similar to: [nut-commits] svn commit r1965 - branches/AsciiDoc/docs/man

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org> wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Mon Sep 14 20:49:59 2009 > New Revision: 1986 > > Log: > draft index of manual pages > > Added: > branches/AsciiDoc/docs/man/index.txt Cool! One potential issue: /sw/bin/asciidoc --backend=xhtml11 \ --attribute localdate=`TZ=UTC date +%Y-%m-%d` \

Can someone double-check the UTF-8 in the rhino Authors section? Showed up fine locally on my machine, but my web browser insists that it is Latin-1. - Charles On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple-guest at alioth.debian.org > wrote: > Author: clepple-guest > Date: Tue Dec 1 03:30:32 2009 > New Revision: 2147 > > Log: > AsciiDoc: convert powerpanel

On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Tue Jul 13 22:59:52 2010 > New Revision: 2472 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2472 [...] > Modified: branches/AsciiDoc/docs/Makefile.am > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > ---

Arnaud, Thanks for removing the warning. I suspect that many users still using IE6 are doing so because of their IT department (rather than personal preference). IMHO, browser evangelism is slightly outside the scope of the NUT project :-) On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Arnaud Quette<aquette at alioth.debian.org> wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Thu Sep 3 12:31:10 2009 > New

On Jul 28, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > some testing around the NUT Packager Guide to validate the general > approach of the new documentation. > The shell script is there to track the command line used to generate > the HTML output, and the generated HTML file to show the result. Hi Arnaud, would it be OK for me to merge the contents of the shell script into

On Nov 4, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Nov 4 22:21:51 2010 > New Revision: 2669 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2669 > > Log: > Add checking minimum required version for AsciiDoc tools I noticed that somewhere around this commit, the documentation stopped being built by default in BuildBot.

2010/11/4 Arjen de Korte > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Nov 4 22:40:51 2010 > New Revision: 2671 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2671 > > Log: > Exclude -I. and extra developer warning flags with Net-SNMP support enabled > (using them is the responsibility of the NUT developers) > > Modified: >

With the AsciiDoc conversion underway, I am wondering if we should keep the AsciiDoc for the driver man pages in a specially-formatted comment in the driver (taking a cue from the comments specifying USB information). I have been doing something similar with the tripplite_usb driver for a while - it contains Perl-style POD (Plain Old Documentation) in a C comment, and the man page can be

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > Author: aquette > Date: Sat Dec 11 12:31:21 2010 > New Revision: 2731 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731 > > Log: > Complete the list of Subversion ignored files, with AsciiDoc > generated contents (no functional changes) Is there a particular reason for having both the man/

On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > Author: clepple-guest > Date: Fri Aug 14 12:31:25 2009 > New Revision: 1931 > > Log: > Warn when making 'html' without asciidoc tool Heh. Now I get a warning when running automake (with or without asciidoc). I'll fix that later.

> +[[commands]] > Commands sent to the UPS drivers > -------------------------------- If anyone has any suggestions on how to differentiate between the Unix domain socket message command, and the TCP-to-upsd commands in the Developers Guide, let me know. -- - Charles Lepple

FYI, I've fixed the below error in the log, directly on the server. The "pre-revprop-change" hook is not in place, so "svn propedit / propset" do not work. 2010/8/28 Arnaud Quette > Author: aquette > Date: Sat Aug 28 00:23:05 2010 > New Revision: 2504 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2504 > > Log: > Fix page titles for

Hello, At 15:42 -0400 on 2014-6-1 Charles Lepple wrote: > > On May 24, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > >> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the > >> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS > >> to do a proper calculation. With the V_interval[] settings, you can > >> tweak

On Jun 2, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > Hello, > > At 15:42 -0400 on 2014-6-1 Charles Lepple wrote: >> >> On May 24, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: >> >>>> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the >>>> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS >>>> to do a

Hi, Is is possible to ship development files for MinGW32 like static libs and headers? I am particularly interested in libvorbisfile required to build Wesnoth on Windows. SDL2 provides a convenient distribution that I unpack and it works: https://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL2_mixer-devel-2.0.1-mingw.tar.gz https://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/ But I can't find where I

On May 24, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: >> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the >> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS >> to do a proper calculation. With the V_interval[] settings, you can >> tweak the new state-of-charge calculation to match what you see via >> upsc when the battery is

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > Log: > Optionaly enable silent build rules, using AM_SILENT_RULES, only if > it's supported (requires automake 1.11) Why do we need a new branch for this? As far as I can see, only the below lines are really needed > +dnl Currently, we only (force) enable silent rules if available > +dnl Verbose mode can be

Thank You for You reply, Charles D?a 07.10.2017 o 14:30 Charles Lepple nap?sal(a): > Is the "lan4.1" cable different from this one? > http://networkupstools.org/cables.html#_tripp_lite Yes, it is different. The correct cable for this interface version looks like this: http://pinouts.ru/UPS/tripplite_smartpro_cable_pinout.shtml > Are you comfortable with rebuilding the

On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Author: aquette > Date: Thu Jan 13 20:10:15 2011 > New Revision: 2825 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2825 > > Log: > Remove AsciiDoc hard-coded verbose flag, which can now be enabled > using 'ASCIIDOC_VERBOSE=-v make' Heh. That's what was making the Debian buildslave pass :-)

On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 03:46 +0000, Charles Lepple wrote: > Author: clepple-guest > Date: Fri Dec 9 03:46:11 2011 > New Revision: 3344 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3344 > > Log: > Force files to be overwritten (especially for libtool) > > Modified: > branches/nut-scanner_dlopen/autogen.sh > > Modified: