similar to: [RFC] Updates to ACP smart driver

This is 2nd version of the earlier patch featuring a few new features and fixes to the apcsmart driver, following the remarks in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02294.html Major changes from v1: - handle battery.charge and battery.runtime checks at main.c level - handle "immutable but writable" conflict gracefully at driver level -

Sorry for a bit longer delay than I anticipated, I was stuffed with the work. This is the next iteration of the patch adding some functionality to apcsmart driver, and relying on 'ignorelb' recently added. Follow up from previous thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02331.html Main differences is that V3 is split into many small patches, so the

G'day y'all, Here's a tiny patch set for drivers/apcsmart.c and drivers/apcsmart.h. Adds APC SmartUPS 1250 ("8QD" case) + 940-0024C recognition to apcsmart. (Unpatched apcsmart.c v1.99.8 misidentifies the SmartUPS 1250 as a "dumb" UPS.) For NUT 2.0.5+. NUT 2.0.5: Patches apply successfully. Builds successfully. Works as expected under Ubuntu 7.04. NUT 2.2:

Fellows, time has come for a new NUT release: I'm planning on 2.6.1 next week (max Friday 27), and I'm currently processing remaining patches. If you have some more on your side, please send in. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer -

I could not make the bestfortress driver 0.02 work for my Best Fortress LI675VA, so I have made a patch for the driver. The reason was, that all responses are preceded and terminated by CR LF, but the driver would discard everything after the first CR LF. The following patch discards everything up to the first LF. It also adds a debugging feature of displaying the accepted data (level 5 i.e. -D

I have a new APC Smart-UPS SUA2200RM2U. I've had no success with the manufacturer's PowerChute software and smart signaling, so I have decided to try NUT. The smartups driver can't make contact through the serial port. Since this is rack-mounted, it comes with a 940-1524 serial cable. As far as I can tell, this is supposed to work with smart signaling. Here's my ups.conf:

Dear Andreas, some googling revealed, you created a driver for the xanto series of online-usv.de. In what state it is currently? I've to manage a S2000 and would like to use nut for it, is it usable by now? Do you need another tester? TIA, Pete

I have a new SMART1050SLT Tripp Lite UPS that both tripplite and tripplitesu drivers hate. Both simply time out with a "can't find" message. Does anyone know about the SmartPro series?

Hi Arnaud, Hi Scott, Hi list, Here is a patch to support the Zinto D from ONLINE USV-Systeme AG. I already sent a version to Russell Kroll (2006-04-09), without no response and I cannot find support for Zinto in svn until now. I found a discussion on this list about the Xanto from ONLINE, but the Zinto seems to use different commands. The commands are quite similar to those for Opti-UPS, so I

Description: Replace many usleep and some sleep calls with nanosleep. usleep is stated in its manual page as removed by POSIX. Contrary to its predecessors, nanosleep semantics is well defined. The replacement, which is mostly in drivers, is untested. Supplements http://bugs.debian.org/633791. Last-Update: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:04:48 +0300 Index:

On several occasions I have seen the apcsmart process runaway using 100% CPU while filling my syslog partition by logging the following syslog entries at an incredible rate. I have seen up to 21,800 log entries PER SECOND of the following nature: --[snip]-- Jun 25 10:06:38 servername apcsmart[4012]: Communications with UPS lost: Communications with UPS lost - check cabling Jun 25 10:06:38

Hi there, I am using an old (really old) APC Smart-UPS 600. It worked fine under apcupsd but when I tried NUT it did not work. The error I was getting was: sudo /lib/nut/apcsmart -DDD /dev/ttyS1 Network UPS Tools (version 2.0.4) - APC Smart protocol driver Driver version 1.99.8, command table version 2.0 debug level is '3' Attempting firmware lookup Firmware: [D4] Not found in

2009/5/3 Thomas Juerges > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Arnaud, > Hi Thomas, > I just checked the 2.4.1 version of nut and found that you forgot to add > my old UPS model (APC Smart-UPS 900). I guess it is because you were > busy at the time when I sent you the patch. So here it goes again. :) > uh, right sorry. I was pretty sure I applied

Hi Kirill, just to notify you that your al175 driver is being removed from the NUT tree, as of 2.4.0-pre1. if you wish to see it entering the tree again, please contact the Development mailing list to talk about it. Merry Christmas and happy New Year. Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader -

>From the language guide: "The one non-intuitive notation for constants is the optional hexadecimal form of floating point constants. For example, the form 'double 0x432ff973cafa8000' is equivalent to (but harder to read than) 'double 4.5e+15'. The only time hexadecimal floating point constants are required (and the only time that they are generated by the disassembler) is

I'm writing a C compiler in OCaml and I've run into a small problem. I wrote the following piece of code to generate a pointer to a string constant, so I could compile C expressions of the form "const char* p = "test\n";" : let strval = const_stringz codecontext v in dump_value strval; dump_value i32_zero; const_gep strval [| i32_zero; i32_zero |] The dump statements

Arnaud, > first, even if your battery is full, and your ups is online, there is a > small amount of power drawn. So having always is CHRG status is normal. > In fact, these complementary status are more interesting for higher end > UPSs. > > second, these status need not to be handled like LB, as each one clears the > other. While LB had no pending event (!LB) before... >

Question 1: I am trying to get a function not to be inlined. What are llvm's rules pertaining to inlining? I have tried all of the standard gcc options for turning off inlining and they do not seem to work. Here is the sample code that I am working with: #include <stdio.h> void print_string(char* strval); int main() { char* strval = "Hello world\n"; while(1){

Hi, my UPS is a Best Fortress LI1420 with the monitoring master running fedora 7. I have to replace the manufacturer's software "Checkups II" because it's not working with releases after fc4. My choice is the nut package. But it isn't just installing rpm's and configure the parameter files. ? The first hurdle to take was realising the UPS doesn't send a prompt.

Hello all, OS name: FreeNAS 9.3 NUT version: 2.7.2 NUT installed method: Bundled with FreenNAS 9.3 Device: EATON 5SC 1000 (http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/5SC.aspx?cx=5&wtredirect=www.eaton.com/5SC&GUID=B81251A4-F34E-4373-94B3-B4FB3D0CBCA8) Problem description: This was originally reported as bug to FreeNAS