similar to: [nut-commits] svn commit r2036 - trunk/man

OPENSOURCE wrote: > > I hope this answer your questions, and I hope you're ready to wait a bit > more. > Sure, NP for me, thanks for the feedback Arnaud. I have to admit that past days im having the syslog with a lil more activity from the new usb attached unit (ellipse ASR 1000 VA) Network UPS Tools: New USB/HID UPS driver 0.23 (2.0.2-pre2) Detected an UPS: MGE UPS

I'm trying to get nut to work with a Cyberpower 900AVR. There are many different products known by this name, but this one has the extra name 'BC900D'. I am told by a cyberpower tech that this one should talk exactly the same USB protocol as the 685AVR, which was recently made to work with newhidups. Unfortunately, when I run the SVN checkout (trunk) of nut-2.1, I get: sstreet

tags 354429 + upstream thank 2006/2/26, suicune@eml.cc <suicune@eml.cc>: > Package: nut > Version: 2.0.1-3 > > > This is the spam message: > drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: ctrl urb status -32 received > > I never once saw this message until after I installed and configured > nut. > > Spam begins during boot and continues infinitely until reboot or nut is >

hi, i've bought at HP storageworks DAT72 USB external tape drive and i'm trying to make it work under centos 4.2 first the hard facts: os - centos 4.2 kernel 2.4.9-22.0.2.EL MB - MSI 8kn diamong 4gb ram the problem is that i don't see the drive. i'd expected that a device called st0 would appear but it's not the case. watching the messages file when unplugging the

I have a ups that doesn't always (sometimes it does) load NUT right. I use Gentoo: * sys-power/nut Latest version available: 2.6.0-r1 Latest version installed: 2.6.0-r1 Size of files: 1,663 kB Homepage: http://www.networkupstools.org/ Description: Network-UPS Tools License: GPL-2 The kernel is 3.0.4. Here is the dmesg output:

Gentlemen, I think this question is mainly for Arnaud again: When I run my UPS directly with newhidups -D -D -D, with no data changes, and I then observe the interaction with my UPS (still Back-UPS ES 650 FW:818.w1.D USB FW:w1), I see the updateinfo cycle through 3 different forms: (1) a (2 bytes) => 06 08 notification that provides one item: UPS.PowerSummary.APCStatusFlag Note that

Hi, I keep getting the following messages (or similar) in my syslog: Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.921566] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -110 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.972569] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -75 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.976568] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL

I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. It happens several times a day that I get a message about Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret

Hello, I have a Salicru UPS in a Debian Wheezy connected with a USB HUB: # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub ... Bus 001 Device 003: ID 1a40:0201 Terminus Technology Inc. FE 2.1 7-port Hub Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0665:5161 Cypress Semiconductor USB to Serial The problem is that I have some failed messages: # dmesg ... [90941.136274] usb 1-3.7: usbfs:

Hi all, after a change of UPS (to Atlantis Host Power 851) I began to use the new driver blazer_usb and compared to old one (blazer used with serial connection) I noted more CPU use and errors in dmesg: [...] [256712.584370] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [256789.640795] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8

Soumya, its [root at mseas-data2 ~]# glusterfs --version glusterfs 3.7.11 built on Apr 27 2016 14:09:20 Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Red Hat, Inc. <http://www.redhat.com/> GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. It is licensed to you under your choice of the GNU Lesser General Public License, version 3 or any later version (LGPLv3

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Haley" <phaley at mit.edu> > To: "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>, gluster-users at gluster.org, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> > Cc: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com>, "Ravishankar N" <ravishankar at redhat.com>, "Raghavendra

On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote: > Are the messages a problem? Or could I ignore? Since they aren't happening on each poll interval, they are not a big problem. The driver should recognize -110 as a timeout, and retry the query.

2014-03-08 14:26 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Are the messages a problem? Or could I ignore? > > Since they aren't happening on each poll interval, they are not a big problem. The driver should recognize -110 as a timeout, and retry the query. Thanks for the

Hello list, I have a "Salicru SPS One 700VA" in a Debian Wheezy server. I configured a week ago, it works well, but today it start to show "UPS salicru at 192.168.x.x:3493 is unavailable" And I got this in the system logs: # dmesg [147080.501925] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 [147080.503913] usb 4-5: usbfs:

> - drivers/dstate-hal.[ch]: added sleep here, to limit the polling rate > (previously, the driver would completely ignore the poll interval and > would run upsdrv_updateinfo() without any delay in between) > > The changes to dstate-hal.[ch] should probably be backported to Testing > ASAP, since ignoring the poll_interval is not a good idea (you'll be > basically polling

please subscribe to the nut user mailing list ( http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser) and post the output of "/path/to/usbhid-ups -DDDDD -a <your_ups_name_in_ups.conf>" cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer -

hi all Using a vanilla 2.4.23, I try to setup the USB FXS interface to add an old gray 1960 rotary dial phone for a demo. But it doesn't work :( Can someone decipher the below messages and help me out here? Please ask if more info is needed roy usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 hub.c:

On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. Which kernel version? > It happens several times a day that I get a message about > > Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 > Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel:

Hi Soumya, We just had the opportunity to try the option of disabling the kernel-NFS and restarting glusterd to start gNFS. However the gluster demon crashes immediately on startup. What additional information besides what we provide below would help debugging this? Thanks, Pat -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: gluster-nfs crashing on start Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:05:09