similar to: about nut revision 1289

[moving this thread to nut-upsdev] On Jan 12, 2008 5:54 PM, Alexander I. Gordeev <lasaine at lvk.cs.msu.su> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:30:37 +0300, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> > wrote: > > when you figure this out, can we make sure that we know which > > changesets would need to be back-ported to branches/Testing (since > > that is where we would

[moving this thread to nut-upsdev] On Jan 12, 2008 5:54 PM, Alexander I. Gordeev <lasaine at lvk.cs.msu.su> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:30:37 +0300, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> > wrote: > > when you figure this out, can we make sure that we know which > > changesets would need to be back-ported to branches/Testing (since > > that is where we would

Hi Alexander, thanks for your good work on the megatec_usb driver. I have made a few more (cosmetic) changes. Is the driver now working stably for your device? In particular, do the instant commands (and particularly "upsdrvctl -k") work properly? In this case, we could hopefully mark the device as "supported" and merge the driver to the main branch. There is still the

I have an UPS, that claims to be IPPon Back Power Pro 700. I'm trying to connect it using USB. lsusb -v says: Bus 1 Device 3: ID 06da:0003 Phoenixtec Power Co., Ltd Device Descriptor: bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 1.10 bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0

Hi Alexey, Please post the output of 'lsusb' and 'megatec_usb -a sven_625 -u nut -DDDDD'. On Monday 15 June 2009 14:32:16 you wrote: > Package: nut > Version: 2.4.1-3 > Severity: normal > > I have a SVEN Pro+ 625 ups that uses megatec_usb driver. > In ups.conf I describe it like: > [sven_625] > driver = megatec_usb > port = auto > desc =

I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR -- and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using the F6C1200-UNV. My system does see the device; dmesg says [ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver

I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR -- and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using the F6C1200-UNV. My system does see the device; dmesg says [ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver

Citeren Alexander Gordeev <lasaine op lvk.cs.msu.su>: > I've received the units. Are there any special things I should test or > just the standard NUT setup? They should be detected out of the box (with the latest version from the trunk) through the 'usbhid-ups' driver. Note that I just added some additional commands to enable|disable|mute the beeper of the UPS.

Hi, All! I've recently bought an UPS. It is Krauler UP-M500VA, it has USB port and is a HID device. But as I discovered the only HID application it supports is 0x860004, so it isn't claimed by both hidups and newhidups drivers, because it uses a vendor-specific values. I tried to discover values in that x86 page, but I failed. How can I do it? And after I get values how to understand

Hi All, finally, I've got time and resources for development. Unfortunately I couldn't afford playing with my UPS because it was used permanently, but now it's ok. I've checked out cureent trunc and I see that Andrey Lelikov's changes haven't been applied yet. What's wrong with them? I think, he made a great job to simplify future support for this kind of

Alexander Gordeev wrote: > Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Mon Aug 13 13:09:43 2007 > New Revision: 1049 > > Log: > drivers/megatec_usb.c: added credits to the banner message. Is this really needed/desirable? I think this kind of information needs to be put in the AUTHORS document. There are many more people on this list that put a lot of effort in NUT, without claiming credit

Does this require a new entry in scripts/hotplug/* and scripts/udev/*? -- Peter Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Sat May 26 12:04:26 2007 > New Revision: 924 > > Log: > data/driver.list: added SVEN Power Smart RM 2000 to the list. > > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/data/driver.list > > Modified: trunk/ChangeLog >

Hi, Please update the instructions for compiling trunk on the website: replace 'autoreconf' with 'autoreconf --install' because it stopped working after r1561. -- Alexander

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:

Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:

Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but

Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but

2010/3/14 IT Department ULQS <it at quality.ua>: > > I try send this email to 'carlos.efr at mail.telepac.pt' but: > Fri 2010-03-12 19:26:13: <-- 550-The account has been suspended > Fri 2010-03-12 19:26:13: <-- 550 A conta do destinatario encontra-se > suspensa (#5.1.1) right, Carlos is retired from the NUT team. moreover the megatec and megatec_usb driver are

I recently bought a Belkin F6H375 UPS. It connects to the computer via USB. Searching the Internet led me to believe that the megatec_usb driver in nut supports this UPS, however I've been unable to get it to work. I have this in ups.conf: [belkinusb] driver = megatec_usb port = auto desc = "Belkin USB" Here's what happens when I try to use it: ~ #