajout du sizeof(DWORD)... et ce que ce serait pas un str*n*cpy ou s*n*printf la vraie solution ? Arno 2012/5/3 Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Thu May ?3 08:31:38 2012 > New Revision: 3554 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3554 > > Log: >

I'm looking for a little bit of help with the man page conversion. So far, about a third of the man pages are converted, and I think it would make sense to have a second or third set of eyes compare the output to be sure that we are not losing any information in the conversion process. In the tarballs generated from the AsciiDoc branch on http://buildbot.ghz.cc/public/nut/ you will find the

Can someone double-check the UTF-8 in the rhino Authors section? Showed up fine locally on my machine, but my web browser insists that it is Latin-1. - Charles On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple-guest at alioth.debian.org > wrote: > Author: clepple-guest > Date: Tue Dec 1 03:30:32 2009 > New Revision: 2147 > > Log: > AsciiDoc: convert powerpanel